İnceleme Makalesi

CREATIVE DESTRUCTION OR EXTRAORDINARY OPPORTUNITIES?: READING THE CITY AND ARCHITECTURE THROUGH LIBERLAND

Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 1 Ocak 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

CREATIVE DESTRUCTION OR EXTRAORDINARY OPPORTUNITIES?: READING THE CITY AND ARCHITECTURE THROUGH LIBERLAND

Abstract

The concept of the metaverse, once envisioned as a virtual space of experience, has gained renewed momentum following its global rebranding during the COVID-19 pandemic. As cities such as Santa Monica, Seoul, and Shanghai begin to integrate metaverse strategies into their urban agendas, the metaverse is increasingly positioned as a “second world” that may significantly alter the future of urban life, architecture, and planning. However, this shift has also provoked critical debate around issues of urban rights, particularly the right to the city. This study explores the socio-spatial and political dimensions of the metaverse through a qualitative analysis grounded in critical urban theory. Drawing on the concepts of democracy, participatory rights, and socio-spatial inequality, the research interrogates how the emergence of virtual urbanism challenges conventional understandings of citizenship, public space, and urban experience. The analysis centers on the case of Liberland, the first digitally constructed libertarian metaverse micronation designed by Zaha Hadid Architects, to assess how digital urban environments redefine notions of sovereignty, participation, and spatial justice. While the metaverse presents radical new possibilities for architectural/ urban design and governance, it also raises fundamental uncertainties regarding contextualization, public legitimacy, and integration into lived urban realities. The study argues that rethinking the right to the city in virtual contexts is essential for developing inclusive and equitable digital futures.

Keywords

metaverse , liberland , Right to the city , Architectural design , Urban planning , Virtual Planning

Kaynakça

  1. Andiloro, A. (2022). 'This must be the place': Understanding video game placeness through atmosphere and the refrain in Dark Souls. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 14(2), 207-223.
  2. Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2022). The Metaverse in 2040. Pew Research Center, Washington.
  3. Aurigi, A. (2022). Smart cities, metaverses, and the relevance of place. IET Smart Cities, 4(3), 157-159.
  4. Barns, S. (2019). Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Springer.
  5. Bibri, S., & Allam, Z. (2022). The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart cities: The ethics of the hyper-connectivity, datafication, algorithmization, and platformization of urban society. Computational Urban Science, 2(1), 22.
  6. Bucknell, A. (2023). Ways of Worlding: Building Alternative Futures in Multispace. Architectural Design, 93(6), 94-103.
  7. Caffio, G., & Unali, M. (2023). Towards an Atlas of Metaverse in Architecture: Timeline 1980-2023. img journal, 9, 128-141.
  8. Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2018). Being a 'citizen' in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1-13.
  9. Chen, S., Cheng Chu Chan, I., Xu, S., Law, R., & Zhang, M. (2023). Metaverse in tourism: drivers and hindrances from stakeholders' perspective. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing , 40(2), 169-184.
  10. Cugurullo, F. (2022). Social implications of autonomous vehicles: a focus on time. AI & Society, 37(2), 791-800.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kızıldere Gökyer, D., & Uğurlu, E. (2026). CREATIVE DESTRUCTION OR EXTRAORDINARY OPPORTUNITIES?: READING THE CITY AND ARCHITECTURE THROUGH LIBERLAND. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 16(1), 576-587. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1797915