Araştırma Makalesi

COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4 1 Ekim 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS

Öz

This study evaluates the performance of three widely-used text-to-image AI models—DALL-E, MidJourney, and Stable Diffusion—in generating interior design visuals. Five standardized prompts, covering essential design elements such as architectural features, style, furniture, lighting, textiles, accessories, and layout, were provided to each AI model. The resulting visuals were then assessed by 15 experienced professionals and academics with over 10 years of expertise in interior design. Using a detailed rating system, the study found that MidJourney consistently outperformed the others, excelling in categories like design style, textiles, and lighting. DALL-E proved effective in generating architectural features but struggled with finer details, particularly in textiles and lighting. Stable Diffusion lagged behind in overall performance, especially in categories like layout and furniture. The study highlights the importance of prompt specificity in shaping AI-generated visuals and suggests areas for future improvement in AI models, particularly in complex design tasks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

AI-generated interior visuals, Text-to-image AI models, Interior design evaluation, AI in design visualization, AI models comparison

Etik Beyan

Before commencing the experiment, which is the chosen research method, the Antalya Bilim University Natural and Applied Sciences Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee, in their decision dated September 12, 2024, and marked as 2024/05, unanimously agreed that the applicant bears the responsibility for the research's methodology and scope, in alignment with ethical, legal, and copyright considerations, making it ethically sound to carry out the study.

Kaynakça

  1. Albaghajati, Z. M., Bettaieb, D. M., & Malek, R. B. (2023). Exploring text-to-image application in architectural design: Insights and implications. Architecture, Structures and Construction, 3, 475–497.
  2. Bertani, F., Ponta, L., Raberto, M., Teglio, A., & Cincotti, S. (2021). The complexity of the intangible digital economy: An agent-based model. Journal of Business Research, 527-540.
  3. Betker, J., Goh, G., Jing, L., Brooks, T., Wang, J., Li, L., & Ramesh, A. (2023). Improving image generation with better captions. Computer Science, 2(3), 8.
  4. Bongomin, O., Gilibrays Ocen, G., Oyondi Nganyi, E., Musinguzi, A., & Omara, T. (2020). Exponential disruptive technologies and the required skills of industry 4.0. Journal of Engineering, 2020, 4280156.
  5. Brisco, R., Hay, L., & Dhami, S. (2023). Exploring the role of text-to-image AI in concept generation. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 1835–1844.
  6. Caan, S. (2011). Rethinking design and interiors: Human beings in the built environment. Hachette UK.
  7. Caires, C. S., Estadieu, G., & Olga Ng Ka Man, S. (2023). Design thinking methodology and text-to-image artificial intelligence: A case study in the context of furniture design education. In Perspectives on Design and Digital Communication IV: Research, Innovations and Best Practices (pp. 113–134). Springer.
  8. Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100005.
  9. Ching, F. D., & Binggeli, C. (2018). Interior design illustrated. John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Çelik, T. (2024). Generative design experiments with artificial intelligence: reinterpretation of shape grammar. Open House International, 49, 822–842.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kahraman, M. U., Şekerci, Y., & Kılıç, E. C. (2025). COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 15(4), 1365-1386. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1736051
AMA
1.Kahraman MU, Şekerci Y, Kılıç EC. COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS. TOJDAC. 2025;15(4):1365-1386. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1736051
Chicago
Kahraman, Mehmet Uğur, Yaren Şekerci, ve Enes Can Kılıç. 2025. “COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15 (4): 1365-86. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1736051.
EndNote
Kahraman MU, Şekerci Y, Kılıç EC (01 Ekim 2025) COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15 4 1365–1386.
IEEE
[1]M. U. Kahraman, Y. Şekerci, ve E. C. Kılıç, “COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS”, TOJDAC, c. 15, sy 4, ss. 1365–1386, Eki. 2025, doi: 10.7456/tojdac.1736051.
ISNAD
Kahraman, Mehmet Uğur - Şekerci, Yaren - Kılıç, Enes Can. “COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 15/4 (01 Ekim 2025): 1365-1386. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1736051.
JAMA
1.Kahraman MU, Şekerci Y, Kılıç EC. COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS. TOJDAC. 2025;15:1365–1386.
MLA
Kahraman, Mehmet Uğur, vd. “COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, c. 15, sy 4, Ekim 2025, ss. 1365-86, doi:10.7456/tojdac.1736051.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Uğur Kahraman, Yaren Şekerci, Enes Can Kılıç. COMPARISON OF AI-GENERATED CONCEPTUAL INTERIOR DESIGNS USING STANDARDIZED PROMPTS IN VARIOUS AI MODELS. TOJDAC. 01 Ekim 2025;15(4):1365-86. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1736051