Toward a Sociology of Boredom: Temporality, Affect, and Micro-Vulnerabilities in Contemporary Life

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 19, 16 - 29, 15.12.2025

Alkan Üstün

https://doi.org/10.30520/tjsosci.1837602

https://izlik.org/JA58ZD85NT

Öz

This article develops a theoretical framework for examining boredom as a sociotemporal and affective phenomenon situated within the broader organization of modern life. Rather than treating boredom as an individual psychological state, the paper conceptualizes it as an outcome of disrupted temporal coordination, diminished affective orientation, and micro-level interactional tensions. Drawing on classical approaches to time and modernity as well as contemporary analyses of acceleration and attentional strain, the study argues that boredom emerges when institutional, technological, or social rhythms fail to align with embodied temporal experience. The article further incorporates insights from affect theory and micro-sociology to show how boredom materializes in moments of emotional labor fatigue, interactional breakdowns, and everyday temporal suspensions. Cultural reflections from the Turkish context illustrate how temporal melancholy and uneven urban rhythms shape distinctive forms of boredom. Methodologically, the paper proposes a set of exploratory tools, Affective Micro-Mapping, the Boredom Moment Scale (BMS-5), and the Temporal Vulnerability Map, to investigate boredom as a situational and spatialized experience. Based on this framework, four analytical propositions are introduced: rhythm–affect misalignment, the acceleration paradox, micro-vulnerability indicators, and temporal inequalities. The article concludes that boredom provides a useful diagnostic lens for understanding temporality, affective experience, and everyday vulnerability, and outlines directions for future empirical research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Boredom , temporality , affective sociology , social acceleration , sociology of time.

Etik Beyan

This study does not require ethical approval as it is a theoretical work with no human participants or data.

Destekleyen Kurum

This research received no external funding.

Teşekkür

There are no acknowledgments for this study.

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
• Adam, B. (2004). Time. Polity Press.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
• Crary, J. (2014). 24/7: Late capitalism and the ends of sleep. Verso.
• Elias, N. (1992). Time: An essay. Blackwell.
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.
• Han, B.-C. (2015). The burnout society (E. Butler, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
• Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (S. Elden & G. Moore, Trans.). Continuum.
• Pamuk, O. (2003). İstanbul: Hatıralar ve şehir. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity (J. Trejo-Mathys, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
• Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. W. W. Norton.
• Tanpınar, A. H. (2017). Beş şehir. Dergâh Yayınları.
• Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
• Wittmann, M. (2016). Felt time: The psychology of how we perceive time (E. Butler, Trans.). The MIT Press.
• Zerubavel, E. (1985). Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. University of California Press.