Healthy lifestyle behaviours and attitudes of relatives of patients with colorectal cancer towards protection from colorectal cancer
Öz
Aim: This study was conducted in order to determine healthy lifestyle behaviours and attitudes of first degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) towards protection from CRC.
Material and Method: The data were collected by the researcher using Colorectal Cancer Screening Attitude Beliefs Scale (CCSAB), and Health Promotion Life-Style Profile II (HPLP).
Results: It was found that more than half (56.3%) of the patient relatives did not have knowledge about CRC and 85.2% did not participate early diagnosis/screening programs of CRC. It was found that CCSAB total mean score of the patient relatives was 53.06±8.91 and HPLP’ total mean score was 132.46±20.96. Both HPLP’ mean score and CCSAB’ mean score was higher in patient’ relatives who had knowledge about CRC and participated in early diagnosis/screening programs of CRC and the difference was determined to be highly significant. A positive, weak, and statistically significant correlation was found between CCSAB and HPLP scale of patient relatives in the study.
Discussion: The present study showed that the rate of patient relatives to participate in CRC screening participation rates was low, healthy lifestyle behaviours and attitudes towards protection from CRC were moderate. Nurses should raise awareness through protection from cancer and early diagnosis/screening programs especially for cancer patients’ relatives in all individuals is at risk primarily first degree relatives of patients with protection from and be guiding to acquire healthy lifestyle behaviours.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2016. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 2016: 66.
- 2. American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2014-2016. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 2014: 28.
- 3. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer-analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Eng J Med N 2000; 343:78-85.
- 4. Lowery JT, Marcus A, Kinney A, Bowen D, Finkelstein DM, Horick N, et al. The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP): design and baseline data from a randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in high risk families. Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33: 426-35.
- 5. Johnson CM, Wei C, Ensor JE, Smolenski DJ, Amos CI, Levin B, et al. Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors. Cancer Causes Control 2013; 24: 1207-22.
- 6. National Cancer Intelligence Network. Colorectal cancer survival by stage. http://www.ncin.org.uk/publications/data_briefings/colorectal_cancer_survival_by_stage (11.06.16).
- 7. Koc S, Esin MN. Screening behaviors, health beliefs, and related factors of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients with ongoing treatment in Turkey. Cancer Nursing 2014; 37: 51-60.
- 8. Kanbur A, Capik C. Cervical cancer prevention, early diagnosis-screening methods and midwives/nurses role. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal 2011; 18: 61-72.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Hatice Yüceler Kaçmaz
ERCIYES UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF NURSING
Türkiye
Gülsüm Nihal Çürük
IZMIR UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF NURSING
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
29 Mart 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
29 Mart 2017
Kabul Tarihi
25 Nisan 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1