Evaluation of pneumatized artıcular tubercle prevalence and characterıstic features on cone-beam computed tomography images

Öz

Aim: The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of the Pneumatized Articular Tubercle (PAT) and to evaluate the characteristics of PAT in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images.

Material and Methods: A retrospective study was performed using tomographic images of 276 patients (133 male, 143 female) aged between 12-85, who had attended to Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department for different CBCT indications. Age, gender and presence of PAT were recorded for all patients and, for cases of PAT, laterality and radiographic types were also recorded. Obtained variables were entered SPSS 20 software and the prevalence of PAT was evaluated with chi-square test according to genders and age groups.

Results: The mean age of the subjects was 37.75 ± 17.1. Of the 276 patients, 39 (14.1 %) had PAT, of whom 22 were female (15.4 %) and 17 were male (12.8 %). This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.535). PAT was most common (25.6 %) in patients aged between 20-29 years and least common (6.4 %) in patients aged between 50-59 years. The difference was statistically significant between age groups (p=0.008). Of the 39 cases, 22 (56.4 %) had unilateral, and 17 (43.6 %) had bilateral PAT. 35 (62.5%) PATs were multilocular and 24 (37.5%) were unilocular.

Conclusion: PAT was found to be a common anomaly on CBCT images. Presence and characteristics of PAT should be evaluated with CBCT to avoid possible complications especially in patients who will get a surgical intervention to the articular eminence region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pneumatized articular tubercle,zygomatic air cell defect,temporal bone,cone-beam computed tomography

Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntülerinde pnömatize artiküler tüberkül prevalansı ve karakteristik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Aim: The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of the PneumatizedArticular Tubercle (PAT) and to evaluate the characteristics of PAT in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images.

Material and Methods: A retrospective study was performed using tomographic images of 276 patients (133 male, 143 female) aged between 12-85, whohad attended to Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department for different CBCT indications. Age, gender and presence of PAT were recorded for all patients and, for cases of PAT, laterality and radiographic types were also recorded. Obtained variables were entered SPSS 20 software and the prevalence of PAT was evaluated with chi-square test according to genders and age groups.

Results: The mean age of the subjects was 37.75 ± 17.1. Of the 276 patients, 39 (14.1 %) had PAT, of whom 22 were female (15.4 %) and 17 were male (12.8 %). This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.535). PAT was most common (25.6 %) in patients aged between 20-29 years and least common (6.4 %) in patients aged between 50-59 years. The difference was statistically significant between age groups (p=0.008). Of the 39 cases, 22 (56.4 %)had unilateral, and 17 (43.6 %)had bilateral PAT. 35 (62.5%)PATsweremultilocular and 24(37.5%) were unilocular.

Conclusion: PAT was found to be a common anomaly on CBCT images.Presence andcharacteristicsof PAT should be evaluated with CBCT to avoid possible complications especially in patients who will get a surgical intervention to the articular eminence region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• zigomatik hava hücresi defekti,temporal kemik,konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi,Pnömatize artiküler tüberkül

Kaynakça

1. 1. Deluke DM. Pneumatization of the articular eminence of the temporal bone. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 1995; 79: 3-4.
2. 2. Shetty SR, Al PSAAF, Bayati M, Khazi SS, Reddy SM. Zygomatic Air Cell Defect–a Brief Review. Azerbaijan Medical Association Journal 2016; 1: 89-92.
3. 3. Tyndall DA, Matteson SR. The zygomatic air cell defect (ZACD) on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1987; 64: 373-76.
4. 4. Al-Faleh W, Ibrahim M. A tomographic study of air cell pneumatization of the temporal components of the TMJ in patients with temporomadibular joint disorders. Egypt Dent J 2005; 51: 1835-42.
5. 5. Miloglu O, Yilmaz A, Yildirim E, Akgul H. Pneumatization of the articular eminence on cone beam computed tomography: prevalence, characteristics and a review of the literature. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2011; 40: 110-14.
6. 6. Ladeira D, Barbosa G, Nascimento M, Cruz A, Freitas D, Almeida S. Prevalence and characteristics of pneumatization of the temporal bone evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2013; 42: 771-75.
7. 7. Zamaninaser A, Rashidipoor R, Mosavat F, Ahmadi A. Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defect: Panoramic radiographic study of a selected Esfehanian population. Dental research journal 2012; 9: 63.
8. 8. Orhan K, Delilbasi C, Orhan A. Radiographic evaluation of pneumatized articular eminence in a group of Turkish children. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2006; 35: 365-70.

9. 9. Shokri A, Noruzi-Gangachin M, Baharvand M, Mortazavi H. Prevalence and characteristics of pneumatized articular tubercle: First large series in Iranian people. Imaging science in dentistry 2013; 43: 283-87.
10. 10. Kaugars GE, Mercuri LG, Laskin DM. Pneumatization of the articular eminence of the temporal bone: prevalence, development, and surgical treatment. The Journal of the American Dental Association 1986;113:55-57.
11. 11. İlgüy M, Dölekoğlu S, Fişekçioğlu E, Ersan N, İlgüy D. Evaluation of pneumatization in the articular eminence and roof of the glenoid fossa with cone-beam computed tomography. Balkan medical journal 2015; 32: 64.
12. 12. Bronoosh P, Shakibafard A, Mokhtare M, Rad TM. Temporal bone pneumatisation: A computed tomography study of pneumatized articular tubercle. Clinical radiology 2014; 69: 151-56.
13. 13. Hofmann T, Friedrich R, Wedl J, Schmelzle R. Pneumatization of the zygomatic arch on pantomography. Mund-, Kiefer-und Gesichtschirurgie: MKG 2001; 5: 173-79.
14. 14. Orhan K, Delilbasi C, Cebeci I, Paksoy C. Prevalence and variations of pneumatized articular eminence: a study from Turkey. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2005; 99: 349-54.
15. 15. Tyndall D, Matteson S. Radiographic appearance and population distribution of the pneumatized articular eminence of the temporal bone. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1985; 43: 493-97.
16. 16. Orhan K, Ulas O, Orhan A, Ulker A, Delilbasi C, Akcam O. Investigation of pneumatized articular eminence in orthodontic malocclusions. Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2010; 13: 56-60.
17. 17. Yavuz MS, Aras MH, Güngör H, Büyükkurt MC. Prevalence of the pneumatized articular eminence in the temporal bone. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2009; 37: 137-39.
18. 18. Carter L, Haller A, Calamel A, Pfaffenbach A. Zygomatic air cell defect (ZACD). Prevalence and characteristics in a dental clinic outpatient population. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1999; 28: 116-22.
19. 19. Allam AF. V Pneumatization of the Temporal Bone. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1969; 78: 49-64.
20. 20. Tremble GE. Pneumatization of the temporal bone. Archives of Otolaryngology 1934; 19: 172-82.
21. 21. Khojastepour L, Mirbeigi S, Ezoddini F, Zeighami N. Pneumatized Articular Eminence and Assessment of Its Prevalence and Features on Panoramic Radiographs. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran) 2015; 12: 235.
22. 22. Mosavat F, Ahmadi A. Pneumatized Articular Tubercle and Pneumatized Roof of Glenoid Fossa on Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Prevalence and Characteristics in Selected Iranian Population. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Pathology and Surgery 2015; 4: 10-14.
23. 23. Srivathsa SH, Malleshi SN, Patil K, Guledgud MV. A retrospective study of panoramic radiographs for zygomatic air cell defect in children. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences 2014; 1: 79.
24. 24. Arora KS, Kaur P, Kaur K. ZACD: A Retrograde Panoramic Analysis among Indian Population with New System of Classification. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2016; 10: 71.