Araştırma Makalesi

ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 1 Temmuz 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS

Öz

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools transform creative processes, especially their capacity to produce content quickly; they raise concerns about education, authenticity, and ethics. This study aimed to examine the views of academics working in Fine Arts Faculties in Turkey on the effects of AI technologies on art education and to reveal their approaches to these technologies. For this purpose, the data obtained from 55 academicians through semi-structured interviews were subjected to thematic analysis. The findings showed that AI applications are adopted more in fields such as Graphic Design and Animation, while these technologies are handled more distantly in departments such as Painting. Academics were found to have concerns about the ethical dimensions of AI use, especially plagiarism and intellectual property rights. Opinions emphasize that while AI has the potential to increase creativity and productivity, it requires careful integration to preserve traditional skills and the authenticity of art. Consequently, the future of AI technologies in education should be addressed with an updated curriculum on these technologies' ethical and educational issues.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, Fine Arts Education, Productive Artificial Intelligence.

Etik Beyan

İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulundan 08.08.2023 tarih ve 2023/10-02 sayılı karar ve 2023/74 sayılı protokol ile etik kurul onayı alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

  1. Chatterjee, A. (2022). Art in an age of artificial intelligence. Front. Psychol, 13:1024449, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024449
  2. Egemen Dericioğlu, A. (2024). Hak ihlali yapmış pozisyona düşebilirler. In A. D. Yapay zeka ve sanat: araç mı amaç mı? (pp. 254-263). Ütopya Yayınevi.
  3. Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Herman, L.M., Mahari, R., Frank, M.R., Groh, M., Schroeder, H., Smith, A., Akten, M., Fjeld, J., Farid, H., Leach, N., Pentland, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380, 1110 - 1111. doi: 10.1126/science.adh4451
  4. MuFan, K. (2023). Applications and challenges of artificial intelligence in the future of art education. Pacific International Journal, 6(3), 61-65. doi: 10.55014/pij.v6i3.405
  5. Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., & Savela, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004
  6. Özkan, M. (2024). Yapay zeka çağında etkili öğretim. Elma Yayınevi.
  7. Roddy, S. (2024). Yaratıcı makine- İnsan iş birliği. In M. Filimowicz (Ed.), Yapay zeka ve yaratıcı çalışmanın geleceği - Algoritmalar ve toplum (pp. 55-84). The Kitap.
  8. Sáez-Velasco, S., Alaguero-Rodríguez, M., Delgado-Benito, V., & Rodríguez-Cano. (2024). Analyzing the impact of generative AI in arts education: A cross-disciplinary perspective of educators and students in higher education. Informatics, 11(37), 1-14. doi: 10.3390/informatics11020037
  9. Say, C. (2018). 50 Soruda yapay zeka. Bilim ve Gelecek Kitaplığı.
  10. Spee, B. T. M., Leder, H., Mikuni, J., Scharnowski, F., Pelowski M. & Steyrl D. (2024). Using machine learning to predict judgments on Western visual art along content-representational and formal-perceptual attributes. PLoS ONE, 19(9), e0284567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Işır, Ö., & Tanyel Başar, Ç. (2025). ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 15(3), 662-675. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1671471
AMA
1.Işır Ö, Tanyel Başar Ç. ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS. TOJDAC. 2025;15(3):662-675. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1671471
Chicago
Işır, Öznur, ve Çiğdem Tanyel Başar. 2025. “ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15 (3): 662-75. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1671471.
EndNote
Işır Ö, Tanyel Başar Ç (01 Temmuz 2025) ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15 3 662–675.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Işır ve Ç. Tanyel Başar, “ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS”, TOJDAC, c. 15, sy 3, ss. 662–675, Tem. 2025, doi: 10.7456/tojdac.1671471.
ISNAD
Işır, Öznur - Tanyel Başar, Çiğdem. “ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15/3 (01 Temmuz 2025): 662-675. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1671471.
JAMA
1.Işır Ö, Tanyel Başar Ç. ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS. TOJDAC. 2025;15:662–675.
MLA
Işır, Öznur, ve Çiğdem Tanyel Başar. “ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, c. 15, sy 3, Temmuz 2025, ss. 662-75, doi:10.7456/tojdac.1671471.
Vancouver
1.Öznur Işır, Çiğdem Tanyel Başar. ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINE ARTS. TOJDAC. 01 Temmuz 2025;15(3):662-75. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1671471