Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method

Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4 29 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method

Öz

Joints are the most critical elements of furniture construction because the integrity of a furniture parts depends more on the strength performance of these joints than on any other factor. There are many types of joints used in wood furniture manufacturing, including dovetails, mortise and tenon, dowels, screws, metal plates, and so on. Dovetail joints, renowned for their high strength performance, are a commonly encountered method, especially in drawers, chairs, and tables. Dovetail joints are a preferred method of connection, especially in joints subjected to tensile loads. A study was conducted on the tensile strength of dovetail fasteners used to join the front and side sections of drawers in furniture intended for storage purposes. In this context, dovetail joint fasteners affecting tensile strength was measured and compared among fasteners commonly used in the market made from Poly amide (PA) material by injection method and those produced from tough Polylactic Acid (PLA) using a 3 D printer under laboratory conditions. Results indicated that the average tensile strength of 3D printed tough PLA dovetails is 2043 N while the average tensile strength of injected PA dovetail fasteners is 933 N.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Alaboodi, A.S., Sivasankaran, S., 2018. Experimental design and investigation on the mechanical behavior of novel 3D printed biocompatibility polycarbonate scaffolds for medical applications. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 35: 479-491.
  2. Boyla, O., 2012. Mobilya tarihi. Istanbul http:///C:/Users/USER/ Downloads/Oya_boyla_mobilya_tarihi.pdf,Accessed: 23.08.2025.
  3. Can, Ö., Önal, M.M., 2007. An investigation on the comparison of the compressive strength of corner joints of window which were prepared using first class yellow pine wood grew at the central Anatolia. Sigma, 25(3): 283-296.
  4. Carutasu, N.L., Simion, I., Carutasu, G., Jiga, G., Arion, A.F., 2015. Experimental test for elastic and mechanical evaluation of abs plastic used in 3D printing. Materiale Plastice, 52(3): 397-401.
  5. Chen, S., Lu, J., Feng, J., 2018. 3D-printable abs blends with improved scratch resistance and balanced mechanical performance. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(11): 3923-3931.
  6. Demirel, S., Zhang, J., 2014. Bending moment resistances of L-shaped two-gusset-plate furniture joints in oriented strandboard. Wood and Fiber Science, 46(3):356-367.
  7. Demirel, S., Erdem, M., Çava, K., Aslan, M., 2024a. The performance of 3D printed dowel with three different surface designs in furniture joints. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 25(1): 100-106.
  8. Demirel, S., Kuvel, N. T., Çava, K., Uşun, A., Aslan, M., 2024b. Considering tensile resistance of scot pine-MDF joint connected with 3d printed single dovetail fastener. Histrate Conference, 5-6 June, Istanbul, pp. 42-44.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ahşap İşleme

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Ağustos 2025

Kabul Tarihi

19 Kasım 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Demirel, S., & Manav, S. N. (2025). Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 26(4), 617-623. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.1772963
AMA
1.Demirel S, Manav SN. Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method. Turkish Journal of Forestry. 2025;26(4):617-623. doi:10.18182/tjf.1772963
Chicago
Demirel, Samet, ve Sümeyye Nur Manav. 2025. “Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method”. Turkish Journal of Forestry 26 (4): 617-23. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.1772963.
EndNote
Demirel S, Manav SN (01 Aralık 2025) Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method. Turkish Journal of Forestry 26 4 617–623.
IEEE
[1]S. Demirel ve S. N. Manav, “Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method”, Turkish Journal of Forestry, c. 26, sy 4, ss. 617–623, Ara. 2025, doi: 10.18182/tjf.1772963.
ISNAD
Demirel, Samet - Manav, Sümeyye Nur. “Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method”. Turkish Journal of Forestry 26/4 (01 Aralık 2025): 617-623. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.1772963.
JAMA
1.Demirel S, Manav SN. Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method. Turkish Journal of Forestry. 2025;26:617–623.
MLA
Demirel, Samet, ve Sümeyye Nur Manav. “Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method”. Turkish Journal of Forestry, c. 26, sy 4, Aralık 2025, ss. 617-23, doi:10.18182/tjf.1772963.
Vancouver
1.Samet Demirel, Sümeyye Nur Manav. Comparison of tensile strength of furniture dovetail fasteners produced with 3D printers and those produced with injection molding method. Turkish Journal of Forestry. 01 Aralık 2025;26(4):617-23. doi:10.18182/tjf.1772963