Araştırma Makalesi

SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 1 Temmuz 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS

Öz

In the digital age, online reputation has become one of the most critical factors shaping public perception of organizations. Reputation is vital for maintaining trust-based relationships with stakeholders and ensuring long-term success. While positive content builds loyalty and enhances brand value, negative content can lead to crises, especially due to the rapid spread of information on social media platforms.This study aims to systematically evaluate the academic literature on online reputation management, identify research gaps, and contribute to the field. A total of 116 publications retrieved from the Web of Science database using the keyword online reputation management were analyzed through bibliometric methods using VOSviewer software.The findings, assessed through author citation, collaboration, and keyword analyses, reveal the main research clusters, conceptual linkages, and gaps in the literature. The study highlights limited interdisciplinary collaboration, insufficient integration of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, and a predominant focus on large-scale enterprises, while emphasizing the need for more inclusive and diversified approaches.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Online Reputation Management, Social Media, Reputation Management, Crisis Communication, bibliometrics.

Kaynakça

  1. Alfonso, G., & Suzanne, S. (2008). Crisis Communications Management on the Web: How Internet‐Based Technologies are Changing the Way Public Relations Professionals Handle Business Crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(3), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00543.x
  2. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  3. Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença Jr., D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(3), 392-395. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
  4. Aula, P. (2010). Social media, reputation risk and ambient publicity management. Strategy & Leadership, 38(6), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571011088069
  5. Başer, E. (2023). Bilimsel İletişim Bağlamında “Dijital Reklamcılık” Çalışmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 63, 71-87. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1227007
  6. Becker, K., & Lee, J. W. (2019). Organizational Usage of Social Media for Corporate Reputation Management. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(1), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2019.VOL6.NO1.231
  7. Berthon, P. R., Pitt, L. F., Plangger, K., & Shapiro, D. (2012). Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: Implications for international marketing strategy. Business Horizons, 55(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.01.007
  8. Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00109.x
  9. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
  10. Coombs, W. T. (2015). The value of communication during a crisis: Insights from strategic communication research. Business Horizons, 58(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.10.003

Kaynak Göster

APA
Akpınar, G. M. (2025). SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 15(3), 850-866. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1674078
AMA
1.Akpınar GM. SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS. TOJDAC. 2025;15(3):850-866. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1674078
Chicago
Akpınar, Güliz Müge. 2025. “SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15 (3): 850-66. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1674078.
EndNote
Akpınar GM (01 Temmuz 2025) SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15 3 850–866.
IEEE
[1]G. M. Akpınar, “SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS”, TOJDAC, c. 15, sy 3, ss. 850–866, Tem. 2025, doi: 10.7456/tojdac.1674078.
ISNAD
Akpınar, Güliz Müge. “SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15/3 (01 Temmuz 2025): 850-866. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1674078.
JAMA
1.Akpınar GM. SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS. TOJDAC. 2025;15:850–866.
MLA
Akpınar, Güliz Müge. “SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, c. 15, sy 3, Temmuz 2025, ss. 850-66, doi:10.7456/tojdac.1674078.
Vancouver
1.Güliz Müge Akpınar. SCHOLARLY LANDSCAPES OF ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT: CLUSTERS, TRENDS AND GAPS. TOJDAC. 01 Temmuz 2025;15(3):850-66. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1674078