COVID-19 UZAKTAN EĞİTİM SÜRECİNDE ÖNE ÇIKAN FAKTÖRLER: BİR DEVLET ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları üzerine Türkiye’nin ve diğer ülkelerin deneyimi oldukça köklüdür; fakat, COVID-19 dönemindeki uzaktan eğitim, tam hazırlık yapılamadan örgün eğitimin tamamen yerini aldığı bir süreç olmuştur. Bu çalışma, Anadolu’da acil uzaktan eğitim sürecini görece başarılı yöneten bir devlet üniversitede yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın amacı COVID-19 uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğrencilerin deneyimlerini etkileyen sosyo-ekonomik faktörler ile birlikte öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitim sürecine dair algılarını, zorlandıkları ve/veya olumlu buldukları yönleri tespit etmeyi amaçlamıştır. Makalenin bir diğer önemli çıktısı da uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğrencilerin motivasyonu ve başarısında fark yaratan sosyo-ekonomik ve toplumsal cinsiyet temelli faktörler olmuştur. Araştırmada 484 öğrenci ile anket ve 3 adet odak grup çalışması yapılmış, sonuçlar tanımlayıcı şekilde makalede paylaşılmıştır. Sonuçların, acil uzaktan öğrenme dönemine görece olarak hazırlıksız yakalanan yüksek öğrenim kurumlarına, öğrenci algısını ve deneyimini anlamaları açısından bir kaynak olması beklenmektedir. Aynı zamanda, çalışma ile uzaktan eğitimde ‘hassas /kırılgan’ öğrenci gruplarının tespitinin yapılması ve uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğrencileri etkileyen sosyo-ekonomik eşitsizliklerin ortaya konması amaçlanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• uzaktan eğitim
• yükseköğretim
• covid-19
• sosyo-ekonomik eşitsizlikler
• toplumsal cinsiyet

Proje Numarası

120K273

PROMINENT FACTORS IN THE DISTANCE EDUCATION IN THE CONTEXT OF COVID-19: AN EXAMPLE OF A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY

Öz

The experience of Turkey and other countries on distance learning applications are quite deep-rooted; However, distance education in the COVID-19 period has been a process in which online education has completely replaced formal education in higher education without proper preparations. This study was conducted in a state university in Anatolia -which has been relatively successful at managing distance education period. The aim of the study is to identify the socio-economic factors affecting students' experiences with their perceptions about the distance education process, the aspects they find difficult and/or positive during the distance education process that started with COVID-19 pandemic. Another outcome of the article is underlining the socio-economic and gender-based factors that generate differences in students' motivation and success in the distance education. For these purposes, a questionnaire with 484 students and 3 focus group studies were conducted, and the results were shared in the article in a descriptive manner. The results are expected to be a resource for Higher Education Institutions, who are caught unprepared for the emergency distance learning period, in terms of understanding student perception and experience. At the same time, it is aimed to identify vulnerable student groups in distance education and to reveal the socio-economic inequalities affecting students in the distance education process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• distance education
• higher education
• COVID-19
• socio-economic inequalities
• gender

Destekleyen Kurum

Department of the Scientific Research Projects, Abdullah Gul University

Proje Numarası

120K273

Kaynakça

1. Adedoyin, O. B., ve Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180.
2. Adnan, M., ve Anwar, K. (2020). Online Learning amid the Covid-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51. ERIC Document No ED606496.
3. Almosa, A. (2002). Use of Computer in Education, (2nd ed), Riyadh: Future Education Library.
4. Anwar, M., Khan, A., ve Sultan, K. (2020). The Barriers and Challenges Faced by Students in Online Education during Covid-19 Pandemic in Pakistan. Gomal University Journal of Research.
5. Arkorful, V., ve Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.
6. Bacher-Hicks, A., Goodman, J., ve Mulhern, C. (2020). Inequality in household adaptation to schooling shocks: Covid-induced online learning engagement in real time. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104345-104361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104345.
7. Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2). 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191.
8. Barret, E., ve Lally, V. (2002). Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15 (1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.1999.151075.x

9. Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124.
10. Bozkurt, A. ve Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Corona Virus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083.
11. Branch, R. M., ve Dousay, T. A. (2015). Survey of instructional development models (5th Ed.). Association for Educational Communications and Technology. https://aect.org/docs/SurveyofInstructionalDesignModels.pdf?pdf=SurveyofInstructionalDesignModels .
12. Burdman, P. (1998). Cyber U. Anaheim (California) Orange County Register, September 13, sec. 1, p. 9.
13. Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., ve Wissing, G. (2020). A Wake-Up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning. Post digital Science and Education, 2(3), 946-967.
14. Daymont, T., ve Blau, G. (2008). Student performance in online and traditional sections of an undergraduate management course. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(3), 275-294.
15. Dikmen, S., ve Bahçeci, F. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisi sürecinde yükseköğretim kurumlarının uzaktan eğitime yönelik stratejileri: Fırat Üniversitesi örneği. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 7(2), 78-98.
16. Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M. ve Gyles N. (2003). Do Hybrid Flexible Delivery Teaching Methods Improve Accounting Students’ Learning Outcomes. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 12 (4), 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928032000154512.
17. Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., ve Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312-331.
18. Effeh, E. (1991) Determinants of the study patterns of female distance learners: an evaluative survey. Journal of Distance Education, VI(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12446624.
19. Frey, A., Faul, A., ve Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of social work education, 39(3), 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2003.10779148.
20. Jaffe, J.M., Lee, Y., Huang, L., ve Oshagan, H. (2006). Gender identification, interdependence, and pseudonyms in CMC: language patterns in an electronic conference. The Information Society, 15 (4), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128385
21. Galea, S., ve Abdalla, S. M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment, and civil unrest: underlying deep racial and socioeconomic divides. Jama, 324(3), 227-228. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.11132.
22. Gunter, A., Raghuram, P., Breines, M. R., ve Prinsloo, P. (2020). Distance education as socio‐material assemblage: Place, distribution, and aggregation. Population, Space and Place, 26(3), e2320. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2320
23. Hameed, S., Badii, A., ve Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended learning environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems. 25-26.
24. Hardy, B. L., ve Logan, T. D. (2020). Racial economic inequality amid the COVID-19 crisis. The Hamilton Project, Essay, 17, 2020.
25. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., ve Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause review, 27(1), 1-9.
26. Jones, N., Tapia, I. S., Baird, S., Guglielmi, S., Oakley, E., Yadete, W. A., ve Pincock, K. (2021). Intersecting barriers to adolescents’ educational access during COVID-19: exploring the role of gender, disability and poverty. International Journal of Educational Development, 102428.
27. Joshi, O., Chapagain, B., Kharel, G., Poudyal, N. C., Murray, B. D., ve Mehmood, S. R. (2020). Benefits and challenges of online instruction in agriculture and natural resource education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1725896.
28. Karadağ, E., ve Yücel, C. (2020). Yeni tip Korona virüs pandemisi döneminde üniversitelerde uzaktan eğitim: Lisans öğrencileri kapsamında bir değerlendirme çalışması. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 10(2), 181-192.
29. Kirkup, G., ve von Prummer, C. (1990). Support and connectedness: The Needs of women distance education students. International Journal of E-Learning &Distance Education, 5(2): 9-31. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/381/271.
30. Kissler, S. M., Tedijanto, C., Lipsitch, M., ve Grad, Y. (2020). Social distancing strategies for curbing the Covid-19 epidemic. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20041079.
31. Klein, D., ve Ware, M. (2003). E‐learning: New opportunities in continuing professional development. Learned publishing, 16(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103320995078.
32. Kopp, M., Gröblinger, O., ve Adams, S. (2019). Five common assumptions that prevent digital transformation at higher education institutions. INTED2019 Proceedings, 1448–1457.
33. Korkmaz, G., ve Toraman, Ç. (2020). Are we ready for the post-COVID-19 educational practice? An investigation into what educators think as to online learning. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.110.
34. Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.
35. Lunneborg, P. (1994) Developing Countries; Barriers, Benefits and Policies. World Bank. OU Women, Cassell.
36. Mazur, E. (1997) Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
37. Parker, L. (2000). Learning technologies and their impact on science education: Delivering the promise. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 46(3), 9. ERIC Number: EJ649502.
38. Parkhurst, R., Moskal, B. M., Lucena, J., Downey, G. L., Bigley, T., ve Elber, S. (2008). Engineering cultures: Comparing student learning in online and classroom based implementations. The International journal of engineering education, 24(5), 955-964.
39. Polat, R. K. (2012), Digital exclusion in Turkey: A policy perspective, Government information quarterly, 29(4), pp. 589-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.002.
40. Ruzgar, N. S. (2004), Distance education in Turkey, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 5(2), pp. 22-32.
41. Stewart, D. W., and Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. 3rd Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc.
42. Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., ve Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-1938-x.
43. Tang, H., ve Carr-Chellman, A. (2016). Massive Open Online Courses and Educational Equality in China: A Qualitative Inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0901.04. http://aquila.usm.edu/jetde/vol9/iss1/4.
44. Taplin, M., ve Jegede, O. (2001). Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Achievement of Distance Education Students. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510120050307.
45. Toquero, C. M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching amid Covid-19: The turning point. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 185-188.
46. Vlachopoulos, D. (2020). Covid-19: Threat or opportunity for online education, Higher Learning Research Communications, 10(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v10i1.1179.
47. Volery, T., ve Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International journal of educational management, 5(1) 54. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731.
48. Weber, J. M., ve Lennon, R. (2007). Multi-course comparison of traditional versus Web-based course delivery systems. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), n2. ERIC Document No EJ907748.
49. Young, J. R. (1997). Rethinking the Role of the Professor in an Age of High-Tech Tools, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(6). ERIC Document No EJ552453.
50. Yükseköğretim Kurulu (2020). YÖK'ten Üniversitelerdeki Uzaktan Eğitime Yönelik Değerlendirme. https://covid19.yok.gov.tr/sayfalar/haberduyuru/uzaktan-egitime-yonelik-degerlendirme.aspx
51. Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Uzaktan Öğretime İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar, 2. Bölüm, Madde 6, b şıkkı (2020). https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Uzaktan_ogretim/yuksekogretim_kurumlarinda_uzaktan_ogretime_iliskin_usul_ve_esaslar.pdf
52. Zan, N., ve Zan, B. U. (2020). Koronavirüs ile Acil Durumda Eğitim: Türkiye’nin Farklı Bölgelerinden Uzaktan Eğitim Sistemine Dahil Olan Edebiyat Fakültesi Öğrencilerine Genel Bakış. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44365.