Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanlarının Sosyal Hizmet Uygulama Öğrencileri ile Saha Uygulamasında Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar

Öz

Sosyal hizmet eğitiminin en önemli ve vazgeçilmez unsurlarından biri de sosyal hizmet uygulamasıdır. Bu nedenle öğrencilerin uygulama sürecinde aktif ve verimli olmasını engelleyen sorunların tespit edilerek çözüm önerileri sunulmasının faydalı olacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının sosyal hizmet uygulama öğrencileriyle yaşadıkları sorunları tespit etmek ve bu sorunlara yönelik çözüm önerileri geliştirmektir. Nitel araştırma desenine göre yapılan bu araştırmaya sosyal hizmet uygulama öğrencilerine kurum danışmanlığı yapmış 140 sosyal hizmet uzmanı katılmıştır. Çalışmada üç ana soru üzerinde odaklanılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre, uygulama sürecinde sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının en çok devamsızlık ve kurallara uymama, açık öğretim programları ile ilgili sorunlar, ilgisizlik ve isteksizlik ve eğitsel danışmanlarla iletişim sorunu yaşadıkları görülmektedir. Bu sorunları çoğunlukla uygulama öğrencileriyle karşılıklı açık iletişim kurarak ve beklentileri belirleyerek, eğitsel danışmanlar ve diğer kurum çalışanlarıyla birlikte hareket ederek, uygulama süreci ve yeri hakkında önceden bilgi vererek çözümledikleri belirlenmiştir. Bu araştırmadan elde edilen bulguların, uygulama sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlarla ilgili farkındalığı arttırarak, daha etkin ve verimli bir uygulama sürecinin nasıl planlanabileceğine ve sosyal hizmet eğitiminin nitelikli olmasına katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• saha uygulaması
• sosyal hizmet öğrencisi
• sosyal hizmet uygulaması
• sosyal hizmet uzmanı

CHALLENGES FACED BY SOCIAL WORKERS IN FIELD PRACTICE WITH SOCIAL WORK STUDENTS

Öz

One of the most important and indispensable elements of social work education is social work practice. For this reason, it would be beneficial to identify the problems that prevent students from being active and productive in the practice period and to offer solutions. This research aims to identify the problems social workers experience with social work students in field practice and develop solutions to these problems. In this study qualitative research design was used to indicate experiences of 140 social workers as institutional supervisors. The study focused on three main open-ended questions. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with social workers. According to the findings, the most relevant problems that social workers encounter with the practice students are absenteeism and non-compliance about institutional rules, problems with open-plan education programmes, indifference and reluctance during the practice period. To prevent these problems, the social workers came up with suggestions, such as academic supervisors monitoring students more frequently, students having learning motivation and being idealistic, developing students’ communication skills. The findings obtained from this research will contribute to planning a more effective and productive practice period and having a qualified social work education through increasing awareness about problems encountered during the practice process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• field practice
• social work practice
• social work students
• social worker

Kaynakça

1. Alptekin, K. (2016). Social work education in Turkey from the beginning to the present and tomorrow. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing (in Turkish).
2. Baser, D. (2018). Reflections of social work students’ KPSS preparation process on social work education: a qualitative research. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 18(41), 359-383 (in Turkish).
3. Baum, N. (2010). Dual role transition among first time pregnant social work student trainees. Social Work Education, 29(7), 718–728.
4. Cha, T., Kuo, E., & Marsh, J. C. (2006). Useful knowledge for social work practice. Social Work & Society, 4(1), 111-121.
5. Dominelli, L., & Hackett, S. (2011). Internationalising social work theory and practice. International Social Work, 55(2), 151–153. DOI: 10.1177/0020872811435075.
6. Dominelli, L., & Hackett, S. (2012). Social work responses to the challenges for practice in the 21st century. International Social Work, 55(4), 449–453. DOI: 10.1177/0020872812440784.
7. Erdogan, S., Nahcivan, N., & Esin, M. N. (2014). Research Process, Practice and Critical in Nursing. İstanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstore (in Turkish).
8. Ergun, M. (2005). Scientific research methods, qualitative research. Retrieved from, http://www. egitim.aku.edu.tr/nitelarastirma.ppt#256,1 (in Turkish).

9. Ferguson, H. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: the possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education, 37(4), 415-427.
10. Geray, H. (2006). Introduction to quantitative and qualitative methods in social research. Ankara: Siyasal Bookstore (in Turkish).
11. Guldali, O. (2014). Dialectic of Social Work: Critical Arguments for Social Work. Society and Social Work, 25(2), 163-175 (in Turkish).
12. Mavili Aktas, A. (2011). Ethical debates such as the development of professionalism. V. Isıkhan, T. Tuncay & E. Erbay (Eds.) In Social Work Education in Turkey in its 50th Anniversary: Problems, Priorities and Goals Proceedings Book, Social Work Symposium 2011, pp. (73-80)
13. Hacettepe University, Social Work Research and Development Association (in Turkish). Pak, M. D., Attepe-Ozden, S. & Icagasıoglu-Coban, A. (2018). “Don’t Make Them Memorize, Make Them Learn!” Effective Social Work Education Trainer’s Features in the Perspectives of Students. Society and Social Work, 29(2), 226-244 (in Turkish).
14. Ping, L., X. (2012). Education a reflective and active social worker: how social work education responds to social problem. China Journal of Social Work, 5(3), 227-283.
15. Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to Social Research Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. (D, Bayrak, H. B. Arslan, Z. Akyüz, Çev.). Ankara: Siyasal Bookstore (in Turkish).
16. Rehn, M., & Kalman, H. (2018). Social work students’ reflections on challenges during field education. Journal of Social Work, 18(4), 451–467. DOI: 10.1177/1468017316654362.
17. Sahin, F. (2005). Factors that prepared the birth of generalist social work. U. Onat (Ed.) In New Approaches in Social Work Education, Social Work Symposium 2002, pp. (102-111) Ankara, Hacettepe University, School of Social Services, Publication No, 17 (in Turkish).
18. Theresa, C., Elizabeth, K., & Jeanne, C. M. (2006). Useful knowledge for social work practice. Social Work & Society, 4(1), 111-121.
19. Tanga, P., T. (2013). The challenges of social work field training in Lesotho. Social Work Education, 32(2) 157-178, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2012.741578
20. Tippa, N. G., & Mane, S. R. (2018). Problems and prospects of field work training in social work education: A review. Innovare Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 1-2.
21. Unbehaun, H. (2005). Social work education in Germany: Models-perspectives-examples. U. Onat (Ed.) In New Approaches in Social Work Education, Social Work Symposium 2002, pp. (45- 52) Ankara, Hacettepe University, School of Social Services, Publication No, 17 (in Turkish).
22. Walker, J., & Gant, V. (2021). Social work students sharing practice learning experiences: Critical reflection as process and method, Practice, DOI: 10.1080/09503153.2021.1902973
23. Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327-339, DOI: 10.5175/ JSWE.2010.200900043
24. Weitzman, T., & Beder, J. (2000). The fieldwork needs of graduate social work students in an oncology placement: survey research. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 18(1), 1–15, DOI: 10.1300/J077v18n01_01.
25. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara, Seckin Publishing, 9th Edition (in Turkish).