Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3 1 Mart 2011
  • Khaldoun Aldiabat
  • Carol-lynne Le Navenec
PDF İndir
EN

Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities

Öz

There is confusion among graduate students about how to select the qualitative methodology that best fits their research question. Often this confusion arises in regard to making a choice between a grounded theory methodology and an ethnographic methodology. This difficulty may stem from the fact that these students do not have a clear understanding of the principles upon which to select a particular methodology and / or have limited experience in conducting qualitative research. Addressed in this paper are three questions that will help students make an informed decision about the choice of method. The answers to these questions constitute key elements in the decision-making process about whether to use a grounded theory or an ethnographic methodology

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Khaldoun Aldiabat Bu kişi benim

Carol-lynne Le Navenec Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mart 2011

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Şubat 2015

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2011 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aldiabat, K., & Navenec, C.- lynne L. (2011). Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.04785
AMA
1.Aldiabat K, Navenec C lynne L. Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities. TOJQI. 2011;2(3):1-13. doi:10.17569/tojqi.04785
Chicago
Aldiabat, Khaldoun, ve Carol-lynne Le Navenec. 2011. “Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities”. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 2 (3): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.04785.
EndNote
Aldiabat K, Navenec C- lynne L (01 Temmuz 2011) Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 2 3 1–13.
IEEE
[1]K. Aldiabat ve C.- lynne L. Navenec, “Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities”, TOJQI, c. 2, sy 3, ss. 1–13, Tem. 2011, doi: 10.17569/tojqi.04785.
ISNAD
Aldiabat, Khaldoun - Navenec, Carol-lynne Le. “Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities”. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 2/3 (01 Temmuz 2011): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.04785.
JAMA
1.Aldiabat K, Navenec C- lynne L. Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities. TOJQI. 2011;2:1–13.
MLA
Aldiabat, Khaldoun, ve Carol-lynne Le Navenec. “Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities”. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, c. 2, sy 3, Temmuz 2011, ss. 1-13, doi:10.17569/tojqi.04785.
Vancouver
1.Khaldoun Aldiabat, Carol-lynne Le Navenec. Clarification of the Blurred Boundaries between Grounded Theory and Ethnography: Differences and Similarities. TOJQI. 01 Temmuz 2011;2(3):1-13. doi:10.17569/tojqi.04785