THE COVERAGE OF EU-TURKEY REFUGEE DEAL IN TURKISH ONLINE PRESS

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 266 - 275, 01.04.2018

Nurhan Kavaklı

Öz

Turkey has played a significant role as a shelter for Syrian refugees whose number in the country has reached almost 3 million, the largest Syrian refugee population in the world. As a result of Turkey’s geographical and political position in Syrian migration issue and along with the in the face of the overwhelming flow of smuggled migrants and asylum seekers from Turkey to Greece, in 2016 Turkey and the EU signed the Refugee Deal which aims to stop irregular arrivals from Turkey to Greek islands by allowing Greece to return to Turkey those migrants. However, the deal has raised many concerns and questions from especially some Turkish and international institutions and rights groups. Among those questions are its fairness for migrants and asylum seekers, its legality, its ethics and its feasibility. In this context, taken into consideration that the news media has an impact on forming of public opinion so that on policy outcomes and implementation, this study aims to examine the coverage of the EU-Turkey Refugee Deal in the Turkish online press. More particularly, the study is concerned with the actors and the frames which are dominantly present in the news, in order to trace how the deal has taken on meaning in public debate. In order to achieve this purpose, this study examine the news about the deal that was posted on the websites of Hürriyet, Milliyet and Cumhuriyet between 20 March and 20 July 2016 by using both content analysis and frame analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

The EU-Turkey Refugee Deal, Turkish online press, political communication, Syrians refugees, international migration

Kaynakça

• Baum, M.A. and Potter, P.B.K. (2008). “The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis”, Annual Review Political Science: 11:39–65. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/mbaum/documents/BaumPotter_AnnualReview2008.pdf Accessed 10/03/2017. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication - TOJDAC ISSN: 2146-5193, April 2018 Volume 8 Issue 2, p. 266-275 Submit Date: 29.06.2017, Acceptance Date: 17.03.2018, DOI NO: 10.7456/10802100/009 Research Article - This article was checked by Turnitin Copyright © The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication 275 Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A. (2000). “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment”. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 26 (2000): 611-639. Bennett W.L, Lawrence R.G and Livingston S. (2006). “None Dare Call it Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal”. Journal of Communication, 56(3):467–85. Berry, M., Garcia-Blanco, I. and Moore, K. (2015). Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries. Report prepared for the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, http://www.unhcr.org/56bb369c9.pdf Accessed 25/03/2017. Brody, R.A. (1991). Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. Chalaby, J. (1998). The Invention of Journalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Ekinci M.U. (2016).Türkiye-AB Muafiyeti Süreci ve Geri Kabul Anlaşması Hakkında Temel Sorular ve Yanıtları, Ankara: TC Avrupa Birliği Bakanlığı, http://www.ab.gov.tr/49332.html Accessed: 12/02/2017. Gamson, W. A. & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). “Movements and media as Interacting Systems”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 28(5): 114 - 125. Gerhards, J. and Schafer, M.S. (2010). “Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany”. New Media and Society, 12(1): 143-160. Graber D.A. (2002). Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage. Hall, S. (1980). “Encoding/decoding”. In: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (Ed.): Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79 London: Hutchinson:128-38. lepo.it.da.ut.ee/~cect/teoreetilised%20seminarid_2010/...seminar/Hall,%20S.doc Accessed 20/02/2017. Holsti O.R. (2004). Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Jentleson B.W. (1992). “The Pretty Prudent Public—Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force”, International Studies Quarterly, 36(1):49–74. Kuypers J.A. (1997). Presidential Crisis Rhetoric and the Press in the Post-Cold War World. Westport, CT: Praeger. Nacos, B.L, Shapiro R.Y, and Isernia P. (2000). Decisionmaking in a Glass House. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Paletz, D.L. (2002). The Media in American Politics. New York: Longman Statham, P. and Trenz, H.J. (2013).The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge. Sirkeci, İ. (2017). “Turkey’s Refugees, Syrians and Refugees from Turkey: A Country of Insecurity”, Migration Letters, 14(1): 127-144. Zaller J. and Chiu D. (2000). “Government’s Little Helper: U.S. Press Coverage of Foreign Policy Crises, 1946–1999”. In: B.L. Nacos, R.Y. Shapiro and P. Isernia, (eds.) Decisionmaking in a Glass House, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.