Occupational Accidents in the Turkish Construction Sector: Descriptive Statistics and Probabilistic Risk Assessment Models

Öz

The construction industry’s occupational health and safety (OHS) policies require re-evaluation due to inherent risks. This study statistically analyzes 434,314 occupational accidents reported to Social Security Institute (SSI) in Turkey (2012-2021), employing a Probit regression model to test fatality probabilities. Findings demonstrate that OHS training marginally reduces fatality probability by 1.28%, while blue-collar occupations carry higher mathematical weight in operational risk than advanced age. These probabilistic coefficients were converted into Process Safety Risk Scores (PRS) for site optimization and actuarial premium adjustment factors for risk-based insurance. Consequently, this study shifts construction safety from administrative processes toward data-driven, concrete risk management and engineering models

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Construction industry
• occupational accidents
• cross-tabulation analysis
• probit regression
• risk-based workers' compensation
• design for safety

Türk İnşaat Sektöründe İş Kazaları: Tanımlayıcı İstatistikler ve Olasılıksal Risk Değerlendirme Modelleri

Öz

En riskli sektörlerden biri olan inşaat sektöründe iş sağlığı ve güvenliği (İSG) politikalarının etkinliği yeniden değerlendirilmelidir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye inşaat sektöründe 2012-2021 arası Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumuna (SGK) bildirilen 434.314 iş kazası istatistiksel olarak incelenerek, kazaların ölümle sonuçlanma olasılığı Probit regresyon modeliyle test edilmiştir. Bulgular, İSG eğitiminin ölüm olasılığını marjinal olarak %1,28 azalttığını; mavi yakalı meslek gruplarının operasyonel risk önceliğinde ileri yaş faktöründen daha yüksek matematiksel ağırlığa sahip olduğunu kanıtlamıştır. Elde edilen olasılıksal katsayılar; şantiye optimizasyonu için Proses Güvenlik Risk Skoruna (PRS) ve risk-tabanlı sigortacılık için aktüeryal prim düzeltme faktörüne dönüştürülmüştür. Çalışma, inşaat güvenliğini idari bir süreçten çıkarıp veriye dayalı, somut bir risk yönetimi ve mühendislik modeline taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnşaat sektörü
• iş kazaları
• çapraz tablolama analizi
• probit regresyon
• risk tabanlı sigorta modeli
• tasarım için güvenlik

Kaynakça

1. Nyirendaavwill, V., Chinniah Y., Agard, B., Identifying key factors for an occupational health and safety risk estimation tool in small and medium-size enterprises. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 541–546, 2015.
2. European statistics on accidents at work (ESAW) Summary methodology, Eurostat European Commission, Luxembourg, 2013.
3. ILO, Indicator description: Occupational injuries [online], https://ilostat.ilo.org/methods/concepts-and-definitions/description occupational-safety-and-health-statistics/, Erişim tarihi: 16 Kasım 2025, 2021.
4. EUROSTAT, Non-fatal accidents at work by NACE Rev. 2 activity and sex, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/hsw_n2_01__custom_18912669/default/table, Erişim tarihi: 16 Kasım 2025.
5. EUROSTAT, Fatal accidents at work by NACE Rev. 2 activity, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/hsw_n2_02/default/table?lang=en&category=hlth.hsw.hsw_acc_work.hsw_n2, Erişim tarihi: 16 Kasım 2025.
6. Weeks, J. L., Health and safety hazards in the construction industry, ILO Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 4th Edition, Geneva, 1998.
7. Choi, S. D., Guo, L., Kim, J., Xiong, S., Comparison of fatal occupational injuries in construction industry in the United States, South Korea, and China, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 71, 64-74, 2019.
8. Çalışma Yaşamında Sağlık Gözetimi Rehberi, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Genel Müdürlüğü, 7415, Ankara, 2012.

9. Sousa, V., Almeida, N. M., Dias, L. A., Risk-based management of occupational safety and health in the construction industry–Part 1: Background knowledge. Safety science, 66, 75-86, 2014.
10. Luo, X., Li, X., Song, X., Liu, Q., Convolutional neural network algorithm–based novel automatic text classification framework for construction accident reports, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(12), 04023128, 2023.
11. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of fatal occupational injuries summary, 2023, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.nr0.htm, Yayın tarihi: 19 Aralık 2024, Erişim tarihi: 10 Ocak 2025.
12. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı, 2023-İnşaat Genel Veriler- İnfografik 1, https://guvenliinsaat.csgb.gov.tr/media/c2nnsh33/info1.pdf, Yayın tarihi: 2 Şubat 2025, Erişim tarihi: 10 Şubat 2025.
13. T.C. Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu, SGK 2022 İstatistik Yıllığı, https://www.sgk.gov.tr/Istatistik/Yillik/fcd5e59b-6af9-4d90-a451-ee7500eb1cb4/, Yayın tarihi: 2023, Erişim tarihi: 10 Şubat 2025.
14. Leigh, J. P., Markowitz, S. B., Fahs, M., Shin, C., Landrigan, P. J., Occupational Injury and Illness in the United States: Estimates of Costs, Morbidity, and Mortality, Archives of Internal Medicine, 157(14), 1557-68, 1997.
15. Harrington, J. M., Gill, F. S., Aw, T. C., Gardiner, K., Occupational Health, 4th Edition, United Kingdom. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 1998.
16. López, M. A. C., Ritzel, D. O., Fontaneda, I., Alcantara, O. J. G., Construction industry accidents in Spain, Journal of safety research, 39(5), 497-507, 2008.
17. Tözer, K. D., Çelik, T., Gürcanlı, G. E., Classification of construction accidents in northern Cyprus, Teknik Dergi, 29(2), 8295-8316, 2018.
18. Gürcanlı, G. E., Müngen, U., Analysis of construction accidents in Turkey and responsible parties, Industrial health, 51(6), 581-595, 2013.
19. Özgürer, G., Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti, İnşaat Sektöründe Meydana Gelen İş Kazalarının Analizi, Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 35(4), 95-116, 2024.
20. Pérez-Alonso, J., Carreño-Ortega, Á., Vázquez-Cabrera, F. J., Callejón-Ferre, Á. J., Accidents in the greenhouse-construction industry of SE Spain, Applied Ergonomics, 43(1), 69-80, 2012.
21. Lombardi, M., Fargnoli, M., Parise, G., Risk profiling from the European statistics on accidents at work (ESAW) accidents′ databases: A case study in construction sites, International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(23), 4748, 2019.
22. Kim, Y. A., Ryoo, B. Y., Kim, Y. S., Huh, W. C., Major accident factors for effective safety management of highway construction projects, Journal of construction engineering and management, 139(6), 628-640, 2013.
23. Akboğa, Ö., Baradan, S., İnşaat sektöründeki ölümlü iş kazalarının karakteristiklerinin incelenmesi: İzmir alan çalışması, 5. İşçi Sağlığı ve İş Güvenliği Sempozyumu, İzmir, 215-224, 2015.
24. Baradan, S., Akboğa, Ö., Çetinkaya, U., Usmen, M. A., Ege bölgesindeki inşaat iş kazalarının sıklık ve çapraz tablolama analizleri, Teknik Dergi, 27(1), 7345-7370, 2016.
25. Kazan, E., Usmen, M. A., Worker safety and injury severity analysis of earthmoving equipment accidents, Journal of safety research, 65, 73-81, 2018.
26. Akşehir, Z. D., Oruç¸ Y., Elibol, A., Akleylek, S., Kılıç, E., On the analysis of work accidents data by using data preprocessing and statistical techniques. 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), 1–6, 2018.
27. Nayak, N. R., Kumar, S., Gupta, D., Suri, A., Naved, M., Soni, M., Network mining techniques to analyze the risk of the occupational accident via bayesian network, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(1), 633-641, 2022.
28. Cakan, H., Kazan, E., Usmen, M., Investigation of factors contributing to fatal and nonfatal roofer fall accidents. International journal of construction education and research, 10(4), 300-317, 2014.
29. Kale, Ö. A., Baradan, S., Identifying factors that contribute to severity of construction injuries using logistic regression model, Teknik Dergi, 31(2), 9919-9940, 2020.
30. Yahya, M. Y. A., Rohani, J. M., Occupational Accidents and Prevention through Design in The Malaysian Construction Industry, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2289-2299, 2021.
31. Bilim, A., Çelik, O. N., Estimating the possibility of workday loss accidents in road construction, Građevinar, 75(12), 1183-1192, 2023.
32. Bria, T. A., Chen, W. T., Muhammad, M., Rantelembang, M. B., Analysis of Fatal Construction Accidents in Indonesia—A Case Study. Buildings, 14(4), 1010, 2024.
33. Erginel, N., Toptancı, Ş., İş Kazası Verilerinin Olasılık Dağılımları ile Modellenmesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı), 201–212, 2017.
34. Kassouf, A., Hoffmann, R., Work-related injuries involving children and adolescents: Application of a recursive bivariate probit model, Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 2006.
35. Alvear-Vega, S., Arenas-Massa, A., Social and health factors affecting work-related accidents among older informal workers in Chile: A probit model analysis based on CASEN 2022, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102231, 2025.
36. Lee, S. Y., Yang, Y. R., Factors Influencing the Subjective Health Status of Older Adult Workers in the Construction Industry Using the Ordered Probit Model: Utilization of Secondary Data. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing, 34(2), 62-75, 2025.
37. Zhang, B., Lu, Q., Research on the Causes of Safety Accidents in Super High-Rise Buildings—Empirical Analysis Based on Bivariate Probit Model, 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022.
38. Bande, R., López-Mourelo, E., The impact of worker’s age on the consequences of occupational accidents: empirical evidence using Spanish data, Journal of Labor Research, 36(2), 129-174, 2015.
39. Wang, H., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Huang, D., Cao, L., Wang, J., Analysis of the injury-severity outcomes of maritime accidents using a zero-inflated ordered probit model, Ocean Engineering, 258, 111796, 2022.
40. Carretero-Gómez, J. M., Forteza, F. J., Estudillo, B., Linking occupational accidents and construction firm survival, Journal of safety research, 85, 485-491, 2023.
41. Eling, M., Schmeiser, H., Insurance and the credit crisis: Impact and ten consequences for risk management and supervision, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 35, 9-34, 2010.
42. Tompa, E., Trevithick, S., McLeod, C., Systematic review of the prevention incentives of insurance and regulatory mechanisms for occupational health and safety, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 85-95, 2007.
43. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Edition, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, 2014.
44. Manly, B. F. J., Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, Second Edition, CRC Press, Florida, 1994.
45. Toptancı, Ş., Erginel, N., Acar, I. P., Predicting the severity of occupational accidents in the construction industry using standard and regularized logistic regression models. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(3), 778-798, 2023.
46. Yiğit, U., Kazar, G., Project characteristics-based predicting the likelihood of occupational accidents in public school maintenances using a topological approach, Safety Science, 184, 106764, 2025.
47. Field, A., Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, Sage publications limited, 2024.
48. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı, Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 001-214, 2018.
49. Gavanji, R., Penalized regression methods for modelling rare events data with application to occupational injury study, Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, 2019.
50. Gonzalez-Delgado, M., Gómez-Dantés, H., Fernández-Niño, J. A., Robles, E., Borja, V. H., Aguilar, M., Factors associated with fatal occupational accidents among Mexican workers: a national analysis. PLoS one, 10(3), e0121490, 2015.
51. Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
52. Scott Long, J., Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables, Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences, 7, 1997.
53. Finney, D. J., Probit Analysis, 3rd edn Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1971.
54. Topcu, Y., Çiftçilerin Tarımsal Destekleme Politikalarından Faydalanma İstekliliğinde Etkili Faktörlerin Analizi: Erzurum İli Örneği, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 205–212, 2008.
55. Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis, 8th ed., Pearson, 2018.
56. Kulendran, N., Wong, K.K.F., Determinants versus Composite Leading Indicators in Predicting Turning Points in Growth Cycle, Journal of Travel Research, 50(4), 417 – 430, 2011.
57. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Brown, C.H., Wang, W., Hoffman, J.M., The Intermediate Endpoint Effect in Logistic and Probit Regression, Clinical Trials, 4, 499 – 513, 2007.
58. Cameron, A. C., Trivedi, P. K., Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
59. Ai, C., Norton, E. C., Interaction terms in logit and probit models, Economics letters, 80(1), 123-129, 2003.
60. Hallowell, M. R., Gambatese, J. A., Activity-based safety risk quantification for concrete formwork construction, Journal of construction engineering and management, 135(10), 990-998, 2009.
61. Charehzehi, A., Ahankoob, A., Enhancement of safety performance at construction site, International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 5(1), 303, 2012.
62. Pinto, A., Nunes, I. L., Ribeiro, R. A., Occupational risk assessment in construction industry–Overview and reflection, Safety science, 49(5), 616-624, 2011.
63. Lemaire, J., Bonus-Malus Systems in Automobile Insurance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston-Dotrecht-London, 1995.
64. Tompa, E., Dolinschi, R., de Oliveira, C., Irvin, E., A systematic review of occupational health and safety interventions with economic analyses, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 51(9), 1004-1023, 2009.
65. Szymberski, R. T., Construction project safety planning, Tappi journal, 80(11), 69-74, 1997.
66. Behm, M., Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept, Safety science, 43(8), 589-611, 2005.
67. Toole, T. M., Gambatese, J., The trajectories of prevention through design in construction, Journal of safety research, 39(2), 225-230, 2008.
68. Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S. D., The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications, Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29.