BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bibliometric Analysis of' Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi: An Analysis of Research Subjects and Institutional Collabration through Social Network Analysis

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 47 - 61, 01.01.2014

Öz

Research subjects and collaboration between universities are important knowledge fields about forms of knowledge networks structures in a scientific community and flow of knowledge traffic. The aims of this study revealed to tourism knowledge network structure and institutional collaboration and examined to the roles of research subjects and collaboration into tourism network structure based on published articles in Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi. The data was collected from refereed articles in AnatoliaTurizm Araştırmaları Dergisi between years of 1997-2010. Social Network Analysis is used to define network structure and to examine links between structures. For that purpose, UCINET and Netdraw programs were utilized. At the end of this study, tourism knowledge structure generally has centralstructure rather than interdisciplinary structure. Management, marketing, economy, education, accounting-finance, health andtransportation research subjects are to be linked with each other rather than other research subjects. In this research, institutional collaborations are determined in low degree.In addition important roles are determined of University of Dokuz Eylül, University of Gazi and University ofMersin at institutional collaboration and separation of knowledge to other universities

Kaynakça

  • Al, U., Sezen, U. ve Soydal, İ. (2012). Hacettepe Üniversitesi bilimsel yayınlarının sosyal ağ analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 53-71.
  • Al, U., Soydal, İ. ve Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik Özellikleri Açısından bilig’in Değerlendirilmesi. bilig,55, 1-20.
  • Baloğlu,S., veAssante, L. (1999). A content analysis of subject areas and research methods used in five hospitality management journals. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 23, 53-70.
  • Benckendorff,P.(2009). Themes and trend in Australian and New Zealand Touris Research: A social networkanalysis of citations in two leading journals (1994-2007). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16, 1-15.
  • Borgatti,S. ve Li, X. (2009). On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 5-22.
  • Bott, E. (1957). Family and social networks. London: Tavistock.
  • Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79- 101.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cantner, U. ve Graf, H. (2006). The network innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis.Research Policy, 35(4), 463-480.
  • Crawford-Welch, S., ve McCleary, K. (1992). An identification of the subject areas and research techniques usedin five hospitality-related journals. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 11,155­ 167.
  • Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P. ve Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25-48.
  • Çiçek, D. ve Kozak, N. (2012). Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi’nde yayımlanan hakem denetimli makalelerin bibliyometrik profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 26, 4, 734-756.
  • Doyle,S. (2007). The role of social networks in marketing. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management,15(1), 60-64.
  • Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
  • Geuna, A., Llerena, P., Matt, M., ve Savona, M. (2003). Collaboration between a research university and firms andother institutions, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/ spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp108/sewp108.pdf.
  • Gossart,C. ve Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2): 323-345.
  • Gürsakal, N. (2009). Sosyal ağ analizi Pajek,Ucinet ve Gmine uygulamalı. Bursa: Dora Yayınları.
  • Haenlein,M. (2011). A social network analysis of customer-level revenue distribution. Marketing Letters,22(1), 15-29.
  • Hall, C. M. (2011). Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality intourism. Tourism Management,32(1), 16-27.
  • Hu,C., ve Racherla, P. (2008). Visual representation of knowledge networks: A social network analysis of hospitality research domain. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 302-312.
  • Jafari,J. ve Aaser, D. (1988). Tourism as the subject of doctoral dissertations. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 407-429.
  • Kim,S. (1998) Content analysis: Annals of Tourism Research and Journal of Travel Research. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of Wisconsin-Stout.
  • Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1303­ 1319.
  • Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E. ve de la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers&Education, 41(4), 353-368.
  • Meyer-Arendt,K. J. ve Justice, C. (2002). Tourism as the subject ofNorth American doctoral dissertations, 1987-2000. Annals of Tourism Research, 29, 1171-1174.
  • Morlacchi, P., Wilkinson, I. F., Young, L. C. (2005). Social network of researchers in B2B marketing: A case studyof the IMP Group 1984-1999. Journal of Business to Business Marketing,12(1), 3-34.
  • Palmer, A. L. ve Montano, J. J. (2005). Tourism and statistic bibliometric study 1998-2002. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), 167-178.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25: 348-349. researchgate.netalanından, erişim tarihi: 30.01.2014
  • Samdahl, D.M.ve Kelly, J.J. (1999). Speaking only to ourselves? Citation analysis of Journal of Leisure Research and Leisure Sciences. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 171-180.
  • Schmidgall,R. ve Woods, R. H. (1997/1998). Rating the influence scholars have on their field: A citation analysis of hospitality management education 1989—1996. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 9(4), 74-79.
  • Schmidgall,R., Woods, R. H., ve Rutherford, D. G. (1996). Journal and periodical usefulness as rated by hospitality faculty members. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly,37(2), 47-55.
  • Scott, J. P. (2000). Socialnetwork analysis A handbook. (2. bs.). Sage Publications.
  • Sheldon, P. (1991). An authorship analysis of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 18, 473­ 484.
  • Shih, H-Y (2006). Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism. Tourism Management,27(5), 1029-1039.
  • Streeter, C. L. ve Gillespie, D. F. (1992). Social network analysis. D. F. Gillespie, C. Glisson (Yay. Haz.) Quantitative Methods in Social Work: State of the Art içinde (ss.201-222). Haworth Press, Inc.
  • Trochim, W. M.,Marcus, S. E., Masse, L. C., Moser, R. P. ve Weld, P. C. (2008). The evaluation of largeresearch ınitiatives: A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 8-28.
  • Wasserman, S. ve Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications.
  • Wixted, B. ve Holbrook, J. A. (2008). Conceptual issues in the evaluation of formal research networks. CPROSTReport: 2008-0R httpVAvww.sfii.ca/cprost-oMMocsAxixtedho^rooHM-l.pdf.
  • Worrell, J., Wasko, M. ve Johnston, A. (2011). Social network analysis in accounting ınformation systemsresearch, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2011 tarihinde http:// www.citeulike.org/article/9613163 adresinden erişildi.
  • Xiao,H., ve Smith, S. L. J. (2006). The making of tourism research insights from a social sciences journal. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(2), 490-507.
  • Ying, T., ve Xiao, H. (2011). Knowledge linkage: A social network analysis of tourism dissertation subjects. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 14, 1-28. 611

Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Analizi: Araştırma Konuları ve Kurumlar Arası İş Birliğinin Sosyal Ağ Analizi ile İncelenmesi

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 47 - 61, 01.01.2014

Öz

Araştırma konuları ve kurumlar arası iş birliği, bilimsel bir toplulukta bilgi ağ yapılarının biçimleri ve bilgi trafiğinin akışı hakkında önemli bilgiler veren alanlardır. Çalışmanın amacı, 1997 yılından itibaren hakemli olarak yayımlanan Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi özelinde turizm bilgi ağ yapısının ve kurumsal iş birliği yapısının ortaya çıkarılması, araştırma konularının ve kurumlar arası iş birliği ağ yapı içerisindeki rollerinin belirlenmesi ve bağlantıların incelenmesidir. Veriler Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi’nde 1997-2010 yılları arasında yayımlanan hakem denetimli makalelerden elde edilmiştir. Ağ yapıyı tanımlamak ve yapılar arasındaki bağlantıları incelemek amacıyla sosyal ağ analizi kullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla UCINET ve Netdraw programlarından yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, turizm bilgi ağının genelinin disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşımdan ziyade daha merkezi olma eğiliminde olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Yönetim, pazarlama, ekonomi, eğitim, muhasebe-finansman, sağlık ve ulaştırma konularının diğer araştırma konularına göre kendi aralarında birbirleriyle daha bağlantılı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Kurumsal iş birliği açısından ise üniversiteler arasındaki iş birliği oranının oldukça düşük düzeyde olduğu; belirlenen bu ağ yapı içerisinde Dokuz Eylül, Gazi ve Mersin Üniversitelerinin bilimsel bilginin üretiminde merkezi bir rol üstlendikleri ve bilginin diğer üniversitelere yayılmasında önemli rolleri olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Al, U., Sezen, U. ve Soydal, İ. (2012). Hacettepe Üniversitesi bilimsel yayınlarının sosyal ağ analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 53-71.
  • Al, U., Soydal, İ. ve Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik Özellikleri Açısından bilig’in Değerlendirilmesi. bilig,55, 1-20.
  • Baloğlu,S., veAssante, L. (1999). A content analysis of subject areas and research methods used in five hospitality management journals. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 23, 53-70.
  • Benckendorff,P.(2009). Themes and trend in Australian and New Zealand Touris Research: A social networkanalysis of citations in two leading journals (1994-2007). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16, 1-15.
  • Borgatti,S. ve Li, X. (2009). On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 5-22.
  • Bott, E. (1957). Family and social networks. London: Tavistock.
  • Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79- 101.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cantner, U. ve Graf, H. (2006). The network innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis.Research Policy, 35(4), 463-480.
  • Crawford-Welch, S., ve McCleary, K. (1992). An identification of the subject areas and research techniques usedin five hospitality-related journals. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 11,155­ 167.
  • Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P. ve Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25-48.
  • Çiçek, D. ve Kozak, N. (2012). Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi’nde yayımlanan hakem denetimli makalelerin bibliyometrik profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 26, 4, 734-756.
  • Doyle,S. (2007). The role of social networks in marketing. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management,15(1), 60-64.
  • Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
  • Geuna, A., Llerena, P., Matt, M., ve Savona, M. (2003). Collaboration between a research university and firms andother institutions, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/ spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp108/sewp108.pdf.
  • Gossart,C. ve Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2): 323-345.
  • Gürsakal, N. (2009). Sosyal ağ analizi Pajek,Ucinet ve Gmine uygulamalı. Bursa: Dora Yayınları.
  • Haenlein,M. (2011). A social network analysis of customer-level revenue distribution. Marketing Letters,22(1), 15-29.
  • Hall, C. M. (2011). Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality intourism. Tourism Management,32(1), 16-27.
  • Hu,C., ve Racherla, P. (2008). Visual representation of knowledge networks: A social network analysis of hospitality research domain. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 302-312.
  • Jafari,J. ve Aaser, D. (1988). Tourism as the subject of doctoral dissertations. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 407-429.
  • Kim,S. (1998) Content analysis: Annals of Tourism Research and Journal of Travel Research. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of Wisconsin-Stout.
  • Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1303­ 1319.
  • Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E. ve de la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers&Education, 41(4), 353-368.
  • Meyer-Arendt,K. J. ve Justice, C. (2002). Tourism as the subject ofNorth American doctoral dissertations, 1987-2000. Annals of Tourism Research, 29, 1171-1174.
  • Morlacchi, P., Wilkinson, I. F., Young, L. C. (2005). Social network of researchers in B2B marketing: A case studyof the IMP Group 1984-1999. Journal of Business to Business Marketing,12(1), 3-34.
  • Palmer, A. L. ve Montano, J. J. (2005). Tourism and statistic bibliometric study 1998-2002. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), 167-178.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25: 348-349. researchgate.netalanından, erişim tarihi: 30.01.2014
  • Samdahl, D.M.ve Kelly, J.J. (1999). Speaking only to ourselves? Citation analysis of Journal of Leisure Research and Leisure Sciences. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 171-180.
  • Schmidgall,R. ve Woods, R. H. (1997/1998). Rating the influence scholars have on their field: A citation analysis of hospitality management education 1989—1996. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 9(4), 74-79.
  • Schmidgall,R., Woods, R. H., ve Rutherford, D. G. (1996). Journal and periodical usefulness as rated by hospitality faculty members. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly,37(2), 47-55.
  • Scott, J. P. (2000). Socialnetwork analysis A handbook. (2. bs.). Sage Publications.
  • Sheldon, P. (1991). An authorship analysis of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 18, 473­ 484.
  • Shih, H-Y (2006). Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism. Tourism Management,27(5), 1029-1039.
  • Streeter, C. L. ve Gillespie, D. F. (1992). Social network analysis. D. F. Gillespie, C. Glisson (Yay. Haz.) Quantitative Methods in Social Work: State of the Art içinde (ss.201-222). Haworth Press, Inc.
  • Trochim, W. M.,Marcus, S. E., Masse, L. C., Moser, R. P. ve Weld, P. C. (2008). The evaluation of largeresearch ınitiatives: A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 8-28.
  • Wasserman, S. ve Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications.
  • Wixted, B. ve Holbrook, J. A. (2008). Conceptual issues in the evaluation of formal research networks. CPROSTReport: 2008-0R httpVAvww.sfii.ca/cprost-oMMocsAxixtedho^rooHM-l.pdf.
  • Worrell, J., Wasko, M. ve Johnston, A. (2011). Social network analysis in accounting ınformation systemsresearch, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2011 tarihinde http:// www.citeulike.org/article/9613163 adresinden erişildi.
  • Xiao,H., ve Smith, S. L. J. (2006). The making of tourism research insights from a social sciences journal. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(2), 490-507.
  • Ying, T., ve Xiao, H. (2011). Knowledge linkage: A social network analysis of tourism dissertation subjects. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 14, 1-28. 611
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Deniz Karagöz

Nazmi Kozak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Karagöz, D., & Kozak, N. (2014). Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Analizi: Araştırma Konuları ve Kurumlar Arası İş Birliğinin Sosyal Ağ Analizi ile İncelenmesi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(1), 47-61.

Bu dergi içeriği CC BY 4.0cc.svg?ref=chooser-v1by.svg?ref=chooser-v1 ile lisanslanmaktadır.