Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

İDENTİFY RİSK BEHAVİORS OF STUDENTS HİGH SCHOOLS

Yıl 2021, , 743 - 750, 20.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.938266

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this descriptive and cross-sectional study is to identify the risk behaviors of adolescents attending high schools in Şanlıurfa. Methods: The population of this study was 44217 students in high schools in Şanlıurfa. The minimum sample size of the study according to the known population sampling formula was calculated as approximately 1000 participants. Within the scope of the stratified sampling method, the number of students going to high schools in each district was determined. A high school was chosen from each district using the simple random sampling method. The data of the study were obtained by using a “Socio-Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire” and the “Risky Behaviors Scale”. Descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U test, and Kruskal Wallis H test were used to analyze the data. Results: The finding that the students had a high mean score of 144±22.2 on the Risky Behaviors Scale revealed that the students in the study engaged in a variety of risky behaviors. The sub-behavior in the scale with the largest mean value was alcohol consumption with the mean score of 32.7±5.0. The students at higher grades tended to show fewer risky behaviors (p<0.05). Those who had more educated fathers showed fewer anti-social behaviors (p<0.05). In this study, female students, those under the age of 15, prep-school students, and 9th graders had a higher median score for the sub-behavior of smoking. (p<0.05). Male students had a higher risk of suicide than female students. (p<0.05). The median score for smoking was higher for those who did not work outside the school (p<0.05). The level of tendencies towards risky behaviors were higher for the students who enjoyed school and attended classes in comparison to those who did not like school and skipped classes (p<0.05). Conclusion: As a result, risky behaviors were found to be common among the students, and these behaviors were found to be affected by the students’ socio-demographic characteristics. In this regard, establishing nurse-led school health initiatives is advocated.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Çoban AE. Investigation of Turkish adolescents emotional autonomy in terms of some demographic variables. Educatıon and Scıence.2013; 38 (169): 357-371
  • 2. T.C. Ministry of Family and Social Policies, General Directorate of Family and Community Services. Turkey Profile of Adolescent Research 2013. Uzerler Publish, First Edition. 2014. Ankara.
  • 3. Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States. MMWR. 2013; 63: 1–168.
  • 4. Santrock JW. Adolescence. (Edit) Diyez DM. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. 2012; 12-25.
  • 5. Gençtanırım D, Ergene T. Prediction of risk behaviours among Turkish adolescents. Education and Science. 2017; 42 (189): 137-152.
  • 6. Özdemir Y, Çok F. Autonomy Development in Adolescence. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2011; 36(4): 152-164.
  • 7. Parlaz EA, Tekgül N, Karademirci E, Öngel K. Ergenlik dönemi: fiziksel büyüme, psikolojik ve sosyal gelişim süreci. The Journal of Turkish Family Physician.2012; 3(4):10-17.
  • 8. Akça SO, Selen F. Risky behaviors of adolescent boys: A high school sample. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2016; 15(3): 206-212.
  • 9. Şimşek H, Çöplü F. The examination of the relationship between the levels of showing risky behaviors and the levels of attachment to school of high school students. Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Journal. 2018; 4(1): 18-30.
  • 10. Gençtanırım D, Ergene T. Development rısk behavıours scale: vadılıty and relıabılıty studıes. International Journal of Social Science. 2014; 25(1): 125-138..
  • 11. Kurtuncu M, Uzun M, Ayoğlu FN. The effect of adolescent training program on risky health behaviours and health perception. Journal of Higher Education and Science. 2015; 5(2): 187-195.
  • 12. Örsal Ö, Emiroğlu O. Legal ısssues related to school health services and school health nursing in Turkey: a critical analysis. Turkey Clinical Journal of Public Health Nursing Special Topics. 2016; 2(1): 79-95.
  • 13. Reads C. A branch of public health nursery: school health nursing. Turkey Clinical J Public Health Nurs-Special Topics. 2016; 2(1): 15-22
  • 14. Körük, S. (2016). Determine the mediator role of psychological symptoms on the predictive stenght of perceived social support and insecure attachment styles on the risky behaviours among adolescents. (Unpublish Master Thesis). Osmangazi University. Eskişehir.
  • 15. Eneçcan FN, Şahin EM, Erdal M, Aktürk Z, Kara M. Evaluation of the health risk behaviors of high school students in Edirne. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2011; 10(6): 687-700.
  • 16. Çavuş FÖ, Çavuş UY, Görpelioğlu S. Prevalence, distribution and influencing factors of risky behaviour in Ankara. Turkey Journal of Family Practice. 2017; 21(1): 2-16.
  • 17. Tansel L, Bülent A. Examining High School Students Attitudes Towards Addictive Substances. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 2017; 10(2): 1453-1472
  • 18. Akkuş D, Karaca A, Şener DK, Ankaralı H. The prevalence of tobacco and alcohol use in high school students and the affecting factors. Anadolu Clin. 2017; 22(1): 36-45.
  • 19. Ekşi H, Arıcan T, Yaman G. The perfectionizm and social appearance anxiety as being the prediction of risky behavior on vocational high school students. KEFAD. 2016; 17(2): 527-545.
  • 20. Henry KL, Slater MD. The Contextual effect of school attachment on young adolescents alcoholuse. Journal of School Health, 2007;77(2): 67-74.
  • 21. Muscatello MR, Scimeca G, Pandolfo G, et al. Executive functions and basic symptoms in adolescent antisocial behavior: a cross-sectional study on an Italian sample of late-on set off enders. Compr Psychiatry 2014;55(3):631-638.
  • 22. Adewuya AO, Ola BA, Coker OA, et al. Prevalence and associated factors for suicidaly deation in the lagos state mental health survey, Nigeria. BJ Psych Open 2016;2(6):385-389.
  • 23. McVicar D, Polanski A. Peer effects in UK Adolescent Substance Use: Nevermind The Classmates, Oxford Bull Econ Stat. 2014;76(4):589–604.
  • 24. Kahraman S. Karataş H. The Existing State Analysis of Working Children on the Street in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Iran J Public Health. 2018; 47(9): 1299-1306.
  • 25. Frey A, Ruchkin V, Martin A. And Schwab-Stone M. Adolescents in Transition: School and Family Characteristics in The Development of Violent Behaviors Entering High School. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2009; 40(1): 1-13.

Lise Öğrencilerinin Riskli Davranışlarının Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2021, , 743 - 750, 20.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.938266

Öz

Amaç: Tanımlayıcı olarak yapılan bu araştırmanın amacı; Şanlıurfa’da liseye giden ergenlerin riskli davranışlarını belirlemektir. Bu araştırmanın evreni, Şanlıurfa Merkez’de liseye giden 44217 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Yöntem: Araştırmanın evreni 44217 lise öğrencisidir. Evreni bilinen örneklem formülüne göre araştırmanın minimum örneklem büyüklüğü 1000 kişidir. İlin merkez ilçelerini kapsayacak şekilde her bir ilçeden basit rastgele örneklem yöntemine göre bir lise seçilmiştir. Her sınıftan öğrenci olması amacıyla liselerden öğrenci seçimi yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri; ‘‘Sosyo-demografik Özellikler Anket Formu’’ ve ‘‘Riskli Davranışlar Ölçeği” kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde; tanımlayıcı istatistikler, Mann Whitneu U, Kruskal Wall H testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin riskli davranışları ölçekten aldıkları toplam puan ortalamasının 144±22,2 olduğu, bu puan ortalamasının yüksek olması, araştırmaya katılan ergenlerin riskli davranışların yoğunluğuna işaret etmektedir. Riskli davranışlar ölçeği alt boyutlarından en yüksek puan ortalamasına sahip 32.7±5,0 ile alkol kullanımı olarak belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin sınıf seviyesi ilerledikçe riskli davranışlarda bulunma azalmıştır (p<0,05). Baba eğitim düzeyi arttıkça anti-sosyal davranışın azaldığı tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Bu çalışmada sigara kullanımı alt boyut ortancası kızlarda, 15 yaş ve altı bireylerde, hazırlık ve 9.sınıf öğrencilerinde daha yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Erkek öğrencilerin, kız öğrencilerden daha fazla intihar eğilimi olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<). Çalışmayan öğrencilerde sigara kullanma puan ortancasının, çalışanlarda daha yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Okulu seven ve okula devamsızlık yapmayanların riskli davranışlara eğilimi, okulu sevmeyen ve devamsızlık yapana oranla daha yüksek çıkmıştır (p<0,05). Sonuç: Sonuç olarak öğrencilerin riskli davranışlarının yaygın olduğu, bu davranışların öğrenci sosyo-demografik özelliklerinden etkilendiği bulunmuştur. Bu çerçevede hemşireler tarafından okul sağlığı programlarına başlanması önerilmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Çoban AE. Investigation of Turkish adolescents emotional autonomy in terms of some demographic variables. Educatıon and Scıence.2013; 38 (169): 357-371
  • 2. T.C. Ministry of Family and Social Policies, General Directorate of Family and Community Services. Turkey Profile of Adolescent Research 2013. Uzerler Publish, First Edition. 2014. Ankara.
  • 3. Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States. MMWR. 2013; 63: 1–168.
  • 4. Santrock JW. Adolescence. (Edit) Diyez DM. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. 2012; 12-25.
  • 5. Gençtanırım D, Ergene T. Prediction of risk behaviours among Turkish adolescents. Education and Science. 2017; 42 (189): 137-152.
  • 6. Özdemir Y, Çok F. Autonomy Development in Adolescence. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2011; 36(4): 152-164.
  • 7. Parlaz EA, Tekgül N, Karademirci E, Öngel K. Ergenlik dönemi: fiziksel büyüme, psikolojik ve sosyal gelişim süreci. The Journal of Turkish Family Physician.2012; 3(4):10-17.
  • 8. Akça SO, Selen F. Risky behaviors of adolescent boys: A high school sample. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2016; 15(3): 206-212.
  • 9. Şimşek H, Çöplü F. The examination of the relationship between the levels of showing risky behaviors and the levels of attachment to school of high school students. Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Journal. 2018; 4(1): 18-30.
  • 10. Gençtanırım D, Ergene T. Development rısk behavıours scale: vadılıty and relıabılıty studıes. International Journal of Social Science. 2014; 25(1): 125-138..
  • 11. Kurtuncu M, Uzun M, Ayoğlu FN. The effect of adolescent training program on risky health behaviours and health perception. Journal of Higher Education and Science. 2015; 5(2): 187-195.
  • 12. Örsal Ö, Emiroğlu O. Legal ısssues related to school health services and school health nursing in Turkey: a critical analysis. Turkey Clinical Journal of Public Health Nursing Special Topics. 2016; 2(1): 79-95.
  • 13. Reads C. A branch of public health nursery: school health nursing. Turkey Clinical J Public Health Nurs-Special Topics. 2016; 2(1): 15-22
  • 14. Körük, S. (2016). Determine the mediator role of psychological symptoms on the predictive stenght of perceived social support and insecure attachment styles on the risky behaviours among adolescents. (Unpublish Master Thesis). Osmangazi University. Eskişehir.
  • 15. Eneçcan FN, Şahin EM, Erdal M, Aktürk Z, Kara M. Evaluation of the health risk behaviors of high school students in Edirne. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2011; 10(6): 687-700.
  • 16. Çavuş FÖ, Çavuş UY, Görpelioğlu S. Prevalence, distribution and influencing factors of risky behaviour in Ankara. Turkey Journal of Family Practice. 2017; 21(1): 2-16.
  • 17. Tansel L, Bülent A. Examining High School Students Attitudes Towards Addictive Substances. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 2017; 10(2): 1453-1472
  • 18. Akkuş D, Karaca A, Şener DK, Ankaralı H. The prevalence of tobacco and alcohol use in high school students and the affecting factors. Anadolu Clin. 2017; 22(1): 36-45.
  • 19. Ekşi H, Arıcan T, Yaman G. The perfectionizm and social appearance anxiety as being the prediction of risky behavior on vocational high school students. KEFAD. 2016; 17(2): 527-545.
  • 20. Henry KL, Slater MD. The Contextual effect of school attachment on young adolescents alcoholuse. Journal of School Health, 2007;77(2): 67-74.
  • 21. Muscatello MR, Scimeca G, Pandolfo G, et al. Executive functions and basic symptoms in adolescent antisocial behavior: a cross-sectional study on an Italian sample of late-on set off enders. Compr Psychiatry 2014;55(3):631-638.
  • 22. Adewuya AO, Ola BA, Coker OA, et al. Prevalence and associated factors for suicidaly deation in the lagos state mental health survey, Nigeria. BJ Psych Open 2016;2(6):385-389.
  • 23. McVicar D, Polanski A. Peer effects in UK Adolescent Substance Use: Nevermind The Classmates, Oxford Bull Econ Stat. 2014;76(4):589–604.
  • 24. Kahraman S. Karataş H. The Existing State Analysis of Working Children on the Street in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Iran J Public Health. 2018; 47(9): 1299-1306.
  • 25. Frey A, Ruchkin V, Martin A. And Schwab-Stone M. Adolescents in Transition: School and Family Characteristics in The Development of Violent Behaviors Entering High School. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2009; 40(1): 1-13.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Birinci Basamak Sağlık Hizmetleri
Bölüm Orijinal Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zeynep Danış 0000-0003-2622-2413

Selma Kahraman 0000-0002-4486-6629

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 17 Mayıs 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Danış Z, Kahraman S. İDENTİFY RİSK BEHAVİORS OF STUDENTS HİGH SCHOOLS. TJFMPC. 2021;15(4):743-50.

Sağlığın ve birinci basamak bakımın anlaşılmasına ve geliştirilmesine katkıda bulunacak yeni bilgilere sahip yazarların İngilizce veya Türkçe makaleleri memnuniyetle karşılanmaktadır.

Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care © 2024 by Aile Hekimliği Akademisi Derneği is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0