Design And Content of A Program for Physical Literacy Education: New Approaches and Future Suggestions

Öz

This study examines the design and content of a 12-week program for physical literacy education. The aim is to present new approaches and forward-looking suggestions to support the development of physical literacy. The program focuses on the components of skills, motivation, confidence and knowledge that aim to increase individuals' participation in lifelong physical activity. Detailed explanations are provided on the pedagogical methods applied in the education process and how the content is structured, and the importance of a flexible structure that can be adapted to the needs of the participants is emphasized. This research is a qualitative model proposal study that aims to present the theoretical framework of a program developed on physical literacy education. Based on the existing literature, the structure, objectives and evaluation methods of the program are defined. The research design is structured within the framework of descriptive research method and aims to present a theoretical model. In this context, existing studies on the definitions, components and importance of the concept of physical literacy are examined. The learning objectives of the program are determined and targets are created for the basic components of physical literacy (motivation, movement skills, social skills, etc.). The program is designed in a modular structure according to different learning levels. In each module, activities and practices that will provide students with physical literacy skills are planned. Theoretical criteria to be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program are determined. The evaluation is based on performance-based measurements, self-assessment and observational techniques.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Physical literacy
• curriculum design
• pedagogical approaches

Fiziksel Okuryazarlık Eğitimine Yönelik Bir Programı Tasarımı ve İçeriği: Yeni Yaklaşımlar ve İleriye Dönük Öneriler

Öz

Bu çalışma, fiziksel okuryazarlık eğitimine yönelik 12 haftalık bir programın tasarımını ve içeriğini incelemektedir. Amaç, fiziksel okuryazarlığın gelişimini desteklemek üzere yeni yaklaşımlar ve ileriye dönük öneriler sunmaktır. Program, bireylerin yaşam boyu fiziksel aktiviteye katılımını artırmayı hedefleyen beceri, motivasyon, güven ve bilgi bileşenlerine odaklanmaktadır. Eğitim sürecinde uygulanan pedagojik yöntemler ve içeriğin nasıl yapılandırıldığına dair ayrıntılı açıklamalar yapılmış, katılımcıların ihtiyaçlarına göre adapte edilebilecek esnek bir yapının önemine vurgu yapılmıştır. Bu araştırma, fiziksel okuryazarlık eğitimi üzerine geliştirilmiş bir programın teorik çerçevesinin sunulmasını amaçlayan nitel bir model önerisi çalışmasıdır. Mevcut literatüre dayanarak programın yapısı, hedefleri ve değerlendirme yöntemleri tanımlanmıştır. Araştırma tasarımı, betimsel araştırma yöntemi çerçevesinde yapılandırılmıştır ve kuramsal bir model sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu kapsamda fiziksel okuryazarlık kavramının tanımları, bileşenleri ve önemine dair mevcut çalışmalar incelenmiştir. Programın öğrenme hedefleri belirlenmiş ve fiziksel okuryazarlığın temel bileşenlerine (motivasyon, hareket becerileri, sosyal beceriler vb.) yönelik hedefler oluşturulmuştur. Program, farklı öğrenme düzeylerine göre modüler bir yapıda tasarlanmıştır. Her modülde, öğrencilere fiziksel okuryazarlık becerilerini kazandıracak etkinlikler ve uygulamalar planlanmıştır. Programın etkinliğini değerlendirmek için kullanılacak kuramsal ölçütler belirlenmiştir. Değerlendirme, performans temelli ölçümler, öz değerlendirme ve gözlemsel teknikler üzerine kuruludur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fiziksel okuryazarlık
• Eğitim programı tasarımı
• Pedagojik yaklaşımlar
• Kuramsal model

Kaynakça

1. Allen, H., & Coggan, A. (2006). Training and racing with a power meter (pp. 1–225). Velopress.
2. Bayer, S., Petre, G., & Ryan, R. (2021). Physical literacy in children and adolescents: A comprehensive review. Journal of Physical Education and Health, 12(3), 43–57.
3. Boucher, M., Burke, S., Hutsebaut, J., Jurbala, P., Travers, S., Arseneau, L., et al. (2013). Long-term development para-cycling Canada (Para-Cycling), 24.
4. Caffarella, R. S., & Daffron, S. R. (2013). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
5. Casey, A. (2017). Technology and digital literacies in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(2), 147–153.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
7. Darwin, C. (2021). İnsanda ve hayvanlarda duyguların ifade edilmesi (B. Kılıç, Çev.; K. Cankoçak, Ed., 2. bs.). Alfa Yayınları.
8. De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., & Shibli, S. A. (2006). Conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 185–215.

9. Edwards, L. C., Bryant, A. S., Keegan, R. J., Morgan, K., & Jones, A. M. (2018). Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(1), 113–126.
10. Robinson, D. B., & Randall, L. (2017). Teaching physical literacy through games. Physical and Health Education Journal, 83(1), 20–25.
11. Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? American Psychologist, 99(3), 550–553.
12. Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2019). Body language in sport. In Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 1201–1219). Wiley.
13. Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2016). Nonverbal communication of confidence in soccer referees: An experimental test of Darwin’s leakage hypothesis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(6), 590–597.
14. Gordon, C. C., Chumlea, W. C., & Roche, A. F. (1988). Stature, recumbent length and weight. In T. G. Lohman, A. F. Roche, & R. Martorell (Eds.), Anthropometric standardization reference manual (p. 952). Human Kinetics Books.
15. Güldenpenning, I., Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2017). How to trick your opponent: A review article on deceptive actions in interactive sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–12.
16. Hill, D. W., Poole, D. C., & Smith, J. C. (2002). The relationship between power and the time to achieve VO2max. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 34(4), 709–714.
17. Jeffries, O., Simmons, R., Patterson, S. D., & Waldron, M. (2021). Functional threshold power is not equivalent to lactate parameters in trained cyclists. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(10), 2790–2794.
18. Kunde, W., Skirde, S., & Weigelt, M. (2011). Trust my face: Cognitive factors of head fakes in sports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 110–127.
19. Lundvall, S. (2015). Physical literacy in the field of physical education – A challenge and a possibility. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 113–118.
20. Lloyd, R. S., Saunders, J. M., & Oliver, J. L. (2016). Physical literacy: A key to lifelong physical activity. Sports Science Review, 24(3–4), 105–114.
21. Mandigo, J., Francis, N., Lodewyk, K., & Lopez, R. (2009). Physical literacy for educators. Physical and Health Education Journal, 75(3), 27–30.
22. Menting, S. G. P., Hanley, B., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., & Hettinga, F. J. (2022). Pacing behaviour of middle-long distance running and race-walking athletes at the IAAF U18 and U20 World Championship finals. European Journal of Sport Science, 22(6), 780–789.
23. Moll, T., Jordet, G., & Pepping, G. J. (2010). Emotional contagion in soccer penalty shootouts: Celebration of individual success is associated with ultimate team success. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(9), 983–992.
24. Morpa. (1997). Spor ansiklopedisi (M. Yakın, İ. Bodur, & A. Yalman, Eds., pp. 198–209). Morpa Kültür Yayınları Ltd. Şti.
25. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
26. Physical Literacy Research Group. (2019). A framework for physical literacy. Canadian Journal of Sport Science, 44(1), 1–10.
27. Robinson, D. B., & Randall, L. (2017). Teaching physical literacy through games. Physical and Health Education Journal, 83(1), 20–25.
28. Roetert, E. P., & MacDonald, L. C. (2015). Unpacking the physical literacy concept for K–12 physical education: What should we expect the learner to master? Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 108–112.
29. Rusdiana, A. (2020). Analysis differences of VO2max between direct and indirect measurement in badminton, cycling and rowing. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 9(3), 2322–3537.
30. Shariff, A. F., & Tracy, J. L. (2011). What are emotion expressions for? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 395–399.
31. Schüler, J., Stähler, J., & Wolff, W. (2023). Mind-over-body beliefs in sport and exercise: A driving force for training volume and performance, but with risks for exercise addiction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Article 102462.
32. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
33. Vast, R. L., Young, R. L., & Thomas, P. R. (2010). Emotions in sport: Perceived effects on attention, concentration, and performance. Australian Psychologist, 45(2), 132–140.
34. Wasserman, K., Hansen, J. E., Sue, D. Y., Stringer, W. W., Sietsema, K. E., Sun, X. G., et al. (2011). Principles of exercise testing and interpretation including pathophysiology and clinical applications (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
35. Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. Routledge.