Students’ Opinions Regarding the Effect of Reading Strategies Instruction Based on Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach

Öz

This study aims at investigating students’ opinions regarding the effect of reading strategies instruction—based on Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach and applied in a French class as a second language in higher education—over their reading skills and strategy use. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews both before and after the intervention. Participants of the study were six students representing high, medium and low proficiency levels in reading. Descriptive analysis was employed for data analysis. Findings generally indicate that students hold positive opinions about the effect of reading strategies instruction over their reading skills and strategy use. Furthermore, after the strategy instruction, a certain variation among the strategies applied by students was detected and students were noted to have higher levels of awareness concerning their reading skills and strategy use

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Reading strategies
• strategy instruction
• second language
• CALLA

Kaynakça

1. Allen, S. (2003). An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction. IRAL, 41, 319-338.
2. Anderson, N. (1999). Exploring second language reading: issues and strategies. Toronto, Ontario, Kanada: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
3. Arpacıoğlu, E. B. (2007). The effect of combined strategy instruction on reading comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ankara: Bilkent University Graduate School of Education.
4. Bouvet, E. (2002). Reading in a foreign language: Strategic variation between readers of differing proficiency. Flinders University Languages Group Online Review. 1 (1). Retrieved May 13, 2008 from http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/deptlang/fulgor/.
5. Bouvet, E., & Close, E. (2006). Online reading strategy guidance in a foreign language: Five case studies in French. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29 (1): 7.1–7.19.
6. Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? The Language Teacher. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://jalt-publications.org/old_tlt/files/98/mar/carrell.html
7. Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional Science, 26, 97-112. Retrieved April 28, 2008, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/q3522p7533722313/fulltext.pdf
8. Chamot, A. U. (1995). Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: CALLA in Arlington, Virginia. The Bilingual Research Journal, 19 (3-4), 379-394. Retrieved December 13, 2008 from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/nabe/brj/v19 /index.htm#34

9. Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. D., & Robbins, J. (1999). The Learning strategies handbook. New York: Pearson Education.
10. Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J.M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York.
11. Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J.M. (1996). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 96 (3), 259-273. Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.jstor.org/
12. Chamot, A.U., & Robbins, J. (2006). Helping Struggling students become good language learners. National Capital Language Resource Center. Retrieved October 13, 2008 from http://www.calla.ws/ CALLA_FL.doc.
13. Chamot, A.U., Thomppson, I., Küpper, L.,Barnhardt, S. & Barrueta M. (1990). Learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom: reading. McLean, Virginia: Interstate Research Associates. Retrieved December 13, 2018 from Eric database.
14. Cohen, A. D. (2000). Strategies-Based Instruction for Learners of a Second Language. National Association of secondary school principals (NASSP) Bulletin, 84, 10-18. Retrieved September 23, 2008, http://bul.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/84/612/10
15. Cohen, A. (2003). Strategy Training for Second Language Learners. Retrieved September 23, 2008 from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/0302cohen.html.
16. Cohen, A.D., & Weaver, S. J. (2005). Styles and strategies-based instruction: A teachers' guide. CARLA Working Paper Series A rewritten version of Paper 7. University of Minnesota. Retrieved September 23, 2008 from http://elechina.super-red.es/cohen-weaver.pdf
17. Cummins, J. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly,14 (2), 175-187. Retrieved June 18, 2009 from http://www.jestor.org/stable/3586312.
18. Çubukçu, F. (2008). How to enhance reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. The Journal of International Social Research, N. 2, p. 83-93.
19. Grenfel, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. Retrieved 10054574&ppg=86 22, 2008 from
20. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/anadolu/Doc?id=
21. Handyside, M. B. (2007). The effects of metacognitive training on English language learner's reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Catholic University of America, Washington.
22. Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 9, N.1. Retrieved December 15, 2012 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/hoepfl.html
23. Kantarci, F. (2006). Students’ awareness of reading strategies. Unpublished master’s thesis. Bilkent University, Ankara.
24. Karbalaei, A. (2011). Assessing reading strategy training based on CALLA model in EFL and ESL context. Ikala Revistan de Language y Eultuza, 16, 27, 167-188. Retrieved August 22, 2011 from http://revinut.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/viewArticle/8659
25. Kern, R. G. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 135-149.
26. Koda, K. (2007). Insights into second language reading: Cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom,
27. Lynch, J. (1993). Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (Project CALLA), community school district 2 special alternative instruction program. Final evaluation report, 1992-93.OREA Report. New York: New York City Board of Education. Retrieved December 13, 2008 from Eric database.
28. Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for teacher researcher (Second edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education
29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). An Expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis, (Second edition) California: SAGE Publications International Educational and Professional Publisher.
30. Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
31. Özkan Gürses, M., & Adıgüzel, O. (2013). The effect of strategy instruction based on the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach over reading comprehension and strategy use. Journal of Education and Learning, 2 (2), p. 55-68.
32. Takallou, F. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Assian EFL Journal. 272-300. Retrieved August 22, 2011 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/March-2011-ft.pdf.
33. Taylor, A. M., Stevens, J.R., & Asher, W. (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension. In J.M. Norris & L.Ortega (Eds.). Language Learning & Language Teaching Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (p.213-244). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
34. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Altıncı basım). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.