SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION?

Sayı: 13 23 Aralık 2005
  • Zeynep Sabuncu
PDF İndir
TR EN

SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION?

Öz

This article is an attempt to define the relationship between two mathnawis written in different centuries, possessing unusual and intriguing similarities in terms of subject and expression. In the first part of the article, the term “nazire” imitatio is discussed. Old Turkish literature which is based on common themes, motifs and figures of speech, uses the term “nazire” in a general way, to describe the semblances between literary works. Ancient poets’ and today’s critics’ views on and definitions of this term are thoroughly examined. In this respect, other terms with parallel meanings are also studied. In the second part, two mathnawis namely, Mustafa Ali of Gallipoli’s Mihr ü Mah and Feyzi Çelebi’s Şem ü Pervane are compared and the observed similarities of theme, motif, composition and expression are evaluated with reference to the “nazire” characteristics discussed in the first part of the article.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Zeynep Sabuncu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

23 Aralık 2005

Gönderilme Tarihi

-

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2005 Sayı: 13

Kaynak Göster

APA
Sabuncu, Z. (2005). SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION? Türk Kültürü İncelemeleri Dergisi, 13, 129-166. https://izlik.org/JA86PJ76NU
AMA
1.Sabuncu Z. SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION? TKİD. 2005;(13):129-166. https://izlik.org/JA86PJ76NU
Chicago
Sabuncu, Zeynep. 2005. “SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION?”. Türk Kültürü İncelemeleri Dergisi, sy 13: 129-66. https://izlik.org/JA86PJ76NU.
EndNote
Sabuncu Z (01 Aralık 2005) SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION? Türk Kültürü İncelemeleri Dergisi 13 129–166.
IEEE
[1]Z. Sabuncu, “SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION?”, TKİD, sy 13, ss. 129–166, Ara. 2005, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA86PJ76NU
ISNAD
Sabuncu, Zeynep. “SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION?”. Türk Kültürü İncelemeleri Dergisi. 13 (01 Aralık 2005): 129-166. https://izlik.org/JA86PJ76NU.
JAMA
1.Sabuncu Z. SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION? TKİD. 2005;:129–166.
MLA
Sabuncu, Zeynep. “SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION?”. Türk Kültürü İncelemeleri Dergisi, sy 13, Aralık 2005, ss. 129-66, https://izlik.org/JA86PJ76NU.
Vancouver
1.Zeynep Sabuncu. SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MUSTAFA ALÎ OF GALLIPOLI’S MİHR U MAH AND FEYZİ ÇELEBİ’S ŞEM Ü PERVANE: PLAGIARISM OR TRADITION? TKİD [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2005;(13):129-66. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA86PJ76NU