Araştırma Makalesi

Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 26 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye

Öz

This paper presents an analysis of air pollution in Turkey over a ten-year period. The study was carried out to determine the concentrations of specific pollutants in the atmosphere by analyzing the Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Sulfate (SO4), Organic Carbon Scattering (OCS) and Total Aerosol Angstrom parameter components obtained from MERRA-2 satellite imagery. SO2 and SO4 represent the mass densities of sulphate components in the atmosphere, while organic carbon represents atmospheric carbon scattering. The aerosol Angstrom parameter provides important information on particle size and distribution. The most moderate correlation was found between SO4 and OCS (R value 0.63). Analyzing these parameters is an important step to understand their impacts and changes on air quality in Turkey. Ten years of Land Surface Temperature (LST) data were obtained from Modis images. SO4 was highly correlated with LST (R value: 0.85) and OCS was moderately correlated with LST (R value 0.58). This study aims to analyze the air pollution profile in depth and identify seasonal/long-term trends, focusing on the analysis of long-term data. This analysis provides an important contribution to provide a scientifically based basis for air quality management and environmental policy development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teşekkür

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments and suggestions regarding this article.

Kaynakça

  1. Aykaç Ö. H., & Öbekcan, H. (2023). Short-term estimations of PM10 concentration in the Middle Black Sea region based on grey prediction models. CLEAN Soil, Air, Water, 51(10), 2200400.
  2. Bian, H., Colarco, P. R., Chin, M., Chen, G., Rodriguez, J. M., Liang, Q., Blake, D., Chu, D. A., Silva, A., Darmenov, A. S., Diskin, G., Fuelberg, H. E., Huey, G., Kondo, Y., Nielsen, J. E., Pan, X., & Wisthaler, A. (2013). Source attributions of pollution to the Western Arctic during the NASA ARCTAS field campaign. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(9), 4707-4721.
  3. Butchard, V., Randles, C. A., Silva, A. M., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P. R., Govindaraju, R., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Beyersdoref, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., & Yu, H. (2017). The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part II: Evaluation and case studies Journal of climate, 30(17), 6851-6872.
  4. Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Hales, J. M., Cess, R. D., Coakley, J. A., Hansen, J. E., & Hofmann, D. J. (1992). Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. Science, 255(5043), 423-430. doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5043.423
  5. Colarco, P., Silva, A., Chin, M., & Diehl, T. (2010). Online simulations of global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS-4 model and comparisons to satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D14), 1-25. doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012820
  6. Darmenov, A. S., & Silva, A. M. (2015). The Quick-Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED): Documentation of versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4. Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, 38, 201 (NASA/TM–2015–104606).
  7. Manning, M., & Solomon, S. (2007). The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing, in Climate Change 2007. (pp. 129-234)
  8. Freeborn, P. H., Wooster, M. J., Roy, D. P., & Cochrane, M. A. (2014). Quantification of MODIS fire radiative power (FRP) measurement uncertainty for use in satellite-based active fire characterization and biomass burning estimation. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(6), 1988-1994.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Fotogrametri ve Uzaktan Algılama

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

19 Aralık 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

26 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Ağustos 2024

Kabul Tarihi

20 Kasım 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Uyar, N. (2024). Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Science and Engineering, 6(2), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.55979/tjse.1534679
AMA
1.Uyar N. Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye. TJSE. 2024;6(2):114-120. doi:10.55979/tjse.1534679
Chicago
Uyar, Nehir. 2024. “Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye”. Turkish Journal of Science and Engineering 6 (2): 114-20. https://doi.org/10.55979/tjse.1534679.
EndNote
Uyar N (01 Aralık 2024) Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Science and Engineering 6 2 114–120.
IEEE
[1]N. Uyar, “Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye”, TJSE, c. 6, sy 2, ss. 114–120, Ara. 2024, doi: 10.55979/tjse.1534679.
ISNAD
Uyar, Nehir. “Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye”. Turkish Journal of Science and Engineering 6/2 (01 Aralık 2024): 114-120. https://doi.org/10.55979/tjse.1534679.
JAMA
1.Uyar N. Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye. TJSE. 2024;6:114–120.
MLA
Uyar, Nehir. “Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye”. Turkish Journal of Science and Engineering, c. 6, sy 2, Aralık 2024, ss. 114-20, doi:10.55979/tjse.1534679.
Vancouver
1.Nehir Uyar. Satellite Observations of Air Quality Dynamics in Türkiye. TJSE. 01 Aralık 2024;6(2):114-20. doi:10.55979/tjse.1534679

Cited By