Derleme

Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services

Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3 29 Eylül 2021
EN TR

Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services

Öz

Developmental psychology is segmented into three areas or domains: biosocial, cognitive, and psychosocial. Biosocial
development relates to the growth and developments within the human body and is viewed as pertaining to physical
growth beginning at the conception of human life through to its death. Included within the biosocial development
domain are biological functions, cultural influences, and environmental factors. All these aspects affect all stages of growth
from the ‘cradle to the grave.’ Cognitive development theory is directed at the mental aspect of growth and includes
memorizing and processing challenges or problems at every stage of human growth. This development domain includes
the capacity to analyze, evaluate and process decisions as and when they occur. This capacity to perceive and understand
is divided into stages or phases of development, occurring throughout the ‘cycle’ of life. This review turns to three of many
developmental theories, namely ‘Behavioral’, ‘Cognitive’ and ‘Sociocultural’. While analyzing these theories, the focus is
directed at how they impact and influence moral values and practices. Furthermore, more specific attention is targeted
towards how moral development theories have brought about human behavior changes. When ascertaining the relativity
of morality within human behavior, we aim to seek to determine how issues and theories relating to morality enables
ethical standards to be planned and implemented within the area of medicine and human services

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Moffitt TE. The New Look of Behavioral genetics in Developmental Psychopathology: Gene-Environment Interplay in Antisocial Behaviors. Psychological Bulletin 2005; 13: 533-54.
  2. 2. Hoffman HL. Empathy and Moral Development. Cambridge Press, 2000.
  3. 3. Roberts LW, Geppert C, Connor R, Nguyen K, Warner TD. An Invitation for Medical Educators to Focus on Ethical and Policy Issues in Research and Scholarly Practice. Acad Med 2001; 76: 876-85
  4. 4. Cronin P, Ryan F, Coughlan M. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing 2008; 17: 33.
  5. 5. Kohlberg L, Kauffman K, Scharf P, Hickey J. The Just Community Approach to Corrections: A Theory. Journal of Moral Education 1975; 243-260.
  6. 6. Gilligan C. In a different voice. Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
  7. 7. Vygotsky L. Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
  8. 8. National partnership. Improving Health Care Quality: Why You Should Get Involved and How You Can Make a Difference. Aligning Forces for Quality. United States Government. U.S., 2012

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Kevin Mccusker
United States

Ryan Mccusker
United States

Patricia Fanelli
United States

Owen Mccusker
United States

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Eylül 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Nisan 2021

Kabul Tarihi

5 Eylül 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Günaydın, S., Mccusker, K., Günaydın, D., Mccusker, R., Fanelli, P., & Mccusker, O. (2021). Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, 12(3), 357-360. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.992787
AMA
1.Günaydın S, Mccusker K, Günaydın D, Mccusker R, Fanelli P, Mccusker O. Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services. TJCL. 2021;12(3):357-360. doi:10.18663/tjcl.992787
Chicago
Günaydın, Serdar, Kevin Mccusker, Doğaç Günaydın, Ryan Mccusker, Patricia Fanelli, ve Owen Mccusker. 2021. “Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 12 (3): 357-60. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.992787.
EndNote
Günaydın S, Mccusker K, Günaydın D, Mccusker R, Fanelli P, Mccusker O (01 Eylül 2021) Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 12 3 357–360.
IEEE
[1]S. Günaydın, K. Mccusker, D. Günaydın, R. Mccusker, P. Fanelli, ve O. Mccusker, “Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services”, TJCL, c. 12, sy 3, ss. 357–360, Eyl. 2021, doi: 10.18663/tjcl.992787.
ISNAD
Günaydın, Serdar - Mccusker, Kevin - Günaydın, Doğaç - Mccusker, Ryan - Fanelli, Patricia - Mccusker, Owen. “Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 12/3 (01 Eylül 2021): 357-360. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.992787.
JAMA
1.Günaydın S, Mccusker K, Günaydın D, Mccusker R, Fanelli P, Mccusker O. Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services. TJCL. 2021;12:357–360.
MLA
Günaydın, Serdar, vd. “Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, c. 12, sy 3, Eylül 2021, ss. 357-60, doi:10.18663/tjcl.992787.
Vancouver
1.Serdar Günaydın, Kevin Mccusker, Doğaç Günaydın, Ryan Mccusker, Patricia Fanelli, Owen Mccusker. Analysis of theories impacting creation of ethical standards of practice in medicine and human services. TJCL. 01 Eylül 2021;12(3):357-60. doi:10.18663/tjcl.992787


e-ISSN: 2149-8296

The content of this site is intended for health care professionals. All the published articles are distributed under the terms of

Creative Commons Attribution Licence,

which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.