Araştırma Makalesi

Electronic Waste Disposal Behavior: A Qualitative Analysis in the Framework of Behavioral and Technological Factors

Cilt: 39 Sayı: 3 15 Temmuz 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Electronic Waste Disposal Behavior: A Qualitative Analysis in the Framework of Behavioral and Technological Factors

Abstract

Sustainability is one of the most critical issues of our time. Although sustainability is such a popular topic, the concept and methods of sustainable disposal occupy a very limited space in the minds of consumers. When it comes to different waste groups such as electronic waste, consumers may even show a tendency to avoid sustainability-related behavior. This study examines consumers' electronic waste disposal behaviors and the factors that encourage or hinder this process. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 11 participants selected through purposeful sampling were evaluated using the MAXQDA program and the thematic analysis method. The findings show that expectations of economic benefit and accessible recycling infrastructure encourage sustainable disposal, while insecurity, lack of awareness, and inadequate infrastructure act as hindering factors. The study offers suggestions to improve consumer behavior and serves as a guide for policy makers and practitioners. The findings are expected to meaningfully contribute to the development of electronic waste management strategies.

Keywords

Electronic Waste , Sustainable Disposal Behavior , Qualitative Research

Kaynakça

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [CrossRef]
  2. Baldé, C. P., Forti, V., Gray, V., Kuehr, R., & Stegmann, P. (2017). The global e-waste monitor 2017: Quantities, flows and resources. United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA).
  3. Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. De, Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. [CrossRef]
  4. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. Harper Business.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  6. Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2010). The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 824–844. [CrossRef]
  7. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. [CrossRef]
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [CrossRef]
  10. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. [CrossRef]

Kaynak Göster

APA
Özer Çizer, E., & Kırcova, İ. (2025). Electronic Waste Disposal Behavior: A Qualitative Analysis in the Framework of Behavioral and Technological Factors. Trends in Business and Economics, 39(3), 378-395. https://doi.org/10.16951/trendbusecon.1641943