Multidisciplinary Approach Practices in Health Services: Family Medicine and Occupational Therapy

Öz

In health care, teamwork holds critical importance. Effective teamwork shortens patient survival and reduces readmission rates. Furthermore, teamwork effectively addresses challenges faced by health care providers, mitigating issues such as burnout and job dissatisfaction. Occupational therapy is a discipline that aims to improve the health and well-being of individuals through daily activities. This discipline helps people become independent in daily life and increase their social interactions. The integration of family medicine and occupational therapy emerges as a multidisciplinary methodology aimed at enhancing individuals' health and quality of life. The holistic and patient-centered relationship between family medicine and occupational therapy provides an opportunity to enhance the quality of life for individuals by addressing both medical and functional aspects of health. The wider recognition and integration of occupational therapy into healthcare systems could aid in maintaining and enhancing individuals' health.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• occupational therapy
• teamwork
• family practice
• multidisciplinary
• health services

Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Çok Disiplinli Yaklaşım Uygulamaları: Aile Hekimliği ve Ergoterapi

Öz

Sağlık hizmetlerinde takım çalışması, kritik bir öneme sahiptir. Etkili takım çalışması, hastaların hastanede kalma süresini kısaltır ve tekrar hastaneye yatma oranlarını azaltır. Buna ek olarak, takım çalışması sağlık hizmeti sunucularının karşılaştığı zorlukların üstesinden gelmekte ve tükenmişlik sendromu ile işle ilgili memnuniyetsizlik gibi olumsuz durumları hafifletmekte etkili olabilmektedir. Ergoterapi bireylerin sağlık ve esenliğini günlük aktivitelerle artırmayı amaçlayan bir disiplindir. Bu disiplin, insanların günlük yaşamda bağımsız olmalarına ve sosyal etkileşimlerini artırmalarına yardımcı olur. Aile hekimliği ile ergoterapinin entegrasyonu, bireylerin sağlık ve yaşam kalitesini artırma amacı güden multidisipliner bir metodoloji olarak öne çıkar. Aile hekimliği genel sağlık ihtiyaçlarını ele alırken, ergoterapi bireyin kendine bakım, iş, üretken aktiviteler, oyun ve boş zaman etkinliklerindeki bağımsızlığını destekler. Bu iki disiplinin iş birliği, hastalara kapsamlı bir sağlık bakımı sunulmasını mümkün kılar. Aile hekimliği ve ergoterapi arasındaki bütüncül ve hasta merkezli ilişki, bireylerin sağlığını hem tıbbi hem de fonksiyonel açıdan ele alarak yaşam kalitesini artırma fırsatı sunar. Ergoterapinin daha geniş bir tanınırlığa kavuşması ve sağlık sistemlerine daha entegre bir biçimde dahil edilmesi bireylerin sağlıklarını koruma ve geliştirme kapasitelerine katkıda bulunabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ergoterapi
• takım çalışması
• sağlık hizmetleri
• aile hekimliği
• çok disiplinli yaklaşımlar

Kaynakça

1. 1. Atıcı E. Hasta - Hekim İlişkisi Kavramı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;33(1):45-50.
2. 2. World HealthOrganization. Familymedicine : Report of a regional scientific working group meeting on core curriculum colombo, Sri Lanka, 9-13 July 2003 [Internet].; [Erişim tarihi: 15 Nisan 2023]. Erişim adresi: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/205063
3. 3. World HealthOrganization. Constitution of the World HealthOrganization 2006. [Internet].. Erişim tarihi: 15 Nisan 2023. Erişim adresi: http://apps. who. int/gb/bd/PDF/bd47/EN/constitution-en. pdf
4. 4. American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process-fourth edition. Am J OccupTher [Internet]. 2020; 74(Supplement_2): 7412410010p1–87. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
5. 5. Alotaibi N, Shayea A, Nadar M, Abu Tariah H. Investigation into health science students’ awareness of occupational therapy: implications for interprofessional education. J AlliedHealth. 2015 Spring;44(1):3–9.
6. 6. Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, Dietz AS, Benishek LE, Thompson D, Pronovost PJ, et al. Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. AmPsychol [Internet]. 2018;73(4):433–50. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000298
7. 7. Buljac-Samardzic M, Doekhie KD, vanWijngaarden JDH. Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade. Hum Resour Health [Internet]. 2020;18(1):2. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3
8. 8. Welp A, Manser T. Integratingteamwork, clinicianoccupationalwell-beingandpatientsafety – development of a conceptualframeworkbased on a systematicreview. BMC HealthServRes [Internet]. 2016;16(1). Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1535-y

9. 9. Martin AK, Green TL, McCarthy AL, Sowa PM, Laakso E-L. Health care teams: Terminology, confusion, and ramifications. J Multidiscip Healthc [Internet]. 2022;15:765–72. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S342197
10. 10. Cobb M. Transdisciplinary approaches to spiritual care: A chaplain’sperspective. ProgPalliatCare [Internet]. 2012;20(2):94–7. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743291x12y.0000000021
11. 11. Taberna M, GilMoncayo F, Jané-Salas E, Antonio M, Arribas L, Vilajosana E, et al. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Front Oncol [Internet]. 2020;10:85. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00085
12. 12. Strunk J, Leisen M, Schubert C. Using a multidisciplinary approach with children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. J Interprof Educ Pract [Internet]. 2017;8:60–8. Availablefrom: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2017.03.009
13. 13. Carbone PS, Farley M, Davis T. Primarycareforchildrenwithautism. AmFamPhysician. 2010;81(4):453–60.
14. 14. Bowman KS, Suarez VD, Weiss MJ. Standardsforinterprofessionalcollaboration in thetreatment of individualswithautism. Behav Anal Pract [Internet]. 2021;14(4):1191–208. Availablefrom: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00560-0
15. 15. Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A. Ten principles of goodinterdisciplinaryteamwork. Hum ResourHealth [Internet]. 2013;11(1):19. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-19
16. 16. Clarke DJ, Forster A. Improving post-stroke recovery: the role of the multidisciplinary health care team. J MultidiscipHealthc [Internet]. 2015;8:433–42. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S68764
17. 17. Carvalho L, de Almeida IC, Felgueiras I, Leitão S, Boavida J, Santos PC, et al. Recommended Practices in Early Childhood Intervention: A guide book for professionals [Internet]. Lüksemburg: EURLYAID — E.A.E.C.I; 2020. Erişim adresi: https://www.eurlyaid.eu/eciguidebook-englishversion/
18. 18. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Definitions of Occupational Therapy from Member Organisations [Internet]. [Erişim tarihi: 15 Nisan 2023]. Erişim adresi: https://wfot.org/resources/definitions-of-occupational-therapy-from-member-organisations
19. 19. Akı E, Özkan E. Ergoterapiye Giriş. Ankara: Hipokrat Yayıncılık; 2020; p. 9-18
20. 20. Ferrara L, Flammia A. Ergotherapy, the Occupational Therapy as an Aidto Return to Being by Doing. Hum Journals. 2018;9(2)
21. 21. Akyurek G, Kars S, Celik Z, Koc C, Cesim ÖB. AssistiveTechnology in Occupational Therapy [Internet]. Occupational Therapy – Occupation Focused Holistic Practice in Rehabilitation. InTech; 2017. Availablefrom: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68471
22. 22. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. About Occupational Therapy [Internet]. [Erişim tarihi: 15 Nisan 2023]. Erişim adresi: https://wfot.org/about/about-occupational-therapy
23. 23. Fisher AG, Griswold LA. Performance skills: Implementing performance analyses to evaluate quality of occupational performance. In: Schell BAB, Gillen G, editors. Willard and Spackman’soccupationaltherapy. 13th ed. Philadelphia: WoltersKluwer; 2019. p. 335–350.
24. 24. Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerfulpractice: A model for authentic occupational therapy. Fort Collins, CO: Center forInnovative OT Solutions; 2019. p. 1-370
25. 25. American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain andprocess. 2nd ed. Am J OccupTher. 2008;62:625–683. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.6.625
26. 26. Robinson M, Fisher TF, Broussard K. Role of Occupational Therapy in Case Management and Care Coordination for Clients With Complex Conditions. Am J OccupTher. 2016 Mar-Apr;70(2):7002090010p1-6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.702001.
27. 27. Pousada García T, Loureiro JP, González BG, Nieto-Rivero L. Assistive technology based on client-centered for occupational performance in neuromuscular conditions. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(25):e15983. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015983.
28. 28. Clark GF, Avery-Smith W, Wold LS, Anthony P, Holm SE; Eating and Feeding Task Force;Commission on Practice. Specialized knowledge and skills in feeding, eating, and swallowing for occupational therapy practice. Am J OccupTher. 2007 Nov-Dec;61(6):686-700. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.6.686.
29. 29. Rakel RE, Rakel D. Textbook of familymedicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2015; p. 3-16
30. 30. Ortiz MR. Patient-CenteredMedical (health) Home: Nursingtheory-guidedpolicyperspectives. NursSci Q [Internet]. 2020;33(1):91–6. Availablefrom: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894318419881795
31. 31. Donnelly, C., Brenchley, C., Crawford, C. et al. Theintegration of occupational therapy into primary care: a multiple casestudydesign. BMC FamPract 14, 60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-60
32. 32. Geese F, Schmitt K-U. Interprofessional Collaboration in Complex Patient Care Transition: A Qualitative Multi-Perspective Analysis. Healthcare. 2023; 11(3):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030359
33. 33. Penelope A. Moyers, Christina A. Metzler; Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Care Coordination. Am J Occup Ther September/October 2014, Vol. 68(5), 500–505. doi: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.685002