EN
TR
Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center
Öz
Objective: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a bacterium that infects more than half of the world's population and is defined as a class 1 carcinogen by the World Health Organization. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of treatments in patients with H. pylori positivity who were treated with a modified sequential treatment regimen containing levofloxacin or a bismuth-based quadruple treatment regimen in a secondary state hospital. Method: This study includes retrospective analysis of 167 patients who received and tolerated H. pylori eradication therapy between April 2021 and April 2022. The patients included in the study were divided into two groups according to the treatment regimen they received. Patients given a modified sequential treatment regimen containing levofloxacin (amoxicillin 1 g 2x1, pantoprazole 40 mg 2x1 for 7 days, followed by pantoprazole 40 mg 2x1 for 7 days, metronidazole 500 mg 3x1, levofloxacin 500 mg 1x1) Group 1 and the patients who were given bismuth-based quadruple therapy (14 days pantoprazole 40 mg 2x1, bismuth subsalicylate 262 mg 2x2, metronidazole 500 mg 3x1 and tetracycline 500 mg 4x1) were determined as Group 2.
Results: A total of 14 patients (one in group 1 and 13 in group 2) could not tolerate H.pylori treatment, and eradication was achieved in 83 (90.2%) in group 1 and 70 (93.3%) in group 2 of 167 patients who completed the treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in eradication success rates in both treatment protocols (p=.470). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in terms of age, gender, indications for endoscopy, endoscopic diagnoses, pathological findings, and eradication indications.
Conclusion: Considering the eradication success rates found in our study, it supports that the modified sequential treatment regimen containing levofloxacin may be an alternative to bismuth-based treatment in the first-line treatment in our country, or a second-line treatment in patients who cannot tolerate bismuth-based treatment. However, further studies on modified sequential therapy containing levofloxacin are needed.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
yok
Proje Numarası
yok
Kaynakça
- 1. Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1984;1:1311-5.
- 2. Lawson AJ. Helicobacter. In: Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW, eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2011:900-15.
- 3. Goh KL, Chan WK, Shiota S, Yamaoka Y. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection and public health implications. Helicobacter. 2011;16Suppl 1(01):1–9.
- 4. Eusebi LH, Zagari RM, Bazzoli F. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2014;19 Suppl 1:1–5
- 5.Brown LM. Helicobacter pylori: epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(3):283-97
- 6. Craanen ME, Dekker W, Blok P, Ferwerda J, Tytgat GN. Intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori: an endoscopic bioptic study of the gastric antrum. Gut. 1992;33:16-20.
- 7.Weck MN, Brenner H. Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with chronic atrophic gastritis: Meta-analyses according to type of disease definition. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:874-81.
- 8. Megraud F, Lehours P. Helicobacter pylori detection and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(2):280-322.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
28 Mart 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi
2 Şubat 2023
Kabul Tarihi
24 Şubat 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1
APA
Çelik, F., & Şenkaya, A. (2023). Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center. Turkish Journal of Health Science and Life, 6(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.56150/tjhsl.1246441
AMA
1.Çelik F, Şenkaya A. Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center. TJHSL. 2023;6(1):32-38. doi:10.56150/tjhsl.1246441
Chicago
Çelik, Ferit, ve Ali Şenkaya. 2023. “Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center”. Turkish Journal of Health Science and Life 6 (1): 32-38. https://doi.org/10.56150/tjhsl.1246441.
EndNote
Çelik F, Şenkaya A (01 Mart 2023) Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center. Turkish Journal of Health Science and Life 6 1 32–38.
IEEE
[1]F. Çelik ve A. Şenkaya, “Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center”, TJHSL, c. 6, sy 1, ss. 32–38, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.56150/tjhsl.1246441.
ISNAD
Çelik, Ferit - Şenkaya, Ali. “Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center”. Turkish Journal of Health Science and Life 6/1 (01 Mart 2023): 32-38. https://doi.org/10.56150/tjhsl.1246441.
JAMA
1.Çelik F, Şenkaya A. Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center. TJHSL. 2023;6:32–38.
MLA
Çelik, Ferit, ve Ali Şenkaya. “Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center”. Turkish Journal of Health Science and Life, c. 6, sy 1, Mart 2023, ss. 32-38, doi:10.56150/tjhsl.1246441.
Vancouver
1.Ferit Çelik, Ali Şenkaya. Evaluation of the efficacy of two different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens at a secondary public health care center. TJHSL. 01 Mart 2023;6(1):32-8. doi:10.56150/tjhsl.1246441