The Ethical Perceptions of Elementary School Teachers in the Triple Perspective of Classification of Ethics

Öz

The ethical classification that forms the basis for this research uses a triple classification slightly different from the traditional approaches: “Consistency”, “Results” and “Caring”. With this classification it is stated that in handling the actions with an ethical approach, all three aspects are necessary. This study was conducted as a qualitative research and interview method was used to collect the research data. Study group consists of 10 volunteer elementary school teachers. The findings of the study reveal that the teachers who took part in this research took into consideration each of the factors “consistency”, “results” and “caring” sometimes singly, sometimes two of them together or sometimes three of them together. In addition, it is possible to indicate that different factors come to the forefront in different incidents that have similar characteristics, indicating that in this sense there is not a simple or single ethical stance in operation. From an ethical point of view, our actions are also influenced by our society’s norms, from the principles that come into existence over time and from the roles that we assume in the social domain

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ethics
• consistency
• results
• caring
• teacher perception
• qualitative research

Kaynakça

1. Aijasaho, V.; Vaismaa,K.; Uusiautti, S., & Määttä,K. (2012). Classroom teachers’ perceptions of ethical educational work, Journal of Studies in Education, 2(4),1-14.
2. Aydın, İ. (2006). Eğitim ve öğretimde etik, Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
3. Badiou, A. (2006). Etik, (çev. Tuncay Birkan), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
4. Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
5. Bilington, R.(2011). Felsefeyi yaşamak, ahlak düşüncesine giriş, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
6. Özdemir, T., Y.; Boydak Özan, M.; & Yirci, R. (2013). Teachers and school administrators’ opinions regarding ethical leadership behaviors of provincial/district national educational office administrators, International Journal of Social Science,6(3), 509-527.
7. Clarken, R. H. (2009). Moral intelligence in the schools. School of Education, Northern Michigan University. 1-7.
8. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

9. Çiftçi, N. (2003). Kohlberg’in bilişsel ahlak gelişimi teorisi, ahlak ve demokrasi eğitimi. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi 1(1), 43-77.
10. Haynes, F. (2002). Eğitimde etik (Çev. S. K. Akbaş). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
11. Gammel, S.(2006) Ethics and morality, The Ethics Portfolio Technical University Darmstadt For Nanocap.
12. Gilman, S. C.(2005) Ethics codes and codes of conduct as tools for promoting an ethical and professional public service: Comparative successes and lessons, Washington DC: The World Bank.
13. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, B., Ernst, F.(2003). Explaining Altruistic Behavior in Humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 153-172.
14. İpbüker, C., Göksel, Ç., & Deniz, R.(2005) Mühendislik etiği (Ders Notu), İstanbul: İTÜ Yayınları.
15. Johnson, E. (2006). Ethical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press
16. Kanungo, R. N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,18(4), 257-265.
17. Kıranlı, S., & İlğan, A. (2007). Eğitim örgütlerinde karar verme sürecinde etik, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (14), 150- 162.
18. Kidder, R. (2005). Moral courage for a university ethics capstone class? New York: Harpercollins.
19. Kocabas, İ., & Karakose, T. (2009). Ethics in school administration, African Journal of Business Management, 3 (4), 126–130.
20. Langlois, L. (2004). Responding ethically: Complex decision-making by school district superintendents. International Studies in Educational Administration,32(2), 78-93.
21. Langlois, L. (2011). Anatomy of ethical leadership, Edmonton: AU Press.
22. Marshall, C., & Rossman G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage.
23. Lawrence Neuman, W. (2003). Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (5th ed.), New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
24. Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism, Ontario: Batoche Books.
25. Millett, S. (2002). Toward an ethical school. The Australian Higher Education Suppplement, 1-18 Retrieved on September 05, 2012 from http://wmich.edu/ethics/pubs/vol_xiv/ethical_school.pdf
26. Olen, J., & Berry, V. (1992), Applying ethics: A text with readings. (4th ed.). California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
27. Official Gazetta, Establishment of the board of ethics for public officials and the law on the
28. amendment of certain laws. Regulation, No 5176, 25 May 2004.
29. Özbek, O. (2003). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin mesleki etik ilkeleri ve bu ilkelere uyma düzeyleri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi.
30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3d ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Pieper, A. (1999). Etiğe giriş, Çev. Veysel Ataman, Gönül Sezer, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları
32. Rebore, R. W. (2001). The ethics of educational leadership (1st Ed.) Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
33. Sayımer, İ., (2006), Halkla ilişkiler etiğinde öne çıkan modellerin etik sistemler açısından değerlendirilmesi, Küresel İletişim Dergisi,2, 1-19.
34. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
35. Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2011). Teachers’ critical incidents: Ethical dilemmas in teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 648-656.
36. Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. (2005). Ethical leadership and decision-making in education: Applying theoretical perspective to complex dilemmas (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
37. Strike, K. A. (1995). Professional ethics and the education of professionals. Educational Horizons, 74(1), 29–36.
38. Starratt, R. J. (2004). Ethical leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
39. Stefkovich, J., Begley, P. T.(2007) Ethical School Leadership : Defining The Best Interests of Students, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(2).
40. Stich, S.; John, M.; Roedder, E.(2008). Altruism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Talınlı, İ. (2007). Çevre Mühendisliği Etiği Açısından Türkiyede Çevre Politikaları. 7th National Environmental Engineering Congress, 24-27 October 2007, İzmir.
42. Toprakçı, E; Bozpolat, E. & Buldur, S. (2010). Öğretmen davranışlarının kamu meslek etiği ilkelerine uygunluğu. e- International Journal of Educational Research. 1(2), 35-50.
43. Yayla, A. (2005). Eğitim kavramının etik açıdan analizi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Elektronik
44. Eğitim Dergisi, 2(1), 51-62.
45. Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H.(2008). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
46. White, T.I. (1993). Business Ethics: A Philosophical Reader, New York: Macmillan Publishing.