Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR YAPIM İÇİN MİMARLIK EĞİTİMİNİN ROLÜ: TÜRKİYE BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR VAKA ANALİZİ

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 323 - 333, 01.01.2021

Öz

Günümüzde sürdürülebilirlik kavramı, endüstrinin her alanında olduğu gibi inşaat sektöründe de oldukça dikkat çekici bir konudur. Özellikle bina yaşam döngüsünün çevresel etkileri düşünüldüğünde sürdürülebilirlik kavramının inşaat sektörü için önemi daha iyi anlaşılmaktadır. Her eğitim alanında olduğu gibi mimarlık eğitimi de çağın gereksinimlerine göre şekillenmektedir. Çağın ihtiyaçları doğrultusunda değişen mimarlık alanına bakıldığı zaman yirmi yıl öncesi ile günümüzde bazı farklılıklar bulunmaktadır. Sürdürülebilirlik konusunda mimarlık, iç mimarlık, inşaat mühendisliği, şehir ve bölge planlaması ve peyzaj mimarlığı gibi disiplinlerin eğitim aşamalarında bazı değişikliklere gidilmesi gerekmektedir. Mesleki çevre duyarlılığının gelişim sürecinde, yaşam alanlarını biçimlendiren mimarlığa diğer disiplinlerle birlikte büyük sorumluluk düşmektedir. Mimarlık öğrencisinin özellikle lisans düzeyinde alacağı eğitimle ekoloji ve sürdürülebilirlik kavramlarını önemseyen, yenilebilir enerji kaynaklarını kullanabilen bir birikim oluşturması sağlanmalıdır. Bu çalışma; Balıkesir Üniversitesi Mimarlık bölümü lisans 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilirlik konusundaki farkındalıklarını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır ve çalışma için gerekli olan veriler bir anket çalışması yapılarak toplanmıştır. Anket çalışması; 2018-2019 ve 2019-2020 eğitim öğretim yılları bahar döneminde 4. sınıf öğrencilerine uygulanmıştır. Sürdürülebilirlik kavramına dikkat çekmeye çalışan bu çalışma, bina ölçeğinde uygulayıcı olacak mimar adaylarının, eğitim sürecinde sürdürülebilirlik kavramı ile ne kadar etkileşimde olduklarını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları; öğrencilerin sürdürülebilir mimarlık konusunda çok fazla bilgi sahibi olmadıklarını ancak bu dersleri almaya istekli olduklarını göstermektedir. Çalışmanın bir diğer sonucu da, öğrencilerin mimari tasarım derslerinde sürdürülebilirlik konusuna vurgu yapan projelere daha çok yönlendirilmesi gerekliliğidir.

Kaynakça

  • Allu E.L.A. (2014). Sustainability and architectural education in the University of Jos- Nigeria. Conference of the International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 07(02):99–106.
  • AlSanad S. (2015). Awareness, drivers, actions, and barriers of sustainable construction in Kuwait. Procedia Engineering, 118, 969– 983.
  • Arat Y., Uysal M. (2016). Ekoloji ve sürdürebilirlik kavramlarına ilişkin dersler açısından mimarlık eğitim programlarının irdelenmesi. Online Journal of Art and Design 4(2), 12-34.
  • Boarin P., Martinez-Molina A., Juan-Ferruses I. (2020). Understanding students’ perception of sustainability in architecture education: A comparison among universities in three different continents. J. Clean. Prod. 248.
  • Chang R, Zillante G, Zhao Z, Zuo J.(2015). Research on sustainability and construction firms: current status and future agenda. Proceedings, International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, Luleå, August, 310-317.
  • Chen B., Pitts A., Ward I. (2008). Sustainability related educational programmes for sustainable housing design. 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Cottrell M., Guide to the LEED AP, Interior Design and Construction (ID+C) Exam. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Canada, 2012.
  • de Paula N., Arditi D., Melhado S. (2017) Managing sustainability efforts in building design, construction, consulting, and facility management firms. Eng. Construct. Architect. Manag., 24 (6), 1040-1050.
  • El¬-Feki S., Kenawy I.(2018).Integrating sustainability within architectural education in Cairo. International Journal on: Proceedings of Science and Technology, 1-9.
  • Enshassi A., Mayer E. (2005). Barriers to the application of sustainable construction concepts in Palestine. In Proceedings of the 2005 World Sustainable Building Conference, 27–29 September, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Gürgün A. (2017) Türkiye’deki LEED NC 2009 sertifikalı binaların enerji ve atmosfer kredilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Politeknik Dergisi, 20(2), 383-392.
  • Iulo L.D., Gorby C., Poerschke U., Kalisperis L.N., Woollen M .(2013). Environmentally conscious design- educating future architects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 434-448.
  • Karaca Ü.B., Cetintas K.F. (2015). Examination of sustainable building design from the point of legislation view in Turkey and in the World. 2nd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium, 28 - 30th May, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kim, J.J., Rigdon, B.(1998). Sustainable Architecture Module: Introduction to Sustainable Design. National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, The University of Michigan, Michigan.
  • Koman İ., Eren Ö. (2006). Alternatif sürdürülebilir konut uygulamaları ve Türkiye’deki betonarme konut sektörü. Mimarlık,329, Mayıs-Haziran.
  • McLennan J.F. (2004). The Philosophy of Sustainable Design: The Future of Architecture. Ecotone LLC, Kansas City,
  • Serpell A., Kort J., Vera S. (2013). Awareness, actions, drivers and barriers of sustainable construction in Chile. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(2): 272–288.
  • Shafii F., Ali Z.A., Othman M.Z. (2006). Achieving sustainable construction in the developing countries of Southeast Asia. In Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, 5–6 September, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Shari Z., Jaafar F.Z. (2006). Integration and implementation of sustainability in Malaysian architectural education. In the 40th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association AN-ZAScA, 22-24 November, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Somalı B., Ilıcalı, E. (2009). Leed ve Breeam uluslararası yeşil bina değerlendirme sistemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. IX. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi, 1081-1088, 6-9 Mayıs, İzmir, Türkiye.
  • Stelmack A.K., Foster K., Hindman D. (2014). Sustainable Residentail Interiors. John Wiley & Sons.,Canada
  • Taleghani M., Ansari HR , Jennings P. (2011). Sustainability in architectural education: a comparison of Iran and Australia. Renewable Energy, 36(7), 2021-2025.
  • Tercan A. Scrutiny of the energy efficiency notion, in terms of connections between design and technology in architecture, Phd thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University,2000.
  • Topak F. , Tokdemir O.B. , Pekeriçli M.K. and Tanyer A.M. (2019). Sustainable construction in Turkish higher education context. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 2(1), 40-47.
  • United Nations. (1972). Report of the United Nations conference on the human environment. Sockholm, Sweden: United Nations.
  • UN WCED, W. C. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. UN World Commission on Environment and Development.
  • Urük Z.F., Külünkoğlu İ.A.K. (2019). Breeam, Leed ve DGNB yeşil bina sertifikasyon sistemlerinin standart bir konutta karşılaştırılması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi , (15) , 143-154.
  • US Department of Energy (2008). Building Energy Data Book, Section 1.1.1
  • Yüksek İ. (2013). The evaluation of architectural education in the scope of sustainable architecture. Proced. Soc. Behav. Sci., 89,496-508.
  • Zhang X., Shen L., Wu Y. (2011). Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2),157-167.

THE ROLE OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION: A CASE STUDY AT UNIVERSITY OF BALIKESIR IN TURKEY

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 323 - 333, 01.01.2021

Öz

Today, the concept of sustainability is a very popular topic in the construction sector, as in all areas of the industry. When the environmental impacts of the building life cycle are considered, the importance of this concept for the construction sector is seen more clearly. As in every education field, architectural education is also shaped according to the needs of the age. The differences between two decades and today can be noticed when looking at the field of architecture that shifts in line with the needs of the age. Thus, necessary changes should be made in some disciplines such as architecture, interior architecture, civil engineering, city and regional planning and landscape architecture under the subject of sustainability. Architecture, which shapes the living spaces, has an enormous responsibility along with some other disciplines during the evolution of the occupational environmental awareness. It should be ensured with the university education that the undergraduate architecture students develop a mentality that pays attention to the concepts of ecology and sustainability, and enables skills to utilize renewable energy sources. This study aims to determine the awareness of students on sustainability. The data for this research is collected by conducting a survey at the Department of Architecture at the University of Balikesir, and covers the senior students in the spring semester of 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 academic years. This study, which intends to accentuate the concept of sustainability, aims to determine how the architect candidates who will be implementers in the future, interact with the concept of sustainability during their higher education. One of the results of the study shows that students do not have much knowledge about sustainable architecture, but they tend to take related courses. Another result of the study is that students should be directed to projects that emphasize sustainability in architectural design courses.

Kaynakça

  • Allu E.L.A. (2014). Sustainability and architectural education in the University of Jos- Nigeria. Conference of the International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 07(02):99–106.
  • AlSanad S. (2015). Awareness, drivers, actions, and barriers of sustainable construction in Kuwait. Procedia Engineering, 118, 969– 983.
  • Arat Y., Uysal M. (2016). Ekoloji ve sürdürebilirlik kavramlarına ilişkin dersler açısından mimarlık eğitim programlarının irdelenmesi. Online Journal of Art and Design 4(2), 12-34.
  • Boarin P., Martinez-Molina A., Juan-Ferruses I. (2020). Understanding students’ perception of sustainability in architecture education: A comparison among universities in three different continents. J. Clean. Prod. 248.
  • Chang R, Zillante G, Zhao Z, Zuo J.(2015). Research on sustainability and construction firms: current status and future agenda. Proceedings, International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, Luleå, August, 310-317.
  • Chen B., Pitts A., Ward I. (2008). Sustainability related educational programmes for sustainable housing design. 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Cottrell M., Guide to the LEED AP, Interior Design and Construction (ID+C) Exam. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Canada, 2012.
  • de Paula N., Arditi D., Melhado S. (2017) Managing sustainability efforts in building design, construction, consulting, and facility management firms. Eng. Construct. Architect. Manag., 24 (6), 1040-1050.
  • El¬-Feki S., Kenawy I.(2018).Integrating sustainability within architectural education in Cairo. International Journal on: Proceedings of Science and Technology, 1-9.
  • Enshassi A., Mayer E. (2005). Barriers to the application of sustainable construction concepts in Palestine. In Proceedings of the 2005 World Sustainable Building Conference, 27–29 September, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Gürgün A. (2017) Türkiye’deki LEED NC 2009 sertifikalı binaların enerji ve atmosfer kredilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Politeknik Dergisi, 20(2), 383-392.
  • Iulo L.D., Gorby C., Poerschke U., Kalisperis L.N., Woollen M .(2013). Environmentally conscious design- educating future architects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 434-448.
  • Karaca Ü.B., Cetintas K.F. (2015). Examination of sustainable building design from the point of legislation view in Turkey and in the World. 2nd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium, 28 - 30th May, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kim, J.J., Rigdon, B.(1998). Sustainable Architecture Module: Introduction to Sustainable Design. National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, The University of Michigan, Michigan.
  • Koman İ., Eren Ö. (2006). Alternatif sürdürülebilir konut uygulamaları ve Türkiye’deki betonarme konut sektörü. Mimarlık,329, Mayıs-Haziran.
  • McLennan J.F. (2004). The Philosophy of Sustainable Design: The Future of Architecture. Ecotone LLC, Kansas City,
  • Serpell A., Kort J., Vera S. (2013). Awareness, actions, drivers and barriers of sustainable construction in Chile. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(2): 272–288.
  • Shafii F., Ali Z.A., Othman M.Z. (2006). Achieving sustainable construction in the developing countries of Southeast Asia. In Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, 5–6 September, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Shari Z., Jaafar F.Z. (2006). Integration and implementation of sustainability in Malaysian architectural education. In the 40th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association AN-ZAScA, 22-24 November, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Somalı B., Ilıcalı, E. (2009). Leed ve Breeam uluslararası yeşil bina değerlendirme sistemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. IX. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi, 1081-1088, 6-9 Mayıs, İzmir, Türkiye.
  • Stelmack A.K., Foster K., Hindman D. (2014). Sustainable Residentail Interiors. John Wiley & Sons.,Canada
  • Taleghani M., Ansari HR , Jennings P. (2011). Sustainability in architectural education: a comparison of Iran and Australia. Renewable Energy, 36(7), 2021-2025.
  • Tercan A. Scrutiny of the energy efficiency notion, in terms of connections between design and technology in architecture, Phd thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University,2000.
  • Topak F. , Tokdemir O.B. , Pekeriçli M.K. and Tanyer A.M. (2019). Sustainable construction in Turkish higher education context. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 2(1), 40-47.
  • United Nations. (1972). Report of the United Nations conference on the human environment. Sockholm, Sweden: United Nations.
  • UN WCED, W. C. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. UN World Commission on Environment and Development.
  • Urük Z.F., Külünkoğlu İ.A.K. (2019). Breeam, Leed ve DGNB yeşil bina sertifikasyon sistemlerinin standart bir konutta karşılaştırılması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi , (15) , 143-154.
  • US Department of Energy (2008). Building Energy Data Book, Section 1.1.1
  • Yüksek İ. (2013). The evaluation of architectural education in the scope of sustainable architecture. Proced. Soc. Behav. Sci., 89,496-508.
  • Zhang X., Shen L., Wu Y. (2011). Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2),157-167.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yeliz Tülübaş Gökuç 0000-0003-3594-7977

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Eylül 2020
Kabul Tarihi 27 Ekim 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Tülübaş Gökuç, Y. (2021). THE ROLE OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION: A CASE STUDY AT UNIVERSITY OF BALIKESIR IN TURKEY. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 11(1), 323-333.


All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)

by-nc.png