RedefiningthePurpose forPublicLibrariesunderPressure:ACriticalApproach Based on Input Drawn from External Theoretical Frameworks

Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2 1 Nisan 2013
Leif Kajberg
PDF İndir
EN TR

RedefiningthePurpose forPublicLibrariesunderPressure:ACriticalApproach Based on Input Drawn from External Theoretical Frameworks

Abstract

There is a wide variety of views on the public library's future. In addition, a large number of books and articles have appeared,which addressthe future existence of public librariesin the age of Google,social media and electronic books. To identify majorthemes and viewpoints a review was conducted ofselected published sources addressing the legitimacy of public libraries along with the effortsto rethink libraries' future roles and chief tasks. The analysis ofselected publicationsshowsthat there is a paucity of critical thinking about public libraries, their mission, priorities and external environment. A major focus of the study is the relevance and feasibility of “importing” a specific body of theory from outside the field of Library and Information Science to enrich theoretical discussions within public librarianship. Hence, the paper considers ideas generated from reading German philosopher Axel Honneth's seminal work entitled “Das Recht der Freiheit”. An initial discussion is conducted of Honneth's theoretical perspectives and how they can be related to theory building in public librarianship. In considering Honneth's conceptualisations of personal freedom, attention is particularly given to the public library's awareness of the growing democratic deficit in the neo-liberal society

Keywords

public libraries, purpose, future, transformation, critical theory, Axel Honneth

Kaynakça

  1. Aabo, S., Audunson, R.A. and Vârheim, A. (2010). How do public libraries function as meeting places? Library & Information Science Research, 32, (1), 16-26
  2. Bawden, D. and Robinson, L. (2013). Introduction to information science. Chicago: Neal-Schuman.
  3. Bibliotekene og fremtiden. (2011). Bok og Bibliotek, 78, (1), 17-32
  4. Budd, J.M. (2008). Self-Examination: The present and future of librarianship. Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited.
  5. Buschman, J. (2003). Dismantling the public sphere:situating and sustaining librarianship in the age of the New Public Philosophy. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited/Greenwood.
  6. Coffman, S. (2012). The decline and fall ofthe library empire. Searcher, 20, (3), 14-21, 43-47
  7. Dahlkild, N. (2011) Biblioteket i tid og rum: Arkitektur, indretning og formidling. Copenhagen: Danmarks Biblioteksforening.
  8. de la Pena McCook, K. and Phenix, K.J. (2011). The future ofpublic libraries in the twenty-first century: human rights and human Capabilities. K. de la Pena McCook, Introduction to public librarianship, 2nd ed. (pages 339-360). New York: Neal Schuman.
  9. Fiels, M.F. (2011). A library ”state ofthe state”: Trends, issues and myths. A. Woodsworth (Ed.). Librarianship in times of crisis (pages 3-17). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
  10. Gorman, M. (2005). Library values in a changing world. Norman Horrocks (Ed.). Perspectives, insights & priorities. 17 leaders speak freely oflibrarianship (pages 55-62). Lanham: Scarecrow.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kajberg, L. (2013). RedefiningthePurpose forPublicLibrariesunderPressure:ACriticalApproach Based on Input Drawn from External Theoretical Frameworks. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 27(2), 253-265. https://izlik.org/JA45GN53ZH