Araştırma Makalesi

Acceptance of Digital Learning Tools in Higher Education: A Case Study of Microsoft Teams Application

Cilt: 39 Sayı: 2 15 Nisan 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Acceptance of Digital Learning Tools in Higher Education: A Case Study of Microsoft Teams Application

Abstract

This study explores the adoption of Microsoft Teams within a higher education setting using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. It specifically examines how performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions influence the platform's usage. Data were collected through a survey involving 143 participants and analyzed via structural equation modeling. Findings reveal that performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions significantly impact the intention to use Microsoft Teams, whereas effort expectancy does not. The results underscore that students and educators alike are more likely to adopt Microsoft Teams if it enhances their performance and productivity, if social influences (such as peer and faculty encouragement) are favorable, and if the required technological infrastructure is in place. Effort expectancy’s lack of influence suggests that users may find the platform sufficiently intuitive, thus minimizing the perceived effort required to engage with it. This insight is particularly valuable for institutions focusing on seamless user experiences. Educational institutions planning digital transformations should prioritize performance-enhancing features, support social collaboration, and ensure robust infrastructure to promote successful adoption. By aligning their strategies with user expectations and infrastructure needs, institutions can create a more conducive environment for effective digital learning.

Keywords

Microsoft Teams , Technology Acceptance , Higher Education , UTAUT , Video Conference

Kaynakça

  1. Almodaires, A. A., Almutairi, F. M., & Almsaud, T. E. A. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams for remote learning. International Education Studies, 14(9), 108. [CrossRef]
  2. Alsyouf, A., & Ku Ishak, A. (2018). Understanding EHRs continuance intention to use from the perspectives of UTAUT: Practice environment moderating effect and top management support as predictor variables. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 10(1), 92-175. [CrossRef]
  3. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2012). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: SPSS uygulamalı (7. Baskı). Sakarya Yayıncılık.
  4. Ayaz, A., & Yanartaş, M. (2020). An analysis on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology theory (UTAUT): Acceptance of electronic document management system (EDMS). Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, 100032. [CrossRef]
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [CrossRef]
  7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. [CrossRef]
  8. Gharaibeh, M. K. (2023). Measuring student satisfaction of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform in Jordan: An application of UTAUT2 model. Human Systems Management, 42(2), 159-171. [CrossRef]
  9. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
  10. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. [CrossRef]

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ayaz, A., Demir, F., Bahçekapılı, E., & Kabakuş, A. K. (2025). Acceptance of Digital Learning Tools in Higher Education: A Case Study of Microsoft Teams Application. Trends in Business and Economics, 39(2), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.16951/trendbusecon.1581151