Caulfield, M. ve Wineburg, S. (2023). Doğrulandı: Doğru Düşünme, Daha Az Kandırılma ve İnternette Neye İnanacağınıza Dair Daha İyi Kararlar Verme Yolları.

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 4, 299 - 307

Özden Demircioğlu Faydalıgül

https://doi.org/10.24146/tk.1555191

Öz

Bu çalışma Michael Caulfield ve Sam Wineburg tarafından yazılan “Verified: How To Think Straight, Get Duped Less, And Make Better Decisions About What To Believe Online” adlı kitabın incelemesini amaçlamaktadır. Yazarlar, bilgi okuryazarlığının önemini vurgularken, insanların internette hangi bilgilere güveneceklerini daha doğru şekilde belirlemelerine yardımcı olmak amacıyla dijital okuryazarlık becerilerini geliştirmek için detaylı adımlar sunmaktadır. Bu nedenle kitap, özellikle gençler için günümüz post-truth çağında internette yer alan bilgileri değerlendirmede rehber niteliği taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilgi okuryazarlığı, Dijital okuryazarlık, Bilgi Bozuklukları, SIFT, Yanal okuma

Caulfield, M. ve Wineburg, S. (2023). Verified: How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online. The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226829845 (ebook)

Öz

This review focuses on the book “Verified: How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online” by Michael Caulfield and Sam Wineburg. The authors emphasize the importance of information literacy, offering detailed steps to help individuals enhance their digital literacy skills and more accurately assess which information to trust online. As such, the book serves as a crucial guide, particularly for young people, in navigating and evaluating the vast amounts of information available on the internet in today's post-truth era.

Kaynakça

• Blechinger, J. (2024). Review of verified: how to think straight, get duped less, and make better decisions about what to believe online. Journal of Radical Librarianship, 10, 8-11.
• Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Connors, P., Otega, T., Kerr, D. ve Wineburg, S. (2021). Lateral reading: College students learns to criically evaluate internet sources in an online course. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review,2 (1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-56
• Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Ziv, N. ve Wineburg, S. (2022). Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(7), 963–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2022.2082783
• Caulfield, M. (2019, Mayıs 12). Introducing SIFT, a Four Moves Acronym. Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2019/05/12/sift-and-a-check-please-preview/
• Caulfield, M. ve Wineburg, S. (2023). Verified: How to think straight, get duped less and make better decisions about what to believe online. The University of Chicago Press.
• Eroğlu, Ş. ve Çakmak, T. (2020). Post-truth dönemini anlamak: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü öğrencilerinin yeni medya araçları kapsamında bilgi bozuklukları ve doğrulama algılarının değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 39, 307-326. doi: 10.30794/pausbed.682120
• Fielding, J. A. (2019). Rethinking CRAAP: Getting students thinking like fact-checkers in evaluating web sources. College and Research Libraries News,80 (11), 620-626.
• Simon, H. (1971). Designing organizations for an information rich world. In Computers, Communications And The Public Iinterest içinde (Ed. Martin Greenberger). John Hopskins Press, Baltimore.
• The University of Chicago Press. (2024a, Eylül 9). Michael Caulfield https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/C/M/au156119703.html
• The University of Chicago Press. (2024b, Eylül 9). Sam Wineburg https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/W/S/au23022139.html
• Wikipedia (2022a, Mart 26). Research Help: Should I Cite Wikipedia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Research_help#CiteWiki
• Wikipedia (2022b, Aralık 5). Wikipedia Is Not a Reliable Source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source
• Wineburg, S. ve Mcgrew, S.(2017). Lateral Reading: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information. Stanford History Education Group Working Paper No. 2017 A1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048994
• Wineburg, S. ve McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102
• Wineburg, S., Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M. D. ve Ortega, T. (2022). Lateral reading on the open Internet: A district-wide field study in high school government classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 893-909. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000740