DESIGNING FLEXIBLE AND MULTIFUNCTIONAL COLLECTIVE LIVING SPACES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF STUDENT PERCEPTIONS IN A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
Öz
This study examines the spatial perceptions and expectations of students regarding collective living spaces on the campus of Bingöl University in Turkey. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach that integrates quantitative survey data with qualitative open-ended responses, the research investigates the relationship between flexible and multifunctional spatial designs and user experience. Statistical analyses reveal that students prioritize spaces that can adapt to both individual study and social interaction. Significant differences in spatial preferences were identified based on variables such as academic disciplines, year of study, and the amount of time spent on campus. Students emphasized design criteria such as sustainability, digital integration, comfort, and cultural identity. Based on these findings, eight conceptual spatial scenarios were developed to guide campus planning. This research not only contributes to the literature on campus planning within a specific context but also offers applicable recommendations for inclusive and student-centered designs in alignment with contemporary architectural principles.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Collective living spaces, campus design, flexible space, multifunctionality, sustainability, user-centered design.
Kaynakça
- Anaukwu, CP, Chukwudi, CD, David, DC, et al. (2023). The Concept of Flexible Spaces in Architecture: The Case of a Multi-Purpose Auditorium. African Journal of Educational Management, Teaching and Entrepreneurship Studies 9: 101-109.
- Arafat, MY, Faggal, AA, Khodeir, L, et al. (2024). Harmonizing design and desire: Unveiling user-centered requirements for university buildings. Results in Engineering 22: 102181.
- Birdwell, T, Basdogan, M and Harris, T. (2024). Developing outdoor campus space for teaching and learning: a scoping review of the literature. Learning Environments Research: 1-17.
- Bordac, S and Rainwater, J. (2008). User-centered design in practice: the Brown University experience. Journal of Web Librarianship 2: 109-138.
- Cort, C, Cort, G and Williams, R. (2017). The challenge of making buildings flexible: How to create campuses that adapt to changing needs. Planning for Higher Education 45: 96-104.
- Coulson, J, Roberts, P and Taylor, I. (2014). University trends: Contemporary campus design: Routledge.
- Creswell, JW and Creswell, JD. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications.
- Çapak, E. (2019). Bingöl Üniversitesi öğretim elemanlarının ve öğrencilerinin rekreasyonel faaliyetlere katılımlarını engelleyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Bartin University (Turkey).
- Doğan, SŞ and Vural, H. (2021). Bingöl Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin rekreasyonel eğilim ve taleplerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 8: 154-164.
- Eigenbrodt, O. (2017). Learning Space and Campus Planning. Essay. In Exploring Informal Learning Space in the University. Routledge.
