Indonesian Migrant Women Workers in Türkiye and Media Representation at Home: Precarity Works and Mediating the State Protection

Öz

This qualitative study examines the portrayal of Indonesian migrant women workers in Türkiye by major Indonesian online media outlets from 2019 to 2023. Using content analysis, the research explores dominant media representations surrounding workers in Türkiye's care service and tourism sectors. Findings reveal patterns of precarious work, exploitation, and vulnerability to undocumented employment, particularly involving Syrian employers. The study highlights a significant shift in media coverage from sensationalist reporting to echoing government narratives on combating undocumented migration. This shift aligns with Indonesia's labour-export policy reforms under President Jokowi, which aim to promote labour migration to formal sectors and distance the country's image from domestic worker exports. The research demonstrates how media reflects and reinforces state migrant protection policies through "domesticated protection." However, this approach inadvertently perpetuates victimization and potentially exacerbates vulnerabilities by stigmatizing unofficial migration channels. While intended to safeguard workers, stringent regulations may if not already contribute to increased undocumented migration. By analyzing the nexus between media representation, state policies, and migrant precarities, this study contributes to understanding the complex dynamics of labour migration in an emerging corridor, calling for a more nuanced approach to media coverage, policy-making, and future studies that acknowledges both migrant agency and structural challenges.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Türkiye
• Indonesia
• Migrant Women Workers
• Labour Migration

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical research practices. The research relied exclusively on publicly available media sources and did not involve direct interaction with human subjects. As such, it did not require formal ethical approval from an institutional review board. The author declares no conflicts of interest in relation to this research. The study was conducted independently without any external funding or influence from any organizations or individuals that could bias the research outcomes. All sources used in this study have been properly cited and credited. The analysis and conclusions drawn are based solely on the available data and the author's interpretation thereof. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy and objectivity of the information presented. However, it is acknowledged that media analysis inherently involves some degree of subjective interpretation. This research aims to contribute to the academic discourse on migrant workers' experiences and their media representation, with the ultimate goal of promoting better understanding and protection of migrant workers' rights.

Teşekkür

The study did not receive any support. There are no institutions or individuals to thank.

Kaynakça

1. Akalin, A. (2014). “We are the Legionaries!”: Filipina domestic workers in Istanbul. In D. Ö. Koçak & O. K. Koçak (Eds.), Whose city is that? Culture, design, spectacle and capital in Istanbul.
2. Ambrosini, M. (2016). Irregular migration and invisible welfare. Springer.
3. Andrijasevic, R. (2007). Beautiful dead bodies: Gender, migration and representation in anti-trafcking campaigns. Feminist Review, 86(1), 24-44.
4. Ayaydin, D. B. (2020). Found a nanny and lived happily ever after: Te representations of Filipino nannies on human resources agency websites in Türkiye. In F. K. Seiger, C. Timmerman, N. B. Salazar, & J. Wets (Eds.), Migration at work: Aspirations, imaginaries & structures of mobility (p. 171).https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16km21f.11
5. Bal, C. S., & Palmer, W. (2020). Indonesia and circular labor migration: Governance, remittances and multi-directional flows. Asian and Pacifc Migration Journal, 29 (1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0117196820925729
6. Çeltikci, M. (2022). Feminization of labor migration: Women migrant domestic workers from the Philippines in Türkiye. Eurasian Journal of Anthropology, 12 (1), 1-14. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eja/issue/70526/1107754
7. Cindyara, A. (2022, April 5). KBRI minta WNI tak terima pekerjaan ART di Turki seiring lonjakan TPPO. Antara. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2082554/kbri-minta-wni-tak-terimapekerjaan-art-di-turki-seiring-lonjakan-tppo
8. Çoban, S. (2023). Bakım rejimleri ve Türkiye’de bakım emeği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 455-465. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.1228210

9. Cohen, S. (2011). Folk devils and moral panics. Routledge.
10. De Haas, H., Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2019). Te age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Bloomsbury Publishing.
11. Deniz, A. (2018). Türkiye’ye Filipinli dadı göçü: Aracı frmaların rolünü anlamak. Coğraf Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000203
12. Deniz, A., & Özgür, E. M. (2010). Rusya’dan Türkiye’ye ulusaşiri göç: Antalya’daki Rus göçmenler. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 19(1), 13-30. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ecd/issue/4873/66899
13. Dewanto, P. A. (2020). Te domestication of protection: Te state and civil society in Indonesia’s overseas labor migration. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 176(4), 504-531. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-bja10018
14. Elias, J. (2010). Making migrant domestic work visible: Te rights based approach to migration and the ‘challenges of social reproduction’. Review of International Political Economy, 17(5), 840-859. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903573872
15. Gökmen, Ç. E. (2018). Turizm sektöründe göçmen emeği: Nitelikli emek mi? Ucuz emek mi?. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1(56), 139-166. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ct/issue/71799/1155257
16. Kavurmacı, A. (2022). Filipino migrant women in domestic work: A comparative evaluation among Turkiye, East Asian, and Middle Eastern countries. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 82, 357–382.https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1105587
17. Killias, O. (2018). Follow the maid: Domestic worker migration in and from Indonesia. NIAS Press.
18. Kunz, R. (2008). ‘Remittances are beautiful’? Gender implications of the new global remittances trend. Tird World Quarterly, 29(7), 1389-1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802386617
19. Malkki, L. H. (1995). Purity and exile: Violence, memory, and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. University of Chicago Press.
20. Malkki, L. (1996). Speechless emissaries: Refugees, humanitarianism, and dehistoricization. Cultural Anthropology, 11(3), 377–404.
21. Manning, C., & Pratomo, D. (2018). labor market developments in the Jokowi years. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35(2), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814843102-014
22. Marchetti, S., Cherubini, D., & Garofalo Geymonat, G. (2021). Global domestic workers. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.47674/9781529207903
23. Migrant CARE. (2017). Hasil survey mobilitas PRT migran pasca moratorium di Bandara Soekarno Hatta.https://migrantcare.net/2017/06/hasil-survey-mobilitas-prt-migran-pasca-moratorium-di-bandara-soekarno-hatta/
24. Musyaffa, I. (2023). Indonesia-Turki percepat pembaruan MoU ketenagakerjaan. Anadolu Ajansı. https://www.aa.com.tr/id/nasional/indonesia-turki-percepat-pembaruan-mou-ketenagakerjaan/1538308
25. Münz, R., Straubhaar, T., Vadean, F. P., & Vadean, N. (2007). What are the migrants’ contributions to employment and growth? A European approach (No. 3-3). HWWI Policy Paper.
26. Nikunen, K. (2019). Breaking the silence: From representations of victims and threat towards spaces of voice. In K. Smets, K. Leurs, M. Georgiou, S. Witteborn, & R. Gajjala (Eds.), Te SAGE handbook of media and migration (pp. 411-423). SAGE Publications.
27. Parreñas, R. S., Silvey, R., Hwang, M. C., & Choi, C. A. (2019). Serial labor migration: Precarity and itinerancy among Filipino and Indonesian domestic workers. International Migration Review, 53(4), 1230–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318804769
28. Piper, N., & Withers, M. (2018). Forced transnationalism and temporary labor migration: Implications for understanding migrant rights. Identities, 25(5), 558-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2018.1507957
29. Piore, M. J. (1979). Migrant labor and industrial societies. Cambridge University Press.
30. Platt, M. (2018). Migration, moralities and moratoriums: Women labor migrants and the tensions of protectionism in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 42(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2017.1408571
31. Silvey, R. (2004). Transnational migration and the gender politics of scale: Indonesian domestic workers in Saudi Arabia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00179.x
32. Silvey, R., & Parreñas, R. (2020). Precarity chains: Cycles of domestic worker migration from Southeast Asia to the Middle East. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(16), 3457–3471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1592398
33. Suliman, S. (2018). Migration and development after 2015. In Gabay, C., & Ilbay, S. (Eds.) Te politics of destination in the 2030 sustainable development goals (pp. 80-96). Routledge
34. T.C. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı (CSGB). (2023). Çalışma izin istatistikleri. https://www.csgb. gov.tr/istatistikler/calisma-hayati-istatistikleri/resmi-istatistik-programi/calisma-izin-istatistikleri/
35. Toksöz, G. (2020). Te gendered impacts of migration and welfare regimes: Migrant women workers in Türkiye. In L. Williams, E. Çoşkun, & S. Kaşka (Eds.), Women, migration, and asylum in Türkiye: Developing gender-sensitivity in migration research, policy, and practice (pp. 69-92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28887-7_4
36. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division. (2019). International migration 2019 highlights. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/news/internationalmigration-2019202
37. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division. (2020). International migration 2020 highlights. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/news/internationalmigration-2020
38. World Bank. (2017). Indonesia’s global workers: Juggling opportunities and risks. http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/946351511861382947/Indonesia-s-global-workers-juggling-opportunities-and-risks
39. Xiang, B., & Lindquist, J. (2014). Migration infrastructure. International Migration Review, 48(1_suppl), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12141
40. Yanuar, D. R. (2024). Indonesian circular labor migration to Türkiye: Understanding the rise and realities of Indonesian migrant workers’ employment in Antalya, Türkiye. [Unpublished manuscript]