Web of science veri tabanında yer alan bilgi yönetimi makalelerinin bibliyometrik analizi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 154 - 176, 30.12.2024

İlknur Taştan , Bilge Kural

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yönetim ve organizasyon literatüründe bilgi yönetimi alanında öne çıkan gelişmeleri, eğilimleri, yazarları, yayınları, dergileri ve kavramları belirleyerek gelecek araştırmalara yön göstermektir. Araştırma amacından hareketle 2000 yılından itibaren bilgi yönetimi alanında Web of Science veri tabanında yayınlanan 3445 makale bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle VOSviewer aracılığı ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler doğrultusunda yayın sayısının yıllar itibari ile dağılımı, üretken yazarların kimler olduğu, etkili makalelerin, ülkelerin ve dergilerin hangileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmada bu tespitlerin yanında alanda sık olarak kullanılan anahtar kelimelerin ne olduğu ve yıllar itibari ile öne çıkan araştırma konularının neler olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Gelecekte alanda yapılacak çalışmalarda yön göstermesi açısından en kritik bulgularından biri ise son üç yılda bilgi yönetimi ile ilişkili olarak teknolojik yenilik, açık yenilik, çevresel dinamizm, yenilik performansı, Covid-19, dijital dönüşüm, iş modeli yeniliği, yeşil yenilik ve bilgi gizleme konularının öne çıktığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilgi Yönetimi, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Web of Science

Etik Beyan

Çalışmada bilimsel değerlere ve araştırma sürecinde tüm etik değerlere uyduğumuzu beyan ederiz.

Bibliometric analysis of knowledge management articles in the web of science database

Öz

The aim of this study is to guide future research by highlighting prominent developments, trends, authors, publications, journals, and concepts in the field of knowledge management within the management and organization literature. In accordance with the research objective, a bibliometric analysis was conducted using the VOSviewer tool on 3,445 knowledge management articles published in the Web of Science database since 2000. The analyses conducted reveal the distribution of publications by years, the identities of productive authors, and the identification of influential articles, countries, and journals. The research also reveals the frequently used keywords in the field and the prominent research topics over by years. One of the most critical findings that will guide future studies in the field is the emergence of topics such as technological innovation, open innovation, environmental dynamism, innovation performance, COVİD-19, digital transformation, business model innovation, green innovation, and knowledge hiding as prominent areas of focus in knowledge management over the past three years.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Knowledge Management, Bibliometric Analysis, Web of Science

Kaynakça

• Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2012). Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(4), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211246185
• Aktan, C.C. & Vural, İ.Y. (2005). Bilgi Çağında Bilginin Yönetimi. Aktan, C.C. & Vural İ. Y. (Ed.), Bilgi Çağı Bilgi Yönetimi ve Bilgi Sistemleri (pp. 1-30) içinde. Çizgi Kitabevi.
• Costa, V., & Monteiro, S. (2016). Key knowledge management processes for innovation: A systematic literature review. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 46(3), 386–410.
• Chaudhuri, R., Chavan, G., Vadalkar, S., Vrontis, D., & Pereira, V. (2020). Two-decade bibliometric overview of publications in the Journal of Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1550–1574. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0571
• Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2007). How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management-The social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.11.001
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
• Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105, 1809–1831.
• Farooq, R. (2023). Knowledge management and performance: a bibliometric analysis based on Scopus and WOS data (1988–2021). Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(7), 1948–1991. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2022-0443
• Farooq, R. (2024). Mapping the field of knowledge management: A bibliometric analysis using R. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(6), 1178–1206). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2021-0089
• Fauzi, M. A. (2023). A bibliometric review on knowledge management in tourism and hospitality: Past, present and future trends. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(6), 2178–2201. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2022-0381
• Feng, L., Zhao, Z., Wang, J., & Zhang, K. (2022). The ımpact of knowledge management capabilities on innovation performance from dynamic capabilities perspective: moderating the role of environmental dynamism. Sustainability, 14(8), 4577. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084577
• Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
• Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1655–1687. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0497
• Giudice, M. Del, & Maggioni, V. (2014). Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: A global view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 841–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0264
• Güçlü, N., & Sotirofski, K. (2006). Bilgi yönetimi. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 4(4), 351–373. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tebd/issue/26118/275145
• Islam, M. A., & Widen, G. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of the VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems: 2000–2020. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(3), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2020-0126
• Karaboğa, T., Sehi̇Toğlu, Y., & Karaboğa, H. A. (2022).The evolution of big data in knowledge management: a bibliometric analysis. Bilgi Dunyasi, 23(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2022.645
• Kavalić, M., Nikolić, M., Radosav, D., Stanisavljev, S., & Pečujlija, M. (2021). Influencing factors on knowledge management for organizational sustainability. Sustainability, 13(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031497
• Koç, T., Kurt, K., & Akbiyik, A. (2019). A brief summary of knowledge management domain: 10-year history of the journal of knowledge management. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.128
• Koohang, A., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Goluchowski, J. (2017). The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: A research model. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2016-0072
• Kraus, S., Ferraris, A., & Bertello, A. (2023). The future of work: How innovation and digitalization re-shape the workplace. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), 100438.
• López-Nicolás, C., & Meroño-Cerdán, Á. L. (2021). The role of digital transformation in the corporate response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 44–53.
• Litvaj, I., Ponisciakova, O., Stancekova, D., Svobodova, J., & Mrazik, J. (2022).Decision-making procedures and their relation to knowledge management and quality management. Sustainability, 14(1), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010572
• Makhloufi, L., Vasa L., Rosak-Szyrocka J., Djermani,F.,(2023). Understanding the impact of big data analytics and knowledge management on green innovation practices and organizational performance: The moderating effect of government support, Sustainability, MDPI, 15(11), 1–22.
• Odabaş, H. (2006). Bilgi yönetimi. In H.Odabaş & H.Anameriç (Eds), Bilgi, (pp. 99– 108). Referans Yayıncılık.
• Ode, E., & Ayavoo, R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002
• Özdemirci, F., & Aydın, C. (2007). Kurumsal bilgi kaynakları ve bilgi yönetimi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği,21(2),164–185. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tk/issue/48938/624263
• Özgener, Ş. (2005). Global ölçekte değer yaratan bilgi yönetimi stratejileri. In C.C. Aktan & İ. Y. Vural (Eds.), Bilgi çağı bilgi yönetimi ve bilgi sistemleri, (pp. 267–295). Çizgi Kitabevi.
• Panda, S., & Rath, S. K. (2021). Information technology capability, knowledge management capability, and organizational agility: The role of environmental factors. Journal of Management and Organization, 27(1), 148–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.9
• Polas, M. R. H., Tabash, M. I., Bhattacharjee, A., & Dávila, G. A. (2023). Knowledge management practices and green innovation in SMEs: The role of environmental awareness towards environmental sustainability. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(5), 1601–1622. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2021-2671
• Qiu, J., & Lv, H. (2014). An overview of knowledge management research viewed through the web of science (1993-2012). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(4), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2013-0133
• Rafi, N., Ahmed, A., Shafique, I., & Kalyar, M. N. (2021). Knowledge management capabilities and organizational agility as liaisons of business performance. South Asian Journal of Business Studies. 11(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-05-2020-0145
• Shahzadi, A., Li, S., Sahibzada, U. F., Malik, M., Khalid, R., & Afshan, G. (2021). The dynamic relationship of knowledge management processes and project success: modeling the mediating role of knowledge worker satisfaction. Business Process Management Journal, 27(6), 1657–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2021-0500
• Tok, A. (2022). Bilgi Yönetimi Dergisi’nin betimsel analizi. Bilgi ve Belge Araştırmaları Dergisi / The Journal of Information and Documentation Studies, 17, 61–82. https://doi.org/10.26650/bba.2022.17.1124394
• Van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety science, 108, 248–258.
• Yew Wong, K. (2005). Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(3), 261–279). https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510590101