AN INNOVATIVE LEARNING APPROACH IN EDUCATION: COLLABORATIVE CREATIVITY MODEL

Abstract

Changes in the 21st century have apparently led to the transformation of the structure of education and training activities and required a different perspective on the education and training process. At this point, education programs emphasize the ability of individuals to evaluate real-time problems in a multifaceted and creative way, to work in harmony and to use their high-level thinking skills. In order to develop creativity skills in individuals and to produce, evaluate and apply innovative solutions, social processes should be given more importance rather than individual efforts. The most important step to create a creative education ecosystem in line with changing conditions is to place collaborative creativity into the center of education. For this reason, it is important to reveal how collaborative creativity is conceptualized, especially in educational environments. The objective of this research is, in this context, to reveal collaborative creativity and its theoretical basis, structure, components, models and applications in the context of education at the theoretical level. In the research, a compilation was made on collaborative creativity with a focus on education and scientific studies related to the subject were examined by means of the literature review method. Thus, information about collaborative creativity, which is an innovative learning model in education, and its reflections on education was collected and the subject was addressed from different perspectives. It can be said that the arguments of this study are very important in terms of evaluating the role of collaborative creativity in education as well as being explanatory about its basic elements and components.

Keywords

• Collaborative Creativity
• Innovative Approach
• 21st Century Skills
• Education-Training Process

EĞİTİMDE YENİLİKÇİ BİR ÖĞRENME YAKLAŞIMI: İŞBİRLİKLİ YARATICILIK MODELİ

Öz

21. yüzyılda yaşanan değişimler, eğitim ve öğretim faaliyetlerinin yapısını değiştirmekte ve eğitim-öğretim sürecine farklı bir bakış açısı geliştirilmesini gerektirmektedir. Bu noktada eğitim programları, bireylerin gerçek yaşamda karşılaştığı problemleri çok yönlü ve yaratıcı şekilde değerlendirebilmelerine, iş birliği içerisinde uyumlu çalışabilmelerine ve üst düzey düşünme becerilerini kullanabilmelerine vurgu yapmaktadır. Bireylerdeki yaratıcılık becerisinin geliştirilmesi, yenilikçi çözümlerin üretilmesi, değerlendirilmesi ve uygulanması için, bireysel çabalardan çok sosyal süreçlere önem verilmesi gerekmektedir. Değişen şartlara uygun, yaratıcı eğitim ekosistemini oluşturmak için atılacak en önemli adım işbirlikli yaratıcılığın eğitim odağına yerleştirilmesidir. Bu nedenle özellikle eğitim ortamlarında işbirlikli yaratıcılığın nasıl kavramsallaştırıldığının ortaya koyulması önemli görülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, işbirlikli yaratıcılığı ve bunun eğitim bağlamındaki teorik temelinin, yapısının, bileşenlerinin, model ve uygulamalarının alan yazın incelemelerinden hareketle teorik düzeyde ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmada işbirlikli yaratıcılığa ilişkin eğitim odağında bir derleme yapılarak konuya ilişkin bilimsel çalışmalar alan yazın taraması yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Böylelikle eğitimde yenilikçi bir öğrenme modeli olan işbirlikçi yaratıcılık ve bunun eğitime yansımaları hakkında bilgiler toplanmış, farklı bakış açılarından konu ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın işbirlikli yaratıcılığın, temel öğeleri ve bileşenleri hakkında açıklayıcı olmasının yanı sıra eğitimde özgün bir ürün elde etmedeki rolünün değerlendirilmesi açısından oldukça önemli olduğu söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İşbirlikli Yaratıcılık
• Yenilikçi Yaklaşım
• 21.Yüzyıl Becerileri
• Eğitim-Öğretim Süreci

Kaynakça

1. Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00184
2. Abrams, Z. I. (2005). Asynchronous CMC, collaboration and the development of critical thinking in a graduate seminar in applied linguistics. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2G30C
3. Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. Visualization: Theory and practice in science Education. New York: Springer.
4. Aragon, C. R. & Williams, A. (2011, May). Collaborative creativity: a complex systems model with distributed affect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1875-1884).
5. Astutik, S., Susantini, E., Madlazim, Nur, M. & Supeno. (2020). The Effectiveness of Collaborative Creativity Learning Models (CCL) on Secondary Schools Scientific Creativity Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3).
6. Astutik, S., Nur, M. & Susantini, E. (2016). Validity of collaborative creativity (CC) models. In The 3th international conference on research, implementation and education of mathematics and science (pp.73-78). Yogyakarta.
7. Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). Developing teaching material for physics based on collaborative creativity learning (ccl) model to improve scientific creativity of junior high school students. Journal of Physics Research and Its Application, 8(2), 91-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v8n2.p91-105
8. Ayas, M. B. & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001

9. Baruah, J. & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Enhancing creativity in groups: The search for synergy. In M. Neale, B. Mannix & J. Goncalo (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams (pp. 29–56). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Press.
10. Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L. & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001
11. Bettoni, M., Bernhard, W. & Bittel, N. (2015). Collaborative creativity with eCiC. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3925-3932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1135
12. Biasutti, M. (2015). Creativity in virtual spaces: Communication modes employed during collaborative online music composition. Thinking skills and creativity, 17, 117-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.06.002
13. Bouchard, T. J., Jr. & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028621
14. Brand, B. R. & Glasson, G. E. (2004). Crossing cultural borders into science teaching: Early life experiences, racial and ethnic identities, and beliefs about diversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 119-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10131
15. Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., Crissman, J. L., Terenzini, P. T., Bernal, E. M. & Pascarella, E. T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students’ development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 20-24.
16. Candy, L. & Edmonds, E. (1996). Creative design of the lotus bicycle: Implications for knowledge support systems research. Design Studies, 17(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(95)00026-N
17. Care, E. & Griffin, P. (2014). An approach to assessment of collaborative problem solving. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning¸ 9(3), 367-388.
18. Chaharbaghi, K. & Cripps, S. (2007). Collective creativity: wisdom or oxymoron? Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(8), 626-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090590710833679
19. Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Ogée, J., Allard, V. & Carrara, A. (2005). Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437(7058), 529-533.
20. Cronin, M. A. & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 761-773.
21. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013). Flow: The psychology of happiness. London: Random House.
22. Curseu, P. L., Schruijer, S. G. L. & Boros, S. (2007). The effects of groups’ variety and disparity on groups’ cognitive complexity. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 187-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.187
23. De Rosa, D. M., Smith, C. L. & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1549–1581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.003
24. Dennis, A. R. & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531-537.
25. Denson, N. & Zhang, S. (2010). The impact of student experiences with diversity on developing graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 529-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070903222658
26. Diehl, M. & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.
27. Douthitt, S. S., Eby, L. T. & Simon, S. A. (1999). Diversity of life experiences: The development and validation of a biographical measure of receptiveness to dissimilar others. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 112-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00111
28. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. S. Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
29. Ellis, A. J., Mai, K. M. & Christian, J. S. (2013). Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 948-961. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033725
30. Eteläpelto, A. & Lahti, J. (2008). The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 226-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.003
31. Fominykh, M., Praslova-Førland, E., Morozov, M., Smorkalov, A. & Divitini, M. (2014, June). Facilitating creative collaborative activities with dedicated tools in a 3D virtual world. In International Conference on Smart Technology based Education and Training (STET), Chania, Greece.
32. Fischer, G. (2014). Learning, social creativity, and cultures of participation. In A. Sannino, & V. Ellis (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity: Activity-Theoretical and Sociocultural Studies (pp. 198-215). New York (NY): Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
33. Frederiksen, M. H. & Knudsen, M. P. (2017). From creative ideas to innovation performance: The role of assessment criteria. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12204
34. Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C. & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56(4), 591-605. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144
35. Glăveanu, V. P. (2017). Creativity in perspective: A sociocultural and critical account. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 31(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1271376
36. Grossen, M. (2008). Methods for studying collaborative creativity: An original and adventurous blend. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 246-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.005
37. Harrison, D. A. & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
38. Heslin, P. A. (2009). Better than brainstorming? Potential contextual boundary conditions to brainwriting for idea generation in organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X285642
39. Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K. & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem-solving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (pp. 37-56). Dordrecht: Springer
40. Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189-1199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189
41. Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
42. Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C. & Meyer, W. (2013). Increasing student’s scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20
43. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
44. Jackson, S. E., May, K. E. & Whitney, K. (1995). Under the dynamics of diversity in decisionmaking teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204-261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
45. Kang, K. A., Kim, S., Kim, S. J., Oh, J. & Lee, M. (2015). Comparison of knowledge, confidence in skills performance (CSP) and satisfaction in problem-based learning (PBL) and simulation with PBL educational modalities in caring for children with bronchiolitis. Nurse Education Today, 35(2), 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.006
46. Kaplan, S., Brooks-Shesler, L., King, E. B. & Zaccaro, S. (2009). Thinking inside the box: How conformity promotes creativity and innovation. In J. A. Goncalo, E. A. Mannix & M. A. Neale (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Creativity in Groups (pp. 229-265). Bradford, UK: Emerald Group.
47. Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
48. Kelly, R. (2020). Collaborative creativity: Educating for creative development, innovation and entrepreneurship. Brush Education.
49. Ken Robinson, S. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford. http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=9gOOjW66GeQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=ke n+robinson&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=ken%20robinson&f=false
50. Klocek, S. (2011, April 28). Better together, the practice of successful creative collaboration. Cooper Journal, Retrieved from http://www.cooper.com/journal/2011/04/great_creative_partnership_pai
51. Korde, R. & Paulus, P. B. (2017). Alternating individual and group idea generation: Finding the elusive synergy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.002
52. Kurtuluş, N. (2012). Yaratıcı düşünmeye dayalı öğretim uygulamalarının bilimsel yaratıcılık, bilimsel süreç becerileri ve akademik başarıya etkisi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
53. Linsey, J. S. & Becker, B. (2011). Effectiveness of brainwriting techniques: Comparing nominal groups to real teams. In Design Creativity 2010 (pp. 165-171). London: Springer.
54. Littleton, K., Rojas-Drummond, S. & Miell, D. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: ’Collaborative creativity: Socio-cultural perspectives’. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 175-176. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.004
55. Liu, S., Joy, M. & Griffiths, N. (2010). Students' perceptions of the factors leading to unsuccessful group collaboration, In 10th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 565-569). Sousse, Tunisia.
56. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B. & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004423
57. Lynch, M. P. (2009). Truth as one and many. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Mamykina, L., Candy, L. & Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 96-99.
59. Maor, D. (2001). Development and formative evaluation of a multimedia program using interpretive research methodology. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(1), 75-98.
60. Miells, D. & Littleton, K. (2007). Collaborative creativity contemporary perspectives. Thinking Skill and Creativity, 2, 148-150.
61. Morrison, T. (2007). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. Vintage.
62. Mullen, A., English, F. & Kealy, A. (2014). The leadership identity journey: an artful reflection. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
63. Nijstad, B. A. & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1
64. Organisation for Economic, Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Scribner
65. Partlow P, J., Medeiros K & Mumford M, D. (2012). Creative thinking: Process, strategies and knowledge, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 38-47.
66. Paulus, P. B. & Baruah, J. (2019). Enhancing creativity in E-Planning: recommendations from a collaborative creativity perspective. In Crowdsourcing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1379-1401). IGI Global.
67. Paulus, P. B. & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of group brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x
68. Paulus, P. B. & Coskun, H. (2012). Group creativity, In J. M. Levine (Ed.), Group Processes (pp. 215-239). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. & Kohn, N. W. (2012). Collaborative creativity-Group creativity and team innovation. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 327-357). Academic Press.
69. Paulus, P. B. & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575
70. Paulus, P. B. & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
71. Paulus, P. B. & van der Zee, K. I. (2015). Creative processes in culturally diverse teams. In S. Otten, K. I. van der Zee & M. Brewer (Eds.), Towards Inclusive Organizations: Determinants of Successful Diversity Management at Work (pp. 108-131). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
72. Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., Arditti, L. E. & Korde, R. M. (2013). Understanding the group size effect in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 44, 332-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413479674
73. Paulus, P. B., Korde, R. M., Dickson, J. J., Carmeli, A. & Cohen-Meitar, R. (2015). Asynchronous brainstorming in an industrial setting: Exploratory studies. Human Factors, 57(6), 1076-1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815570374
74. Pettigrew, T. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
75. Pfauth, E-J. (2008, May, 19). Charles Leadbeater names five conditions for collaborative creativity. TNW Blog. Retrieved from http://thenextweb.com/2008/09/24/charles-leadbeater-names-five conditions-for-collaborative-creativity/
76. Pifarré, M., Martí, L. & Cujba, A. (2015, October). Technology-Enhanced Pedagogical Framework for Collaborative Creativity: Analyses of Students' Perception. 12th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (pp. 225-232), Ireland.
77. Putman, V. L. & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Brainstorming, brainstorming rules and decision making. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01304.x
78. Raj, H. & Saxena, D. R. (2016). Scientific creativity: A review of researches. European Academic Research, 4, 1122-1138.
79. Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A. & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 47-68.
80. Robinson, K. (2012, May 14). Creative IQ. Do Schools Kill Creativity? Huff Post - TED weekends. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sir-ken-robinson/do-schools-kill-creativity_b_2252942.html
81. Rogoff, B., Coppens, A. D., Alcata, L., Aceves-Azuara, I, Ruvalcaba, O, Lopez, A. & Dayton, A. (2017). Noticing learners’ strengths through cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 876-888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617718355
82. Rosen, Y. & Foltz, P. W. (2014). Assessing collaborative problem solving through automated technologies. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning¸ 9(3), 389-410.
83. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C. & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61
84. Sakr, M. (2018). Multimodal participation frameworks during young children’s collaborative drawing on paper and on the iPad. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.05.004
85. Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
86. Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of co-operation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
87. Sethi, R., Smith, D. C. & Park, C. W. (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.73.18833
88. Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V. & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Guidelines for experimental evaluation of idea generation methods in conceptual design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1315592
89. Shah, J. J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Summers, J. D. & Kulkarni, S. (2001). Collaborative sketching (c-sketch): An idea generation technique for engineering design. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 168-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01045.x
90. Sher, N., Kent, C. & Rafaeli, S. (2020, January). Creativity is connecting things: the role of network topology in fostering collective creativity in multi-participant asynchronous online discussions. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
91. Simmons, A. L. (2011). The influence of openness to experience and organizational justice on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 9-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545707
92. Susantini, E., Isnawati & Lisdiana, L. (2016). Effectiveness of genetics student worksheet to improve creative thinking skills of teacher candidate students. Journal of Science Education, 2(17), 74-79.
93. Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., Prahani, B.K. & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Effectiveness of creative responsibility-based teaching (CRBT) model on basic physics learning to increase student’s scientific creativity and responsibility. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 136-151.
94. Thomas, J. C., Lee, A. & Danis, C. (2002). Enhancing creative design via software tools. Communications of the ACM, 45, 112-115.
95. Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., et al. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20, 177–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005
96. Van Der Lugt, R. (2002). Brainsketching and how it differs from brainstorming. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00235
97. van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L. & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 38-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.003
98. Van Knippenberg, D. & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
99. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
100. VanGundy, A. B. (1995). Creativity in marketing. In J. Heilbrunn (Ed.), Marketing Encyclopedia: Issues and Trends Shaping the Future (pp. 31-39). Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
101. Wicaksono, I., Wasis & Madlazim. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual science teaching model (VS-TM) to improve student’s scientific creativity and concept mastery on senior high school physics subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 549-561.
102. Ziegler, R., Diehl, M. & Zijlstra, G. (2000). Idea production in nominal and virtual groups: Does computer-mediated communication improve group brainstorming? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200032003.