Uyanık derin beyin stimülasyonu ameliyatında intraoperatif kan basıncı kontrolü için nikardipin ve esmololün karşılaştırılması: retrospektif bir çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Uyanık derin beyin stimülasyonu (DBS) cerrahisi, elektrotların optimal yerleştirilmesi için hastanın bilinçli kalmasını ve intraoperatif nörofizyolojik monitörizasyona olanak tanınmasını gerektirir. Ancak, cerrahi sırasında gelişen hipertansiyon önemli klinik zorluklara neden olabilir; bu durum cerrahi doğruluğu ve hasta güvenliğini tehlikeye atabilir. İntraoperatif kan basıncı kontrolü için nikardipin ve esmolol sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır, ancak uyanık DBS cerrahisinde bu ilaçların karşılaştırmalı etkinliği net değildir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, monitörize anestezi bakımı (MAB) altında uyanık DBS cerrahisi sırasında intraoperatif kan basıncını kontrol etmede nikardipin ve esmololün etkinliğini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, Ocak 2020 ile Nisan 2025 tarihleri arasında MAB altında uyanık DBS cerrahisi geçiren hastalar değerlendirildi. İntraoperatif hipertansiyon (sistolik arter basıncı [SAP] ≥150 mmHg) gelişen 40 erişkin hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi ve uygulanan antihipertansif ajana göre iki gruba ayrıldı: nikardipin (n = 20) ve esmolol (n = 20). Hemodinamik parametreler, antihipertansif gereksinimler ve intraoperatif komplikasyonlar karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: İntraoperatif ortalama SAP, nikardipin grubunda esmolol grubuna göre anlamlı şekilde daha düşüktü (121,9 ± 2,6 mmHg vs. 127,9 ± 3,5 mmHg, p = 0,04). Hipertansif atak sıklığı nikardipin grubunda daha düşük olmasına rağmen istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi (15,9% ± 3,6 vs. 26,1% ± 4,1, p = 0,21). Esmolol, anlamlı şekilde daha düşük kalp hızına neden oldu (69,2 ± 2,8 atım/dk vs. 87,9 ± 2,0 atım/dk, p = 0,01), ancak daha yüksek dozda kurtarıcı antihipertansif (gliseril trinitrat: 53,1 ± 5,8 mg vs. 25,8 ± 1,2 mg, p < 0,001) gereksinimi oldu. Her iki grupta da büyük intraoperatif komplikasyon veya genel anesteziye geçiş gözlenmedi. Sonuç: Uyanık DBS cerrahisinde, nikardipin esmollole kıyasla daha etkili ve stabil bir intraoperatif kan basıncı kontrolü sağlamış ve ek antihipertansif ilaç ihtiyacını azaltmıştır. Her iki ajan da hasta iş birliğini veya nörofizyolojik monitörizasyonu bozacak bir yan etki göstermeksizin güvenle uygulanabilmiştir. Bu nedenle, ek antihipertansif tedavi gereksiniminin daha az olması nedeniyle nikardipin tercih edilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• uyanık derin beyin stimülasyonu
• hipertansiyon
• nikardipin
• esmollol
• intraoperatif hemodinami
• nöroanestezi

Comparison of nicardipine and esmolol for intraoperative blood pressure control during awake deep brain stimulation surgery: a retrospective study

Öz

Aim: Awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery requires the patient to remain conscious for optimal electrode placement through intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. However, hypertension during awake DBS poses significant clinical challenges, potentially compromising surgical accuracy and patient safety. Nicardipine and esmolol are both used for intraoperative blood pressure control, but their comparative efficacy in awake DBS remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of nicardipine and esmolol in controlling intraoperative blood pressure during awake DBS surgery under monitored anesthesia care. Material and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent awake DBS surgery under MAC between January 2020 and April 2025. Forty adult patients experiencing intraoperative hypertension (systolic arterial pressure [SAP] ≥150 mmHg) were included and divided into two groups based on the antihypertensive agent administered: nicardipine (n = 20) or esmolol (n = 20). Hemodynamic parameters, antihypertensive requirements, and intraoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: Mean intraoperative SAP was significantly lower in the nicardipine group compared to the esmolol group (121.9 ± 2.6 mmHg vs. 127.9 ± 3.5 mmHg, p = 0.04). Although the frequency of hypertensive episodes tended to be lower with nicardipine, this did not reach statistical significance (15.9% ± 3.6 vs. 26.1% ± 4.1, p = 0.21). Esmolol resulted in significantly lower heart rates (69.2 ± 2.8 bpm vs. 87.9 ± 2.0 bpm, p = 0.01) but required higher doses of rescue antihypertensives (glyceryl trinitrate: 53.1 ± 5.8 mg vs. 25.8 ± 1.2 mg, p < 0.001). No major intraoperative complications or conversions to general anesthesia occurred in both groups. Conclusions: Nicardipine provided more effective and stable intraoperative blood pressure control than esmolol during awake DBS surgery, reducing the need for additional antihypertensive medications. Both agents were safely administered without compromising patient cooperation or neurophysiological monitoring. Therefore, nicardipine may be preferable due to the less need for rescue antihypertensive treatment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• awake deep brain stimulation
• hypertension
• nicardipine
• esmolol
• intraoperative hemodynamics
• neuroanesthesia

Kaynakça

1. Kundu B, Brock AA, Englot DJ, Butson CR, Rolston JD. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of disorders of consciousness and cognition in traumatic brain injury patients: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 45: E14.
2. Maroufi SF, Fallahi MS, Hosseinzadeh Asli S, Khorasanizadeh M, Pour-Rashidi A, Ponce FA, Slavin KV. Awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2024; 142: 324-338.
3. Min KT. Practical guidance for monitored anesthesia care during awake craniotomy. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2025; 20: 23-33.
4. Kim SH, Choi SH. Anesthetic considerations for awake craniotomy. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2020; 15: 269-274.
5. Perez CA, Stutzman S, Jansen T, Perera A, Jannusch S, Atem F, Aiyagari V. Elevated blood pressure after craniotomy: A prospective observational study. J Crit Care 2020; 60: 235-240.
6. Ohwaki K, Yano E, Nagashima H, Hirata M, Nakagomi T, Tamura A. Blood pressure management in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship between elevated blood pressure and hematoma enlargement. Stroke 2004; 35: 1364-7.
7. Sum CY, Yacobi A, Kartzinel R, Stampfli H, Davis CS, Lai CM. Kinetics of esmolol, an ultra-short-acting beta blocker, and of its major metabolite. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34: 427–34.
8. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ et al Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: W163-94.

9. Chowdhury T, Wilkinson M, Cappellani RB. Hemodynamic Perturbations in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: First Detailed Description. Front Neurosci 2017; 11: 477.
10. Bebawy JF, Houston CC, Kosky JL, Badri AM, Hemmer LB, Moreland NC et al. Nicardipine is superior to esmolol for the management of postcraniotomy emergence hypertension: a randomized open-label study. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 186-92.
11. Melekoğlu A, Kahveci U, Köksal Z, Ceritli S, Altınbilek E, Korkmaz M. Comparison of Esmolol and Nicardipine treatment in hypertensive acute ıschemic stroke patients. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 14376.
12. Joung KW, Yang KH, Shin WJ, Song MH, Ham K, Jung SC, Lee DH, Suh DC. Anesthetic consideration for neurointerventional procedures. Neurointervention 2014; 9: 72-7.
13. Hippard HK, Watcha M, Stocco AJ, Curry D. Preservation of microelectrode recordings with non-GABAergic drugs during deep brain stimulator placement in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 14: 279-86.
14. Kwon WK, Kim JH, Lee JH, Lim BG, Lee IO, Koh SB, Kwon TH. Microelectrode recording (MER) findings during sleep-awake anesthesia using dexmedetomidine in deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 143: 27-33.
15. Jain S, Goldstein DS. Cardiovascular dysautonomia in Parkinson disease: from pathophysiology to pathogenesis. Neurobiol Dis 2012; 46: 572-80.
16. Wang X, Wang J, Zhao H, Li N, Ge S, Chen L et al. Clinical analysis and treatment of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after deep brain stimulation surgery. Br J Neurosurg 2017; 31: 217-22.
17. Sansur CA, Frysinger RC, Pouratian N, Fu KM, Bittl M, Oskouian RJ et al. Incidence of symptomatic hemorrhage after stereotactic electrode placement. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 998-1003.
18. Hyam JA, Kringelbach ML, Silburn PA, Aziz TZ, Green AL. The autonomic effects of deep brain stimulation--a therapeutic opportunity. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8: 391-400.
19. Green AL, Hyam JA, Williams C, Wang S, Shlugman D, Stein JF et al. Intra-operative deep brain stimulation of the periaqueductal grey matter modulates blood pressure and heart rate variability in humans. Neuromodulation 2010; 13: 174-81.