Fethiye Burdur Fay Zonu’nun Kuzeydoğu Kesiminin (Burdur-Güneybatı Anadolu) Göreceli Tektonik Aktivitesinin Jeomorfik İndislerle İncelenmesi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 62 Sayı: 3, 221 - 246, 31.08.2019

Berkant Coşkuner , Yaşar Eren , Ramazan Demircioğlu , Rahmi Aksoy

https://doi.org/10.25288/tjb.546135

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışmada Burdur güneyinde yer alan Burdur ve Yarışlı havzalarının jeomorfolojik indislerle tektonik aktivitesinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yörede Jura- Kretase yaşlı ofiyolitik melanj, Geç Triyas – Erken Jura yaşlı rekristalize kireçtaşları, Geç Miyosen - Erken Pliyosen yaşlı killi kireçtaşları ve Geç Pliyosen - Kuvaterner yaşlı alüvyal yelpaze çökelleri gibi değişik kökenli kayaçlar bulunmaktadır. İnceleme alanı Fethiye – Burdur Fay Zonu (FBFZ)’ nun KD kesimini kapsamaktadır. Tarihsel ve aletsel dönemde birçok deprem oluşturan FBFZ bu kesimde, KD-GB uzanımlı Burdur, Karakent, Karacaören fayları ve KB-GD uzanımlı Karaçal Fayı ile temsil edilmektedir. Söz konusu fayların yanı sıra bölgede küçük ölçekli birçok fay bulunmaktadır. Yapılan çalışmada bölgenin tektonik aktvitesini belirlemek için Dağ Yamacı Eğrilik İndisi (Smf), Vadi Taban Genişliği – Vadi Yüksekliği Oranı İndeksi (Vf), Normalleştirilmiş Akarsu Uzunluk – Eğri İndisi (SLK), Asimetri Faktörü (AF), Topografi Simetri Faktörü (T), ve Göreceli Aktif Tektonik İndeksi (Iat) gibi birçok değer hesaplanmış ve bunlar arazi verileri ile beraberce değerlendirilerek yorumlanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre Smf 1,03-1,66, ortalama Vf 0,28-10,85, ortalama SLK 1,84-7,95, T 0-0,6 arasında değişmektedir. Burdur Havzası’na ait AF değeri 60,14 iken alt alanlara ait Iat değerleri ise Sınıf-2 ve Sınıf-3 ü kapsamaktadır. Jeomorfik indisler diğer jeolojik bulguları doğrular şekilde inceleme alanının yüksek ve orta seviyede tektonik bir aktiviteye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Burdur Havzası, Fethiye – Burdur Fay Zonu, Iat, Jeomorfik İndis, SLK

Investigation of Relative Tectonic Activity of the Northeastern Part of the Fethiye Burdur Fault Zone (Burdur-Southwestern Anatolia) by Geomorphic Indices

Öz

This study aims to investigate the tectonic activity with geomorphological indices within Burdur and Yarışlı Basins in the south of Burdur. The study area consists of Jurassic– Cretaceous ophiolitic melange, Late Triassic-Early Jurassic recrystallized limestone, Late Miocene – Early Pliocene marl and clayed limestone and Late Pliocene – Early Pleistocene alluvial fan deposit. The study area covers the NE section of the Fethiye - Burdur Fault Zone (FBFZ). The FBFZ, which caused many earthquakes in historical and instrumental periods, is represented by NE-SW trending Burdur, Karakent, Karacaören faults and NW-SE trending Karaçal fault. In addition there are many small scale faults in the area. In order to determine the tectonic activity of the region, some geomorphological indices such as Mountain-Front Sinuosity (Smf), Ratio of Valley-Floor Width to Valley Height (Vf), Normalized Stream Length – Gradient Index (SLK), Asymmetry Factor (AF), Topographic Symmetry Factor (T), and Index of relative active tectonics (Iat) were calculated. The obtained data were compared with the field observations. According to the results, Smf ranges between 1.03-1.66, average Vf ranges between 0.28-10.85, average SLK ranges between 1.84-7.95 and T ranges between 0-0.6. The AF value of Burdur Basin is 60,14 whereas the Iat values of sub-areas cover Class-2 and Class-3. Geomorphic indices, confirming the other geological findings, show that the study area has moderate to high level tectonic activity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Burdur Basin, Fethiye – Burdur Fault Zone, Geomorphic indices, Iat, SLK

Kaynakça

• Aksarı, S., 2016. Burdur - Fethiye Fay Zonunun Kemer (Burdur) - Çameli (Denizli) arasındaki bölümünün yapısal evrimi. Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya, 194 s., (yayımlanmamış).
• Aksoy, R. ve Aksarı, S., 2016. Neogene-Quaternary evolution of the Tefenni basin on the Fethiye-Burdur fault zone, SW Anatolia-Turkey. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 118, 137-148.
• Alçiçek, M.C., 2001. Sedimentological Investigation of Çameli Basin (Late Miocene - Late Pliocene, Denizli, (SW Anatolia). Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 110 s., (yayımlanmamış).
• Alçiçek, M. C., Mayda, S. ve Titov, V. V., 2013. Lower Pleistocene stratigraphy of the Burdur basin of SW Anatolia. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 12, 1-11.
• Alçiçek, M.C., 2015. Comment on “The Fethiye–Burdur Fault Zone: A component of upper plate extension of the subduction transform edge propagator fault linking Hellenic and Cyprus Arcs, Eastern Mediterranean. Tectonophysics 635, 80–99” by J. Hall, A.E. Aksu, İ. Elitez, C. Yaltırak, G. Çiftçi. Tectonophysics, 664, 1–4.
• Angelier, J., Dumont, J., Karamanderesi, H., Poisson, A., Şimşek, Ş. ve Uysal, Ş., 1981. Analyses of fault mechanisms and expansion of southwestern Anatolia since the late Miocene. Tectonophysics, 75 (3.), 1-9.
• Azor, A., Keller, E. A. ve Yeats, R. S., 2002. Geomorphic indicators of active fold growth: South Mountain–Oak Ridge anticline, Ventura basin, southern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 114 (6), 745-753.
• Bagha, N., Arian, M., Ghorashi, M., Pourkermani, M., El Hamdouni, R. ve Solgi, A., 2014. Evaluation of relative tectonic activity in the Tehran basin, central Alborz, northern Iran. Geomorphology, 213, 66-87.
• Barka, A. ve Reilinger, R., 1997. Active tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region: deduced from GPS, neotectonic and seismicity data. Annals of Geophysics, 40 (3), 587-610.
• Barka, A., Reilinger, R., Şaroğlu, F. ve Şengör, A., 1995. The Isparta Angle: its importance in the neotectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. International Earth Sciences Colloqium on the Aegean Region, 1, 3-17.
• Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü, 2019. www.koeri.boun.edu.tr, 22 Mart 2019.
• Bozcu, M., Yağmurlu, F. ve Şentürk, M., 2007. Fethiye-Burdur Fay Zonunun Bazı Neotektonik ve Paleosismolojik Özellikleri, GB-Türkiye. Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi, 31 (1), 25-48.
• Bozkurt, E., 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey–a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta, 14 (1-3), 3-30.
• Brookfield, M., 1998. The evolution of the great river systems of southern Asia during the Cenozoic India-Asia collision: rivers draining southwards. Geomorphology, 22 (3-4), 285-312.
• Bull, W.B., 1978. Geomorphic Tectonic class of the South Front of the San Gabriel Mountains, California. U.S. Geological Survey, Contract Report, 14-08-001-G-394.
• Bull, W.B. ve McFadden, L.D., 1977. Tectonic Geomorphology North and South of the Garlock Fault, California. Geomorphology in Arid Regions. 8th Annual Geomorphology Symposium, University of New York, 23-24 September 1977, D.O. Doehring (ed.), Binghamton, 115-138.
• Chen, Y. C., Sung, Q. ve Cheng, K. Y., 2003. Along-strike variations of morphotectonic features in the Western Foothills of Taiwan: tectonic implications based on stream-gradient and hypsometric analysis. Geomorphology, 56 (1-2), 109-137.
• Cheng, Y., He, C., Rao, G., Yan, B., Lin, A., Hu, J., Yu, Y. ve Yao, Q., 2018. Geomorphological and structural characterization of the southern Weihe Graben, central China: Implications for fault segmentation. Tectonophysics, 722, 11-24.
• Cohen, H., Dart, C., Akyüz, H. ve Barka, A., 1995. Syn-rift sedimentation and structural development of the Gediz and Büyük Menderes graben, western Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, 152 (4), 629-638.
• Coşkuner, B., 2017. Fethiye – Burdur Fay Zonunun Kozluca - Burdur Arasındaki Bölümünün Neotektonik Özellikleri, GB Anadolu, Türkiye. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya, 80 s., (yayımlanmamış).
• Coşkuner, B., ve Aksoy, R., 2017. Kinematic and Structural Characteristics Of The Fethiye-Burdur Fault Zone Between Boğaziçi and Çendik (Burdur), SW Anatolia, Turkey. Internatıonal Symposium On GIS Applications In Geography & Geosciences, Çanakkale, s.:81.
• Cox, R. T., 1994. Analysis of drainage-basin symmetry as a rapid technique to identify areas of possible Quaternary tilt-block tectonics: An example from the Mississippi Embayment. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106 (5), 571-581.
• Dehbozorgi, M., Pourkermani, M., Arian, M., Matkan, A., Motamedi, H. ve Hosseiniasl, A., 2010. Quantitative analysis of relative tectonic activity in the Sarvestan area, central Zagros, Iran. Geomorphology, 121 (3-4), 329-341.
• Dilts, T. E., 2015. Polygon to Centerline Tool for ArcGIS. University of Nevada Reno. Available at: http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=bc642731870740aabf48134f90aa6165
• Dumont, J., Poisson, A. ve Şahinci, A., 1979. Sur l’existence de coulissements sinistres recentes a l’extermité orientale de l’arc ageen (sud-ouest de la Turquie). Comptes Rendus Acadademie Science Paris, 289, 261-264.
• Duvall, A., Kirby, E. ve Burbank, D., 2004. Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in costal California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109 (F3).
• Elitez, İ. ve Yaltırak, C., 2014. Çameli Havzası’nın Miyosen-Kuvaterner Jeodinamiği, Burdur-Fethiye Makaslama Zonu (GB Türkiye). Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 57 (3), 41-67.
• Elitez, İ., Yaltırak, C., Hall, J., Aksu, A.E. ve Çifçi, G., 2015. Reply to the comment by M.C. Alçiçek on “The Fethiye–Burdur Fault Zone: A component of upper plate extension of the subduction transform edge propagator fault linking Hellenic and Cyprus Arcs, Eastern Mediterranean,” Tectonophysics, 635, 80–99, by J. Hall, A.E. Aksu, İ. Elitez, C. Yaltirak and G. Çifçi. Tectonophysics, 664, 5-13.
• Elitez, İ., Yaltırak, C. ve Aktuğ, B., 2016. Extensional and compressional regime driven left-lateral shear in southwestern Anatolia (eastern Mediterranean): The Burdur-Fethiye Shear Zone. Tectonophysics, 688, 26-35.
• Elitez, İ., Yaltırak, C., Kürçer, A., Özdemir, E. ve Güldoğan, Ç. U., 2017. A critical review of the Kibyra Fault (Burdur-Fethiye Shear Zone, SW Turkey). Geodinamica Acta, 29(1), 91-102.
• El Hamdouni, R., Irigaray, C., Fernández, T., Chacón, J. ve Keller, E., 2008. Assessment of relative active tectonics, southwest border of the Sierra Nevada (southern Spain). Geomorphology, 96 (1-2), 150-173.
• Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Özalp, S. ve Elmacı, H., 2011. 1:250.000 ölçekli Türkiye diri fay haritası serisi, Isparta Paftası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye. Seri No: 17.
• Erakman, B., Meşhur, M., Gül, M., Alkan, H., Öztaş, Y. ve Akpınar, M., 1982. Fethiye-Köyceğiz-Tefenni-Elmalı-Kalkan arasında kalan alanın jeolojisi, Türkiye, 6. Petrol Kongresi, Ankara, 23-31.
• Eyidoǧan, H. ve Barka, A., 1996. The 1 October 1995 Dinar earthquake, SW Turkey. Terra Nova, 8 (5), 479-485.
• Font, M., Amorese, D. ve Lagarde, J. L., 2010. DEM and GIS analysis of the stream gradient index to evaluate effects of tectonics: the Normandy intraplate area (NW France). Geomorphology, 119 (3-4), 172-180.
• Gao, M., Zeilinger, G., Xu, X., Wang, Q. ve Hao, M., 2013. DEM and GIS analysis of geomorphic indices for evaluating recent uplift of the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, China. Geomorphology, 190, 61-72.
• Graciansky, P. C., 1972. Recherches géologiques dans le Taurus Lycien. Doktora Tezi, Universite de Paris-Sud, Centre d'Orsay, Paris, 731 s.
• Gürbüz, E., Kazancı, N. ve Gürbüz, A., 2015. Strike-slip faulting, topographic growth and block movements as deduced from drainage anomalies: the Yeşilırmak River basin, northern Turkey. Geomorphology, 246, 634–648.
• Hack, J. T., 1973. Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index. Journal of Research of the US Geological Survey, 1 (4), 421-429.
• Hall, J., Aksu, A., Yaltırak, C. ve Winsor, J., 2009. Structural architecture of the Rhodes Basin: a deep depocentre that evolved since the Pliocene at the junction of Hellenic and Cyprus Arcs, eastern Mediterranean. Marine Geology, 258 (1), 1-23.
• Hall, J., Aksu, A., Elitez, I., Yaltırak, C. ve Çifçi, G., 2014. The Fethiye–Burdur Fault Zone: A component of upper plate extension of the subduction transform edge propagator fault linking Hellenic and Cyprus Arcs, Eastern Mediterranean. Tectonophysics, 635, 80-99.
• Hare, P. W. ve Gardner, T. W., 1985. Geomorphic indicators of vertical neotectonism along converging plate margins, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. Tectonic Geomorphology, 4, 75-104.
• Jackson, J. ve McKenzie, D., 1988. Rates of active deformation in the Aegean Sea and surrounding regions. Basin Research, 1 (3), 121-128.
• Karaman, M., 1986. Burdur dolayının genel stratigrafisi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Isparta Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 23-35.
• Karaman, M., 1994. Isparta-Burdur arasının jeolojisi ve tektonik özellikleri. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 37 (2), 119-134.
• Kaymakci, N., Özacar, A.A., Özkaptan, M., Koç, A., Gülyüz, E., Lefebvre, C., Uzel, B., Langereis, C.G. ve Sözbilir, H., 2014. Fethiye–Burdur fault zone: a myth. In: The 8th International Symposium on Eastern Mediterranean Geology (ISEMG-8), Muğla.
• Kaymakci, N., Langereis, C., Özkaptan, M., Özacar, A.A., Gülyüz, E., Uzel, B. ve Sözbilir, H., 2017. Fethiye-Burdur Fault Zone (SW Turkey): a myth? In: 19th EGU General Assembly, EGU2017. COPERNICUS, Vienna, Austria, 5443.
• Kaymakci, N., Langereis, C., Özkaptan, M., Özacar, A.A., Gülyüz, E., Uzel, B. ve Sözbilir, H., 2018. Paleomagnetic evidence for upper plate response to a STEP fault, SW Anatolia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 498, 101–115.
• Keller, E.A., 1986. Investigation of active tectonics: use of surficial earth processes. Active Tectonics, Studies in Geophysics. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 136–147 s.
• Keller, E.A. ve Pinter, N., 2002. Active Tectonics: Earthquakes, Uplift, and Landscape, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 362 s.
• Kirby, E. ve K.X. Whipple., 2012. Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes. Journal of Structural Geology, 44, 54-75.
• Kissel, C., Laj, C. ve Müller, C., 1985. Tertiary geodynamical evolution of northwestern Greece: paleomagnetic results. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 72 (2–3), 190-204.
• Koçyiğit, A., 1984. Güneybatı Türkiye ve yakın dolayında levha içi yeni tektonik gelişim. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, 27 (1), 1-16.
• Koçyiğit, A. ve Özacar, A. A., 2003. Extensional neotectonic regime through the NE edge of the outer Isparta Angle, SW Turkey: new field and seismic data. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 12 (1), 67-90.
• Köle, M. M., 2016. Devrez Çayı Vadisinin Tektonik Özelliklerinin Morfometrik İndisler ile Araştırılması. Coğrafya Dergisi, 33, 20-36.
• Mahmood, S. A. ve Gloaguen, R., 2012. Appraisal of active tectonics in Hindu Kush: Insights from DEM derived geomorphic indices and drainage analysis. Geoscience Frontiers, 3 (4), 407-428.
• Moix, P., Vachard, D., Jamesallibon, R., Wernli, R., Kozur, H. ve Stampfli, G., 2013. Palaeotethyan, Neotethyan and hulu - pindos seriesin the lycian nappes (SW Turkey) Geodynamica implications, The Triassic System. New Developments in Stratigraphy and Paleontology Bulletin, 61, 401-404.
• Molin, P., Pazzaglia, F.J. ve Dramis, F., 2004. Geomorphic expression of active tectonics in a rapidly-deforming forearc, Sila massif, Calabria, southern Italy. American Journal of Science, 304 (7), 559–589.
• Ntokos, D., Lykoudi, E. ve Rondoyanni, T., 2016. Geomorphic analysis in areas of low-rate neotectonic deformation: South Epirus (Greece) as a case study. Geomorphology, 263, 156-169.
• Özkaptan, M., Koç, A., Lefebvre, C., Gülyüz, E., Uzel, B., Kaymakci, N., Langereis, C.G., Özacar, A.A.ve Sözbilir, H., 2014. Kinematics of SW Anatolia implications on crustal deformation above slab tear. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 6061.
• Özkaptan, M., Kaymakcı, N., Langereis, C.G., Gülyüz, E., Özacar, A.A., Uzel, B. ve Sözbilir, H., 2018, Age and kinematics of the Burdur basin: Inferences for the existence of the Fethiye-Burdur Fault Zone in SW Anatolia (Turkey). Tectonophysics, 744, 256-274.
• Özkaymak, Ç., 2015. Tectonic analysis of the Honaz Fault (western Anatolia) using geomorphic indices and the regional implications. Geodinamica Acta, 27 (2-3), 110-129.
• Pérez‐Peña, J., Azañón, J., Azor, A., Delgado, J. ve González‐Lodeiro, F., 2009, "Spatial analysis of stream power using GIS: SLk anomaly maps". Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34 (1), 16-25.
• Price, S., 1989. Sedimentation and Neotectonic of the Burdur Region, SW Turkey. Doktora Tezi, University of Leicester, Leicester.
• Poisson, A., 1977. Recherches géologiques dans les Taurides occidentales (Turquie). Doktora Tezi, Universite de Paris-Sud., Centre D'Orsay.
• Ramírez-Herrera, M.T., 1998. Geomorphic assessment of active tectonics in the Acambay Graben, Mexican volcanic belt. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23, 317–332.
• Sarp, G. ve Düzgün, Ş., 2012. Spatial analysis of morphometric indices: the case of Bolu pull-apart basin, western section of North Anatolian Fault System, Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 25 (1-2), 86-95.
• Seeber, L. ve Gornitz, V., 1983. River profiles along the Himalayan arc as indicators of active tectonics. Tectonophysics, 92 (4), 335-367.
• Selim, H., Tüysüz, O., Karakaş, A. ve Taş, K., 2013. Morphotectonic evidence from the southern branch of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) and basins of the south Marmara sub-region, NW Turkey. Quaternary international, 292, 176-192.
• Seyitoğlu, G. ve Scott, B., 1991. Late Cenozoic crustal extension and basin formation in west Turkey. Geological Magazine, 128 (02), 155-166.
• Silva, P. G., Goy, J., Zazo, C. ve Bardajı, T., 2003. Fault-generated mountain fronts in southeast Spain: geomorphologic assessment of tectonic and seismic activity. Geomorphology, 50 (1-3), 203-225.
• Şaroğlu, F., Emre, Ö. ve Boray, A., 1987. Türkiye’nin diri fayları ve depremsellikleri. MTA Rapor No 394.
• Şenel, M., Selçuk, H., Bilgin, Z., Şen, A., Karaman, T., Dinçer, M. ve Bilgi, C., 1989. Çameli (Denizli)-Yeşilova (Burdur)-Elmalı (Antalya) ve Dolayının Jeolojisi. MTA Raporu, 9429.
• Şenel, M. ve Bölükbaşı, A., 1997. Geological Map of Fethiye, M9 quadrangle, No: 5, 1: 100,000, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey.
• Şengör, A. M. C., 1987. Cross-faults and differential stretching of hanging walls in regions of low-angle normal faulting: examples from western Turkey. Geological Society London Special Publications, 28 (1), 575-589.
• Taymaz, T. ve Price, S., 1992. The 1971 May 12 Burdur earthquake sequence, SW Turkey: a synthesis of seismological and geological observations. Geophysical Journal International, 108 (2), 589-603.
• Ten Veen, J. H., 2004. Extension of Hellenic forearc shear zones in SW Turkey: the Pliocene–Quaternary deformation of the Eşen Çay Basin. Journal of Geodynamics, 37 (2), 181-204.
• U. S. Geological Survey, 2019. www.usgs.gov, 22 March 2019.
• VanLaningham, S., Meigs, A. ve Goldfinger, C., 2006. The effects of rock uplift and rock resistance on river morphology in a subduction zone forearc, Oregon, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31 (10), 1257–1279.
• Whipple, K.X., 2004. Bedrock rivers and the geomorphology of active orogens. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 32, 151–185.
• Wu, L., Xiao, A., ve Yang, S., 2014. Impact of wind erosion on detecting active tectonics from geomorphic indexes in extremely arid areas: a case study from the Hero Range, Qaidam Basin, NW China. Geomorphology, 224, 39-54.
• Xue, L., Gani, N. D. ve Abdelsalam, M. G., 2017. Geomorphologic proxies for bedrock rivers: A case study from the Rwenzori Mountains, East African Rift system. Geomorphology, 285, 374-398.
• Yağmurlu, F., Savaşçın, Y. ve Ergün, M., 1997. Relation of alkaline volcanism and active tectonism within the evolution of the Isparta Angle, SW Turkey. The journal of geology, 105 (6), 717-728.
• Yağmurlu, F., 2000. Burdur fayının sismotektonik özellikleri. Batı Anadolunun Depremselliği Sempozyumu, 24-27 Mayıs 2000, İzmir, 143-151.
• Yağmurlu, F., Bozcu, M. ve Şentürk, M., 2005. Burdur-Fethiye Arasındaki Bölgede Burdur Fayının Sismotektonik Özellikleri. TÜBİTAK, Proje No: 101Y027, 79 s.
• Yaltırak, C., İşler, E.B., Aksu, A.E. ve Hiscott, R.N., 2012. Evolution of the Bababurnu Basin and shelf of the Biga Peninsula: western extension of the middle strand of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Northeast Aegean Sea. Turkey. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 57, 103–119.
• Yazıcı, M., Zabcı, C., Sançar, T. ve Natalin, B.A., 2018. The role of intraplate strike-slip faults in shaping the surrounding morphology: The Ovacık Fault (eastern Turkey) as a case study. Geomorphology, 321, 129–145.
• Yıldırım, C., 2014. Relative tectonic activity assessment of the Tuz Gölü fault zone; Central Anatolia, Turkey. Tectonophysics, 630, 183-192.
• Zanchi, A., Kissel, C. ve Tapırdamaz, C., 1993. Late Cenozoic and Quaternary brittle continental deformation in western Turkey. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 164 (4), 507-517.