Araştırma Makalesi

Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy?

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3 22 Haziran 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy?

Öz

Aim: The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients is well known. We aimed to share long term follow up results for primary closure technique for CEA without shunting and investigated risk factors for complications in this patient group. Material and Methods: Between September 2013-2019, 122 patients with isolated CEA with primary closure were enrolled in this retrospective study. Dopppler ultrasound (DUSG) scanning was used as the primary imaging tool for the determination of residual and recurrent stenosis. During the follow-up period duplex ultrasonography was performed in the second month, sixth month and annually thereafter. Ipsilateral cerebrovascular events and mortalities were recorded during follow up period. Results: The mean age was 69,1 ± 7,1 (48-90) years. The median follow-up time was 47 (5 to 78) months. Hospital mortality was reported in 1 patient (0,8%). Early postoperative cerebrovascular accident were seen as ipsilateral disabling stroke in 1 patient (0,8%), ipsilateral non-disabling stroke in 1 patient (0,8%), reversible ischemic neurological deficit (RIND) in 1 patient (0,8%) and massive intracranial bleeding in 1 patient (0,8%). Late mortality was reported in 4 (3,3%) patients. 2 (1,6%) were cardiac reasons and 2 (1,6%) were non cardiac reasons. During the follow-up period ipsilateral cerebrovascular accident (CVA) were seen in 3 patients (2,5%) and these were; ipsilateral disabling stroke in 1 patient (0,8%), ipsilateral non-disabling stroke in 1 patient (0,8%), RIND in 1 patient (0,8%).According to the latest duplex scanning during follow up period 4 (3,3%) patients had below 50% restenosis, 2 (1,7%) patients had above 70% restenosis and 1 (0,8%) patient had total occlusion. Conclusion: Primary closure technique for CEA can be used in selected patients with acceptable early and late complication rates, low mortality and low restenosis rate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Peerless SJ, Ferguson GG, Fox AJ, Rankin RN, Hachinski VC, Wiebers DO, Eliasziw M. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445- 53.
  2. 2. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351: 1379-87.
  3. 3. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273: 1421-8.
  4. 4. Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1491-502.
  5. 5. Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1998; 29: 554-62.
  6. 6. Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR, Byrne K, Lusby RJ. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 29: 676-81.
  7. 7. Geroulakos G, Ramaswami G, Nicolaides A et al. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high resolution real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1274-7.
  8. 8. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis-society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology 2003; 229: 340-6.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Haziran 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Mart 2020

Kabul Tarihi

21 Nisan 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Mavıoğlu, L., Mungan, U., Celasin, H., Günertem, E., & Ünal, E. U. (2020). Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy? Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, 11(3), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.734836
AMA
1.Mavıoğlu L, Mungan U, Celasin H, Günertem E, Ünal EU. Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy? TJCL. 2020;11(3):111-117. doi:10.18663/tjcl.734836
Chicago
Mavıoğlu, Levent, Ufuk Mungan, Haydar Celasin, Eren Günertem, ve Ertekin Utku Ünal. 2020. “Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy?”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 11 (3): 111-17. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.734836.
EndNote
Mavıoğlu L, Mungan U, Celasin H, Günertem E, Ünal EU (01 Haziran 2020) Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy? Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 11 3 111–117.
IEEE
[1]L. Mavıoğlu, U. Mungan, H. Celasin, E. Günertem, ve E. U. Ünal, “Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy?”, TJCL, c. 11, sy 3, ss. 111–117, Haz. 2020, doi: 10.18663/tjcl.734836.
ISNAD
Mavıoğlu, Levent - Mungan, Ufuk - Celasin, Haydar - Günertem, Eren - Ünal, Ertekin Utku. “Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy?”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 11/3 (01 Haziran 2020): 111-117. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.734836.
JAMA
1.Mavıoğlu L, Mungan U, Celasin H, Günertem E, Ünal EU. Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy? TJCL. 2020;11:111–117.
MLA
Mavıoğlu, Levent, vd. “Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy?”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, c. 11, sy 3, Haziran 2020, ss. 111-7, doi:10.18663/tjcl.734836.
Vancouver
1.Levent Mavıoğlu, Ufuk Mungan, Haydar Celasin, Eren Günertem, Ertekin Utku Ünal. Do we really need patch and shunt for carotid endarterectomy? TJCL. 01 Haziran 2020;11(3):111-7. doi:10.18663/tjcl.734836

e-ISSN: 2149-8296

Publication Model: Continuous Publication

Peer Review Model: Double-Blind Peer Review

Publication Language: Turkish and English

Access Model: Open Access

DOI Prefix: (Crossref DOI numaranız)

Publisher: DNT Ortadoğu Publishing Inc.

Journal Abbreviation: Turk J Clin Lab

Indexed in J-Gate

The content of this site is intended for health care professionals. All the published articles are distributed under the terms of

Creative Commons Attribution Licence,

which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.