Araştırma Makalesi

The Impact of Carbon Emissions on Firms’ Financial Performance: An Application in BIST Sustainability Index

Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1 26 Ocak 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

The Impact of Carbon Emissions on Firms’ Financial Performance: An Application in BIST Sustainability Index

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the carbon emission data of the firms listed in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index in Turkey and analyze the relationship between carbon emissions and the financial performance of these firms. In this research, annual data for 31 firms listed in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index for the period 2017–2020 were used. The relationship between the financial performance indicators of the firms and their carbon emissions was analyzed using a random effects panel data model. The dependent variables identified were return on assets and return on equity as measures of financial performance, while carbon emissions were consid- ered as the independent variable, along with control variables such as firm size, leverage ratio, firm growth, and firm value. The research findings indicate that carbon emissions have a negative impact on both return on assets and return on equity.

Keywords

BIST Sustainability Index , carbon emission , financial performance , panel data analysis , sustainability reporting

Kaynakça

  1. Apaydın, F. (2009). Kurumsal teori ve işletmelerin kurumsallaşması. CÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 1–22.
  2. Ben Jebli, M., & Ben Youssef, S. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 173–185. [CrossRef]
  3. Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution profitable. Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.
  4. Broadstock, D. C., Collins, A., Hunt, L. C., & Vergos, K. (2018). Voluntary disclosure, greenhouse gas emissions and business performance: Assessing the first decade of reporting. British Accounting Review, 50(1), 48–59. [CrossRef]
  5. Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organ- izations and Society, 26(7–8), 565–596. [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhong, Z. (2019). CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renewable Energy, 131, 208–216. [CrossRef]
  7. Cucchiella, F., Gastaldi, M., & Miliacca, M. (2017). The management of greenhouse gas emissions and its effects on firm performance. Jour- nal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1387–1400. [CrossRef]
  8. Dillard, J. F., Rigsby, J. T., & Goodman, C. (2004). The making and remaking of organization context: Duality and the institutionalization process. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(4), 506–542. [CrossRef]
  9. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Lnstitu- tional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. [CrossRef]
  10. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. [CrossRef]