Sporcularda Doping Kullanım Eğiliminin Spora Bağlılık Ve Öz Disiplin Düzeyi Açısından Sistematik Bibliyografik Literatür İncelemesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın en temel amacı, sporcularda doping kullanım eğilimini spora bağlılık ve öz disiplin düzeyi açısından incelemektir. Çalışma, sistematik bibliyografik literatür incelemesi biçiminde tasarlanmıştır. Hazırlanan bu derleme, doping eğilimi, spora bağlılık, öz disiplin, ahlaki çözülme, motivasyon iklimi ve değer temelli eğitim temalarına odaklanmıştır. Kaynak havuzu, ekli çalışmalar ve DOI bilgisi doğrulanabilen uluslararası literatür üzerinden oluşturulmuştur. DOI bilgisi bulunmayan yerli metinler bağlamsal arka plan için değerlendirilmiştir. Ana kaynakça ise DOI içeren çalışmalardan kurulmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular, doping eğiliminin tek bir değişkenle açıklanamayacağını göstermektedir. Bu nedenle spora bağlılık koruyucu da olabilmekte, risk artırıcı da olabilmektedir. Uyumlu tutku, temiz spor kimliği ve görev yönelimli motivasyon iklimi doping eğilimini zayıflatmaktadır. Buna karşılık obsesif tutku, başarı baskısı, statü kaybı korkusu ve normatif onay doping niyetini güçlendirmektedir. Öz disiplin ve öz düzenleyici yeterlik ise doping karşıtı davranışın en önemli kişisel kaynaklarındandır. Ahlaki çözülme, bu ilişkilerin merkezinde yer almaktadır. Sonuç olarak doping eğilimi, bireysel irade ile çevresel baskı arasındaki dinamik bir kırılganlık alanı oluşturmaktadır. Etkili önleme programları yalnızca yasak ve yaptırıma dayanmamalıdır. Programlar, değer temelli eğitim, öz disiplin geliştirme, sosyal çevreyi dönüştürme ve spora bağlılığı sağlıklı biçimde yapılandırma hedeflerini birlikte içermek zorundadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Doping
• doping eğilimi
• spora bağlılık
• öz disiplin
• ahlaki çözülme
• temiz spor

A Systematic Bibliographic Literature Review Of Athletes' Tendency To Use Doping In Terms Of Sport Commitment And Self-Discipline Levels

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to examine athletes' tendency to use doping in terms of sport commitment and self-discipline levels. The study was designed as a systematic literature review. This review focuses on the themes of doping tendency, sport commitment, self-discipline, moral disengagement, motivational climate, and value-based education. The source pool was created from the attached studies and international literature for which DOI information could be verified. Domestic texts without DOI information were evaluated for contextual background. The main bibliography was built from studies that include DOI information. The findings show that doping tendency cannot be explained by a single variable. Therefore, sport commitment can be both protective and risk-enhancing. Harmonious passion, a clean sport identity, and a task-oriented motivational climate weaken doping tendency. By contrast, obsessive passion, performance pressure, fear of status loss, and normative approval strengthen doping intention. Self-discipline and self-regulatory efficacy are among the most important personal resources for anti-doping behavior. Moral disengagement lies at the center of these relationships. Consequently, doping tendency constitutes a dynamic area of vulnerability between individual will and environmental pressure. Effective prevention programs should not rely only on prohibition and sanctions. Programs should jointly include the goals of value-based education, self-discipline development, transformation of the social environment, and healthy structuring of sport commitment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Doping
• doping tendency
• sport commitment
• self-discipline
• moral disengagement
• clean sport.

Kaynakça

1. Barkoukis, V., Lazuras, L., Tsorbatzoudis, H., & Rodafinos, A. (2013). Motivational and social cognitive predictors of doping intentions in elite sports: An integrated approach. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23(5), 330– 340. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12068
2. Chan, D. K. C., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., Dimmock, J. A., Donovan, R. J., Keatley, D. A., Hardcastle, S. J., & Hagger, M. S. (2015). Self-control, self-regulation, and doping in sport: A test of the strength-energy model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0250
3. Chirico, A., Lucidi, F., Pica, G., Santo, D., Galli, F., Alivernini, F., Mallia, L., Zelli, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Pierro, A. (2021). The motivational underpinnings of intentions to use doping in sport: A sample of young non-professional athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105411
4. Guo, L., Yao, S., & Chen, Y. (2021). Perceived motivational climates and doping intention in adolescent athletes: The mediating role of moral disengagement and sportspersonship. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 611636. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611636
5. Hodge, K., Hargreaves, E. A., Gerrard, D., & Lonsdale, C. (2013). Psychological mechanisms underlying doping attitudes in sport: Motivation and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35(4), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.35.4.419
6. Lucidi, F., Zelli, A., Mallia, L., Grano, C., Russo, P. M., & Violani, C. (2008). The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents’ use of doping substances. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(5), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701579370
7. Morente-Sánchez, J., & Zabala, M. (2013). Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports medicine. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 43(6), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x
8. Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y. Y., Barkoukis, V., & Backhouse, S. (2014). Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: A meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44(11), 1603–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0240-4

9. Petróczi, A., & Aidman, E. (2008). Psychological drivers in doping: The life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 3, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-7
10. Reardon, C. L., & Creado, S. (2014). Drug abuse in athletes. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 5, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S53784
11. Ring, C., & Hurst, P. (2019). The effects of moral disengagement mechanisms on doping likelihood are mediated by guilt and moderated by moral traits. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 40, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.09.001
12. Ring, C., & Kavussanu, M. (2018). The role of self-regulatory efficacy, moral disengagement and guilt on doping likelihood: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(5), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1324206
13. Tarakçıoğlu S. (2020). Expert views on the causes and solutions of the doping issue in Turkey’s sports. Turk Sports Med. 55(2):156-64. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjsm.2020.172
14. Veltmaat, A., Dreiskämper, D., Brueckner, S., Bondarev, D., Heyes, A., Barkoukis, V., Elbe, A. M., Lazuras, L., Maria, A., Zelli, A., & Petróczi, A. (2023). Context matters: Athletes’ perception of dopers’ values, actions and vulnerabilities. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, Article 1229679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1229679
15. Vlad, R. A., Hancu, G., Popescu, G. C., & Lungu, I. A. (2018). Doping in Sports, a Never-Ending Story? Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 8(4), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2018.062
16. Zorba, E., & Atalay, B. (2024). Üniversite sporcularının doping ile ilgili düşüncelerinin incelenmesi. Herkes için Spor ve Rekreasyon Dergisi, 6(3), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1516989