STUDY ON THE MEDIATION EFFECT OF BODY IMAGE BETWEEN SOMATIZATION and SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING LEVELS IN INDIVIDUALS

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between subjective well-being, body image, somatization and to reveal the mediating effect of body image. People become more at peace with their bodies as their subjective well-being increases. In addition, subjective well-being and the goodness of body image reduce somatic symptoms. The questionnaire consisting of body image, subjective well-being and somatization scales delivered to the volunteer participants. Accordingly, an online survey was conducted with 534 participants between March 2020 and June 2020. SPSS 24.00 package program was used for the analysis of the data obtained from the participants. Cronbach's Alpha coefficients of the scales were calculated in order to perform the reliability analysis of the scales. These values are (0.797), (0.925) and (0.808) for the subjective well-being scale, Body image and somatization scale, respectively, the reliability of the scales was high. Afterwards, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis and mediation effect studies were carried out (p<0.05). According to the results obtained, people with low somatization characteristics have a positive attitude towards life and are physically healthier. In addition, it was concluded that body image has a partial mediating effect on the relationship between somatization and subjective well-being. The decrease in somatic symptoms and the feeling of well-being of people have a negative relationship, and this relationship is supported by being at peace with their bodies and being happy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• somatization
• well-being
• body image

Kaynakça

1. Altınok, A., & Kara, A. (2017). Relationship between body image, psychological symptom level and interpersonal style: Alternative models. Dusunen Adam the Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 30, 170-180.
2. Aslan, D. (2004). Beden algısı ile ilgili sorunların yaratabileceği beslenme sorunları. STED, 13(9), 326-329.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
4. Busch, F. N. (2014). Clinical approaches to somatization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(5), 419-427.
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimleri İçin Veri Analizi El kitabı. Pegem Yayıncılık.
6. Cash, T. F. (2002). A “negative body image”: Evaluating epidemiological evidence. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 269–276). Guilford Press.
7. Chong, C. S., Tsunaka, M., & Chan, E. P. (2011). Effects of yoga on stress management in healthy adults: A systematic review. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 17(1), 32.
8. Cowen, V. S. (2010). Functional fitness improvements after a worksite-based yoga initiative. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 14(1), 50-54.

9. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415
10. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 63-73). Oxford University Press.
11. Dülgerler, Ş. (2000). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinde somatizasyon ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
12. Göcen, G. (2013). Psychological well-being and religious orientation in terms of positive psychology: A research about adults. Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 7, 97-130.
13. Güleç, C. (2003). Psikiyatri ve Psikoterapilerin ABC'si. HYB Yayıncılık.
14. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory (Rev. ed., 2nd printing). University of Minnesota Press.
15. Hovardaoğlu, S. (1993). Vücut algısı ölçeği. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi, 1(Ek sayı 2), 26-27.
16. Hudziak, J. J., Boffeli, T. J., Kreisman, J. J., & Battaglia, M. M. (1996). Clinical study of the relation of borderline personality disorder to Briquet's syndrome (hysteria), somatization disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and substance abuse disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry.
17. Lipowski, Z. J. (1988). Somatization: The concept and its clinical application. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(11), 1358–1368. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.145.11.1358
18. Karasar, N. (2021). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi Kavramlar İlkeler Yöntemler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
19. Katz, J., & Farrow, S. (2000). Discrepant self-views and young women’s sexual and emotional adjustment. Sex Roles, 42, 781-805.
20. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 58, 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
21. Negovan, V. (2010). Dimensions of students’ psychosocial well-being and their measurement: Validation of a students’ Psychosocial Well Being Inventory. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 85-104.
22. Özdoğan, F., & Tüzün, İ. (2007). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 639-650.
23. Tuzgöl Dost, M. (2005). Öznel iyi oluş ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(23), 103-110.
24. Uskun, E., & Şabaplı, A. (2013). Lise öğrencilerinin beden algıları ile yeme tutumları arasındaki ilişki. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 12(5), 519-528.