Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Examining The Professional Belonging of Midwives and Their Perspective on The Profession: Mixed Method Research

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 231 - 248, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.52369/togusagbilderg.1533476

Öz

Abstract
Introduction: This research was conducted to examine midwives' perceptions of their professional competence, their professional affiliation and their perspectives on the profession.
Methods: It is a simultaneous mixed method research. The sample group of 143 midwives filled in the quantitative questionnaire, among which 103 midwives filled in the semi-structured questionnaire. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected simultaneously. For the quantitative part of the research, “Participant Information Form”, “Midwifery Belonging Scale” and “Perception Scale Regarding the Competences of the Profession” in order to determine the socio-demographic and professional characteristics of midwives.
Results: The relationship between the Midwifery Belonging Scale mean score and sub-dimensions and the Perception Scale for the Competences of the Midwifery Profession mean score and sub-dimensions was found to be statistically positively and highly significant
Discussion: Perception of midwives' professional belonging and authority, association membership, professional love, working in other fields, continuous care of a pregnant woman at birth, wanting to have a home birth as a midwife, being satisfied with her profession and being a midwife again, working in other fields, health at birth The role of the team and the job description affect clarity

Kaynakça

  • International Confederation of Midwives Midwifery: An Autonomous Profession 2017. Erişim Tarihi:11. 04.2022 Erişim Adresi: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/statement-files/2018/04/midwifery-an-autonomous-profession.pdf
  • Yarıcı F, Avcıbay Vurgeç B. The Relationship of Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Professional Belonging Levels of Student Midwives. Cyprus J Med Sci 2022;7(2):234-240.
  • Sharma B, Hildingsson I, Johansson E, Prakasamma M, Ramani KV & Christensson K. Do the pre-service education programmes for midwives in India prepare confident ‘registered midwives’? A survey from India. Global Health Action, 2015;8.1: 29553.
  • Nicacio MC, dos Santos Heringer AL, Schroeter MS, & de Figueiredo Pereira AL. Perception of nurse midwives regarding their professional identity: a descriptive study. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 2016;15(2): 205-214.
  • Mivšek, P A, Hundley V, van Teijlingen E, Pahor M, Hlebec V. (). Slovenian midwifery professionalization: Perception of midwives and related health rofessions. European Journal of Midwifery, 2021:5;1-10.
  • The International Confederation of Midwives (ICM). 2022 Erişim Tarihi:11. 04.2022 Erişim Adresi: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/our-work/policy-and-practice/icm-definitions.html
  • Norman M, & Hyland T. The role of confidence in lifelong learning. Educational Studies, 2003;29(2-3): 261-272.
  • Fenta ET, Temesgan WZ, & Asaye MM. Factors influencing midwives’ professional belongingness in northwest Ethiopia: Multicenter study. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 2023;20:101232.
  • Baskaya Y, Sayıner FD & Filiz Z. How much do I belong to my profession? A scale development study: Midwifery Belonging Scale. Health Care for Women International, 2020;41(8): 883-898.
  • Bilgiç FŞ. Examining the Occupational Belongings of Midwives: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Izmir Katip Celebi University Faculty of Health Sciences, 2022;7(1): 69-75.
  • Öztürk H, Babacan E, Anahar EÖ. Occupational safety of healthcare personnel working in the hospital. Gumushane University Health Science Journal, 2012;1(4): 252- 68
  • Yalnız H & Karaca Saydam B. The effect of job stress on job satisfaction in midwives. Balikesir Journal of Health Sciences, 2015:4 (1):16-23.
  • Sunar L, Kaya Y, Otrar M, Nerse S, Demiral S & Kalpaklıoğlu B. Working life and reputation of professions in Turkey. Istanbul University Faculty of Letters, 2015;12.
  • Keskin R & Pakdemirli MN. Professional Belonging Scale: A scale development, validity and reliability study, The Journal of International Social Research, 2016;9(43).
  • Aktürk SO, Kızılkaya T, Çelik M, Yılmaz T. Professional belonging levels of senior midwifery students and influencing factors: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences, 2021;4:23-33.
  • Akça E, Gökyıldız Sürücü Ş, Akbaş M & Şenoğlu A. The relationship between the social intelligence levels of midwifery students and their profession perceptions. Cukurova Medical Journal, 2019;44: 621-631.
  • Kuzgun Y. Professional development and consultancy 85nd ed. Ankara, Nobel Academic Publishing, 2017.
  • Ay F, Keçe M, İnci İ, Alkan N & Acar G. Midwifery students' perceptions of their profession and factors affecting their career plans. Balikesir Journal of Health Sciences, 2018;7(2):74-82.
  • Taşkın Yılmaz F, Tiryaki Şen H, & Demirkaya F. Nurses' and Midwives' Perceptions of Their Professions and Their Future Expectations, Health and Nursing Management Journal, 2014; 3(1):130-139.
  • Matthews A, Scott PA, Gallagher P, Corbally M. An exploratory study of the conditions important in facilitating the empowerment of midwives. Midwifery, 2006;22:181–191.
  • Murat Öztürk D, Sayıner FD, & Bayar A. Turkish adaptation of the perception scale about the competencies of the midwifery profession: Validity and reliability study. Gumushane University Journal of Health Sciences, 2018;7(1):28-34.
  • Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılış Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş & Demirel F. Scientific research methods in education, (26nd ed.). Ankara, Pegem Akademi, 2019.
  • International Confederation of Midwives. Essential Competencies for Midwifery Practice: 2019 Erişim Tarihi:11.06.2021 Erişim Adresi: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2019/10/icmcompetencies-en-print-october-2019_final_18-oct-5db05248843e8.pdf.
  • World Health Organization. Midwives voices, midwives realities. Findings from a global consultation on providing quality midwifery care. 2016. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250376/9789241510547-eng.pdf
  • Jefford E, Jomeen J, Wallin M. Midwifery abdication - is it acknowledged or discussed within the midwifery literature: An integrative review. Eur J Midwifery, 2018; 2:6.
  • Güner S, Yurdakul M & Yetim N. A Qualitative Study Reflecting the Academic Perspective on the Problems of the Midwifery Profession in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2015; (1): 80-87.
  • Koçak YÇ, Can HÖ, Yücel U, Akyüz MD & Turfan EÇ. Academic and physical profile of midwifery departments in Turkey. Journal of Health Sciences and Professions, 2017; 4(2), 88-92.
  • Bogren M, Ndela B, Toko C & Berg M. Midwifery education, regulation and association in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – current state and challenges, Global Health Action, 2020;13:1:1717409.
  • Sheehy A, Smith RM, Gray JE & Homer CS. Midwifery pre-registration education and mid-career workforce participation and experiences. Women and Birth, 2019;32(2).
  • Sevinç İ & Şahin A. Organizational commitment of public employees: A comparative study, Finance Journal, 2012;162:266-281
  • Bharj KK, Luyben A, Avery MD, Johnson PG, Barger MK & Bick D. An agenda for midwifery education: Advancing the state of the world׳ s midwifery. Midwifery, 2016:33:3-6.

Ebelerin mesleki aidiyeti ve mesleğe bakış açısının incelenmesi: Karma çalışma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 231 - 248, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.52369/togusagbilderg.1533476

Öz

Özet
Giriş: Bu araştırma, ebelerin mesleki yeterlikleri hakkındaki algılarını, mesleki aidiyetleri ve mesleğe bakış açılarını incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Yöntem: Araştırma, eş zamanlı karma yöntemle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklem grubunu oluşturan 143 ebe, nicel anketi doldurmuş olup, bu ebelerden 103'ü yarı yapılandırılmış anketi doldurmuştur. Nicel ve nitel veriler eş zamanlı olarak toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel kısmı için ebelerin sosyo-demografik ve mesleki özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla “Katılımcı Bilgi Formu”, “Ebelik Aidiyet Ölçeği” ve “Mesleğin Yeterliklerine İlişkin Algı Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Ebelik Aidiyet Ölçeği toplam puanı ile alt boyutları ve Ebelik Mesleğinin Yeterliklerine İlişkin Algı Ölçeği toplam puanı ile alt boyutları arasındaki ilişki istatistiksel olarak pozitif ve yüksek derecede anlamlı bulunmuştur.
Tartışma: Ebelerin mesleki aidiyet ve otorite algısı, dernek üyeliği, meslek sevgisi, başka alanlarda çalışma, doğumda bir gebe kadına sürekli bakım verme, ebe olarak evde doğum yapmak isteme, mesleğinden memnun olma ve tekrar ebe olma, başka alanlarda çalışma, doğumdaki sağlık ekibinin rolü ve iş tanımının netliği gibi faktörler etkili bulunmaktadır.

Etik Beyan

Etik değerlendirme Çalışma etik onayını aldı. Çalışmanın başında katılımcılardan bilgilendirilmiş onam formunu okumaları ve çevrimiçi formun başına çalışmaya katılmayı kabul edip etmediklerini soran bir soru ekleyerek katılıma onay vermeleri istendi. Katılmayı kabul eden katılımcılar çalışmaya dahil edildi.

Destekleyen Kurum

Herhangi bir destekleyen kuruluş yokrur.

Teşekkür

Bütün katılımcılara teşekkür ederiz.

Kaynakça

  • International Confederation of Midwives Midwifery: An Autonomous Profession 2017. Erişim Tarihi:11. 04.2022 Erişim Adresi: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/statement-files/2018/04/midwifery-an-autonomous-profession.pdf
  • Yarıcı F, Avcıbay Vurgeç B. The Relationship of Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Professional Belonging Levels of Student Midwives. Cyprus J Med Sci 2022;7(2):234-240.
  • Sharma B, Hildingsson I, Johansson E, Prakasamma M, Ramani KV & Christensson K. Do the pre-service education programmes for midwives in India prepare confident ‘registered midwives’? A survey from India. Global Health Action, 2015;8.1: 29553.
  • Nicacio MC, dos Santos Heringer AL, Schroeter MS, & de Figueiredo Pereira AL. Perception of nurse midwives regarding their professional identity: a descriptive study. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 2016;15(2): 205-214.
  • Mivšek, P A, Hundley V, van Teijlingen E, Pahor M, Hlebec V. (). Slovenian midwifery professionalization: Perception of midwives and related health rofessions. European Journal of Midwifery, 2021:5;1-10.
  • The International Confederation of Midwives (ICM). 2022 Erişim Tarihi:11. 04.2022 Erişim Adresi: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/our-work/policy-and-practice/icm-definitions.html
  • Norman M, & Hyland T. The role of confidence in lifelong learning. Educational Studies, 2003;29(2-3): 261-272.
  • Fenta ET, Temesgan WZ, & Asaye MM. Factors influencing midwives’ professional belongingness in northwest Ethiopia: Multicenter study. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 2023;20:101232.
  • Baskaya Y, Sayıner FD & Filiz Z. How much do I belong to my profession? A scale development study: Midwifery Belonging Scale. Health Care for Women International, 2020;41(8): 883-898.
  • Bilgiç FŞ. Examining the Occupational Belongings of Midwives: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Izmir Katip Celebi University Faculty of Health Sciences, 2022;7(1): 69-75.
  • Öztürk H, Babacan E, Anahar EÖ. Occupational safety of healthcare personnel working in the hospital. Gumushane University Health Science Journal, 2012;1(4): 252- 68
  • Yalnız H & Karaca Saydam B. The effect of job stress on job satisfaction in midwives. Balikesir Journal of Health Sciences, 2015:4 (1):16-23.
  • Sunar L, Kaya Y, Otrar M, Nerse S, Demiral S & Kalpaklıoğlu B. Working life and reputation of professions in Turkey. Istanbul University Faculty of Letters, 2015;12.
  • Keskin R & Pakdemirli MN. Professional Belonging Scale: A scale development, validity and reliability study, The Journal of International Social Research, 2016;9(43).
  • Aktürk SO, Kızılkaya T, Çelik M, Yılmaz T. Professional belonging levels of senior midwifery students and influencing factors: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences, 2021;4:23-33.
  • Akça E, Gökyıldız Sürücü Ş, Akbaş M & Şenoğlu A. The relationship between the social intelligence levels of midwifery students and their profession perceptions. Cukurova Medical Journal, 2019;44: 621-631.
  • Kuzgun Y. Professional development and consultancy 85nd ed. Ankara, Nobel Academic Publishing, 2017.
  • Ay F, Keçe M, İnci İ, Alkan N & Acar G. Midwifery students' perceptions of their profession and factors affecting their career plans. Balikesir Journal of Health Sciences, 2018;7(2):74-82.
  • Taşkın Yılmaz F, Tiryaki Şen H, & Demirkaya F. Nurses' and Midwives' Perceptions of Their Professions and Their Future Expectations, Health and Nursing Management Journal, 2014; 3(1):130-139.
  • Matthews A, Scott PA, Gallagher P, Corbally M. An exploratory study of the conditions important in facilitating the empowerment of midwives. Midwifery, 2006;22:181–191.
  • Murat Öztürk D, Sayıner FD, & Bayar A. Turkish adaptation of the perception scale about the competencies of the midwifery profession: Validity and reliability study. Gumushane University Journal of Health Sciences, 2018;7(1):28-34.
  • Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılış Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş & Demirel F. Scientific research methods in education, (26nd ed.). Ankara, Pegem Akademi, 2019.
  • International Confederation of Midwives. Essential Competencies for Midwifery Practice: 2019 Erişim Tarihi:11.06.2021 Erişim Adresi: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2019/10/icmcompetencies-en-print-october-2019_final_18-oct-5db05248843e8.pdf.
  • World Health Organization. Midwives voices, midwives realities. Findings from a global consultation on providing quality midwifery care. 2016. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250376/9789241510547-eng.pdf
  • Jefford E, Jomeen J, Wallin M. Midwifery abdication - is it acknowledged or discussed within the midwifery literature: An integrative review. Eur J Midwifery, 2018; 2:6.
  • Güner S, Yurdakul M & Yetim N. A Qualitative Study Reflecting the Academic Perspective on the Problems of the Midwifery Profession in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2015; (1): 80-87.
  • Koçak YÇ, Can HÖ, Yücel U, Akyüz MD & Turfan EÇ. Academic and physical profile of midwifery departments in Turkey. Journal of Health Sciences and Professions, 2017; 4(2), 88-92.
  • Bogren M, Ndela B, Toko C & Berg M. Midwifery education, regulation and association in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – current state and challenges, Global Health Action, 2020;13:1:1717409.
  • Sheehy A, Smith RM, Gray JE & Homer CS. Midwifery pre-registration education and mid-career workforce participation and experiences. Women and Birth, 2019;32(2).
  • Sevinç İ & Şahin A. Organizational commitment of public employees: A comparative study, Finance Journal, 2012;162:266-281
  • Bharj KK, Luyben A, Avery MD, Johnson PG, Barger MK & Bick D. An agenda for midwifery education: Advancing the state of the world׳ s midwifery. Midwifery, 2016:33:3-6.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Bakım Modelleri ve Doğum Yeri, Klinik Ebelik, Ebelik (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Hacer Yalnız Dilcen 0000-0001-5911-7201

Duygu Murat Öztürk 0000-0001-7917-3606

F. Deniz Sayıner 0000-0001-9287-989X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi 21 Ağustos 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Yalnız Dilcen H, Öztürk DM, Sayıner FD. Examining The Professional Belonging of Midwives and Their Perspective on The Profession: Mixed Method Research. TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2025;5(3):231-48.