INTERNATIONAL MEDIA FRAMING OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI WAR
Öz
The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a complex and multifaceted issue that has persisted for decades. The violent incidents that erupted on October 7, 2023, have significant global repercussions. This study analyzes the framing employed in the headlines and subheadings regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict during the initial five days of the outbreak, as well as how these frames relate to the editorial policies of major newspapers. The research focuses on The New York Times, The Guardian, Hürriyet, and Taz, published in the USA, England, Turkey, and Germany, respectively. The analysis revealed that Hürriyet, representing Turkey, utilized frames that reinforced neutrality in the early days of the conflict. Conversely, The New York Times, The Guardian, and Taz predominantly employed frames that favored Israel in their coverage. Overall, we found that Hürriyet and the other sample newspapers did not present the news with complete impartiality and objectivity in accordance with journalistic principles.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Akıner, N., & Küngerü, A. (2016). Uluslararası medya söyleminde İsrail’in 2014 Gazze saldırısı: CNN ve Al Jazeera üzerinden karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, 3(1), 53-79.
- Amer, M. M. (2022). BBC and New York Times’ coverage of the May 2021 Israel onslaught on Gaza: A critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(5), 1-10. doi:10.5539/ijel.v12n5p1
- Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Jason Aronson Inc. New Jersey: Notvale. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2007). Studying the media, public opinion, and foreign policy in international crises: The United States and the Bosnian crisis, 1992–1995. Press/Politics, 12(4), 20–51. doi:10.1177/1081180X0730718
- Brants, K., & Neijens, P. (1998). The infotainment of politics. Political Communication, 15(2), 149-164. doi:10.1080/10584609809342363
- Cottle, S. (2009). Global Crisis Reporting: Journalism in the Global Age. Berkshire: Open University Press.
- Durfee, J. L. (2006). Social change and status quo framing effects on risk perception: An exploratory experiment. Science Communication, 27(4), 459-495. doi:10.1177/10755470052853
- Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of ınternational news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air ıncidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87-102. doi:10.1177/19401612083146
