Ortaokul Öğrencilerinde Okul Yaşam Kalitesi ve Saldırganlık Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 236 - 243, 20.06.2021

Zeynep Temel Mert , İlknur Yıldız , Nurcan Akgül Gündoğdu

https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.816198

Cited By: 1

Öz

Okul yaşamının kalitesi ve saldırganlığın okul sağlık hizmetleri açısından birbirini etkilediği söylenebilir. Bu çalışma ortaokul öğrencilerinin okul yaşamı kalitesi ve saldırganlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu tanımlayıcı kesitsel araştırmanın örneklemini şehir merkezindeki üç ortaokula giden 822 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri “Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Okul Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği ve Buss-Perry Saldırganlık Ölçeği” kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde sıklık, yüzde, t testi, ANOVA testi ve lojistik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin %56.2’si kız ve %43.8’i erkek olup, ortalama yaş 12.64 ± 1.04 olarak bulunmuştur. Öğrenciler arasında cinsiyet, okul başarısı, arkadaşlık ilişkileri ve ortalama okul yaşam kalitesi ile saldırganlık puanları arasında anlamlı fark vardır. Okullarda öfkenin önlenmesi ve kontrolü için risk düzeylerine göre öğrenci-aile ve okul yönetimi arasında işbirliği sağlayan projelerin oluşturulması önerilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ortaokul öğrencileri, okul yaşam kalitesi, okul sağlığı hemşireliği, ilişki

The Relationship Between Secondary School Students' Quality of School Life and Aggression Level

Öz

This study aimed to determine the relationship between quality of school life and aggression levels of secondary school students. The sample of the descriptive-cross-sectional study consisted of 822 students in three secondary schools of a city center in Turkey. The data of research were collected with “Personal Information Form, School Life Quality, Buss-Perry Aggression Scale”. Frequency, percentage, t test, ANOVA test and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the data. Of all students 56.2% were female, 43.8% were male, and the mean age was 12.64 ± 1.04. There was a significant difference between the students’ gender, school achievement, friendship relations, school life quality, aggression mean scores. In order to prevent aggression in schools, it can be suggested to create tools that provide cooperation between student-family, school management according to the risk levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

secondary school student ,, aggression, school life quality, school health nursing, relationship

Kaynakça

• 1. Özdemir Y, Koruklu N. Parental attachment, school attachment and life satisfaction in early adolescence. Elementary Education Online. 2013;12:836‐848.
• 2. Sarı M. Assesment of school life: Reliability and validity of quality of school life scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. 2012;42:344-55.
• 3. Barnes TN. Changing the landscape of social emotional learning in urban schools: what are we currently focusing on and where do we go from here?, Urban Rev. 2019;51:599-637.
• 4. Elitok-Kesici A, Ceylan V.K. Quality of school life in Turkey, Finland and South Korea. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). 2020;9(1):100-108.
• 5. Erden A, Erdem M. School life quality at primary schools: case of van province. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. 2013;28:151-165.
• 6. Karadağ M, Altınay Aksal F. Altınay-Gazi Z. Dağlı G. Effect size of spiritual leadership: in the process of school culture and academic success. SAGE Open. 2020;1-14.
• 7. Mok MMC, Flyyn M. Determinants of students’ quality of school life: a path model. Learning Environments Research. 2002;5:275-300.
• 8. Donat Bacıoğlu S, Özdemir Y. Aggressive behaviors in elementary students and their relationship to age, gender, academic success and anger. Journal of Educational Sciences Research. 2012;2:169–187.
• 9. Sili A. The sociological analysis of the secondary education students’ aggressive behaviors. EKEV Akademi Journal. 2012;5:261-272.
• 10. Yavuzer Y, Karataş Z. The mediating role of anger in the relationship between automatic thoughts and physical aggression in adolescents. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;1-7.
• 11. Gönültaş O, Atıcı M. An investigation of anger and aggression levels of middle school last class students’ regarding some variables. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences. 2014;23:370-386.
• 12. Lee K, Baillargeon RH, Vermunt JK, Wu H, Trmblay RE. Age differences in the prevalence of physical aggression among 5-11-year old Canadian boys and girls. Aggressive Behavior. 2007;33:26-37.
• 13. Uz Baş A, Topçu-Kabasakal Z. The prevalence of aggressive and violent behaviors among elementary school students Elementary Education Online. 2010;9:93-105.
• 14. Estévez E, Jiménez TI, Moreno D. Aggressive behavior in adolescence as a predictor of personal, family, and school adjustment problems. Psicothema. 2018; 30(1):66-73.
• 15. Han G, Park J. Role of the flow in physical education class between school life stress and aggressiveness among adolescents. Sustainability. 2020;12(4241):1-10.
• 16. Sezer A, Kolaç N, Erol S. The relationship between a primary school fourth, fifth, sixth grade students’ aggressiveness levels, parent attitudes and some variables. Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences. 2013;3:184-190.
• 17. Yavuzer Y. Violence and aggression in schools: risk factors related to teachers and schools and prevention strategies. National Education Journal. 2011;92:43-61.
• 18. Lineberry MJ, Ickes MJ. The role and impact of nurses in American elementary schools: a systematic review of the research. J Sch Nurs. 2015;31:22-33.
• 19. Turkey's Health Ministry, Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Okul Sağlığı Kitabı, [https://www.saglik.gov.tr, accessed:22.09.2020]
• 20. Demirtaş-Madran A. The reliability and validity of the buss-perry aggression questionnaire. (BAQ)-Turkish Version Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;24:124-129.
• 21. Eccles JS, Roeser RW. Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2011;21(1):225- 241
• 22. Arıkan G, Sarı M. Examination of quality of school life in high school student. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies (IntJCES). 2016; 2(1):66-77.
• 23. Gedik A, Cömert M. School life quality in secondary school students. Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences. 2018; 22:989-1006.
• 24. Kıran-Esen B. Examination of students’ risk taking behavior and school successes according to peer pressure levels and genders. The Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2003;2:17-26.
• 25. Akgül-Gündoğdu N, Güler N, Kocataş S, Güler G. The relation between quality of school life and peer pressure of primary six, seven and eight grade students. Turkiye Klinikleri J Public Health Nurs-Special Topics. 2016;2:61-67.
• 26. Kaya A, Sezgin M. Prediction of middle school students’ happiness by educational stress and quality of school life. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. 2017;41:245-264.
• 27. Lin T, Lv H. The effects of family income on children’s education: An empirical analysis of CHNS data. Research on Modern Higher Education. 2017;4:49-54.
• 28. Selvitopu A. Examining the quality of school life perceptions of vocational school students. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. 2018;47:225-246.
• 29. Amedahe FK, Owusu-Banahene NO. Sex differences in the forms of aggression among adolescent students in Ghana. Research in Education. 2007;78:54-64.
• 30. Çetinkaya Yıldız E, Hatipoğlu-Sümer Z. Perceived neighborhood risk, neighborhood safety and school climate in predicting aggressive behaviors. The Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 2010;4:161-173.
• 31. Avcı D, Kılıç M, Tarı-Selçuk K. Uzunçakmak T. Levels of aggression among Turkish adolescents and factors leading to aggression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2016;37:476-484.
• 32. Browser J, Larson JD, Bellmore A, Olson C, Resnik F. Bullying victimization type and feeling unsafe in middle school. The Journal of School Nursing. 2018;34:256-262.
• 33. Kabasakal Z, Uz-Baş A. Research on some variables regarding the frequency of violent and aggressive behaviors among elementary school students and their families. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;2:582-586.
• 34. Lösel F, Farrington DF. Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2012;43:8-23.
• 35. Venter M, Poggenpoel M. The phenomenon of aggressive behavior of learners in the school situation. Phenomenom of Aggresive Behavior. 2006;126:312-315.