Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SURVIVAL RESULTS OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE AND ADVANCED-STAGE ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4, 139 - 144, 22.05.2018

Öz

Purpose: To evaluate the overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with advanced-stage(FIGO III-IV) and high-grade endometrium

cancer

Patients and Methods: Patients with operated due to endometrial cancer between 2003-2014 and detected FIGO-stage III-IV serous, clearcell,

carcinosarcoma, mixed, grade 3 endometrioid, and undifferentiated histological types according to postoperative pathology report

were selected for the study. Overall survival and disease-free survival times were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for each histologic

type.

Results: A total of 85 patients with a median-age of 65(37-86) were included in the study. Of them, 56(65.9%) were stage-III and 29(34.1%)

were stage-IV. The most common histological-type was carcinosarcoma(25.9%, n=22) followed by mixed(22.4%,n=19), serous(17.6%,n=18),

grade 3 endometrioid(17.6% cell (8.2%,n=7) and undifferentiated(4.7%,n=4). During a mean follow-up of 37.1 months(1-148), 63 patients(

74.1%) had recurrence and 60 patients(70.6%) died. The overall survival rate was 29.4%. The highest survival rates were mixed type and

grade 3 endometrioid types(42.1% and 40%) followed by serous(33.3%) and clear-cell(28.6%) and carcinosarcoma(13.6%) and no survival in

undifferentiated type. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 24 and 49 months for serous type, 28 and 34 months for grade

3 endometrioid type, 15 and 27 months for mixed type, 9 and 18 months for clear cell, 10 and 21 months for carcinosarcoma, 3 and 4 months

for the undifferentiated type

Conclusion: The median disease-free and overall survival of patients were 12 and 28 months, respectively, according to the data of this

study. 74.1% of the patients relapse. The worst prognosis is with undifferentiated types. The prognosis for Grade-3 endometrioid and

mixedtypes seems to be relatively better.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Gottwald L, Pluta P, Piekarski J, Spych M, Hendzel K, Topczewska-Tylinska K, et al. Long-term survival of endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Arch Med Sci. 2010;6(6):937–44.
  • 2. Reynaers EAEM, Ezendam NPM, Pijnenborg JMA. Comparable outcome between endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors in patients with early-stage highgrade endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(6):790– 4.
  • 3. Oliva E, Soslow RA. High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas. Vol. 4, Surgical Pathology Clinics. 2011. p. 199–241.
  • 4. Soslow RA. High-grade endometrial carcinomas - strategies for typing. Vol. 62, Histopathology. 2013. p. 89–110.
  • 5. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2005;366(9484):491–505.
  • 6. Sorosky JI. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 Pt 1):383–97.
  • 7. Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. In: The Lancet. 2016. p. 1094–108.
  • 8. Lee NK. Adjuvant treatment of advanced-stage endometrial cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(2):256–65.
  • 9. Tangjitgamol S, See HT, Kavanagh J. Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(5):885–95.
  • 10. Cantrell LA, Blank S V., Duska LR. Uterine carcinosarcoma: A review of the literature. Vol. 137, Gynecologic Oncology. 2015. p. 581–8.
  • 11. Ferguson SE, Tornos C, Hummer A, Barakat RR, Soslow RA. Prognostic features of surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(11):1653–61.
  • 12. Gokce ZK, Turan T, Karalok A, Tasci T, Ureyen I, Ozkaya E, et al. Clinical outcomes of uterine carcinosarcoma: results of 94 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(2):279– 87.
  • 13. Vaidya AP, Horowitz NS, Oliva E, Halpern EF, Duska LR. Uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumors should not be included in studies of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(2):684–7.
  • 14. Roelofsen T, van Ham MAPC, Wiersma van Tilburg JM, Zomer SF, Bol M, Massuger LFAG, et al. Pure Compared With Mixed Serous Endometrial Carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1371–81.
  • 15. Espinosa I, D’Angelo E, Palacios J, Prat J. Mixed and ambiguous endometrial carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(7):972–81.
  • 16. Moore KN, Fader AN. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(2):278–91.
  • 17. Ayeni TA, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Mariani A, McGree ME, Weaver AL, Haddock MG, et al. Comparative outcomes assessment of uterine grade 3 endometrioid, serous, and clear cell carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(3):478– 85.
  • 18. Felix AS, Stone RA, Bowser R, Chivukula M, Edwards RP, Weissfeld JL, et al. Comparison of survival outcomes between patients with malignant mixed mullerian tumors and high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, and papillary serous endometrial cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(5):877–84.
  • 19. Hamilton C, Cheung M, Osann K, Chen L, Teng N, Longacre T, et al. Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(5):642–6.
  • 20. Greggi S, Mangili G, Scaffa C, Scala F, Losito S, Iodice F, et al. Uterine papillary serous, clear cell, and poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinomas: a comparative study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(4):661–7.
  • 21. Alkushi A, Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Gilks CB. High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: Serous and Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Have Different Immunophenotypes and Outcomes. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(4):343–50.

İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4, 139 - 144, 22.05.2018

Öz

Öz


Amaç: İleri evre (FIGO III-IV) yüksek gradeli endometrium kanserli hastaların genel sağkalım ve hastalıksız sağkalımlarını değerlendirmek

Metod: 2003-2014 yılları arasında endometrial kanser nedeniyle opere edilen ve patoloji raporuna göre evre III-IV seröz, berrak hücreli,

karsinosarkom, mikst(endometrioid+no-endometrioid), grade 3 endometrioid ve undiferansiye histolojik tiplere sahip hastalar çalışma için

seçildi. Herbir histolojik tip için Kaplan-Meier sağkalım analizi ile genel sağkalım ve hastalıksız sağkalım süreleri hesaplandı. 


Bulgular: Çalışmaya medyan yaşı 65 (37-86) olan toplam 85 hasta alındı. 56 hasta (%65.9) evre III, 29 hasta (%34.1) evre IV idi. En sık görülen

histolojik tip karsinosarkom (%25.9;n=22), ardından sırayla mixed (%22.4; n=19), serous (%17.6;n=18), grade 3 endometrioid (%17.6;n=15),

berrak hücreli (%8.2;n=7) ve undiferansiye (%4.7; n=4) idi. Ortalama 37.1 aylık (1-148) bir takip süresi boyunca 63 hastada (%74.1) nüks görülmüş,

60 hasta (%70.6) ölmüştü. Genel sağkalım oranı %29.4 idi. En yüksek sağkalım oranları mikst tip ve grade 3 endometrioid tipte (42.1% ve %40)

görüldü, ardından sırayla seröz (%33.3) ve berrak hücreli (%28.6) ve karsinosarkomda (%13.6) idi, undiferansiye tipte sağkalım yoktu (% 0.0). Kaplan-Meier

sağkalım analizine göre, median hastalıksız sağkalım ve genel sağkalım süreleri seröz tip için 24 ve 49 ay, grade 3 endometrioid tip için 28 ve 34 ay, mikst tip

için 15 ve 27 ay, karsinosarkom için 10 ve 21 ay, berrak hücreli için 9 ve 18 ay, undiferansiye tip için 3 ve 4 ay hesaplandı.


Sonuç: İleri evrede tespit edilmiş yüksek gradeli endometrial kanserli hastaların medyan hastalıksız ve genel sağkalım süreleri, bu çalışmanın

verilerine göre 12 ve 28 aydır. Hastaların % 74.1’i nüksetmektedir. En kötü prognoz undiferansiye tiplerdedir. Grade3 endometrioid ve

mikst tiplerde prognoz nispeten daha iyi görünmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Gottwald L, Pluta P, Piekarski J, Spych M, Hendzel K, Topczewska-Tylinska K, et al. Long-term survival of endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Arch Med Sci. 2010;6(6):937–44.
  • 2. Reynaers EAEM, Ezendam NPM, Pijnenborg JMA. Comparable outcome between endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors in patients with early-stage highgrade endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(6):790– 4.
  • 3. Oliva E, Soslow RA. High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas. Vol. 4, Surgical Pathology Clinics. 2011. p. 199–241.
  • 4. Soslow RA. High-grade endometrial carcinomas - strategies for typing. Vol. 62, Histopathology. 2013. p. 89–110.
  • 5. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2005;366(9484):491–505.
  • 6. Sorosky JI. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 Pt 1):383–97.
  • 7. Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. In: The Lancet. 2016. p. 1094–108.
  • 8. Lee NK. Adjuvant treatment of advanced-stage endometrial cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(2):256–65.
  • 9. Tangjitgamol S, See HT, Kavanagh J. Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(5):885–95.
  • 10. Cantrell LA, Blank S V., Duska LR. Uterine carcinosarcoma: A review of the literature. Vol. 137, Gynecologic Oncology. 2015. p. 581–8.
  • 11. Ferguson SE, Tornos C, Hummer A, Barakat RR, Soslow RA. Prognostic features of surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(11):1653–61.
  • 12. Gokce ZK, Turan T, Karalok A, Tasci T, Ureyen I, Ozkaya E, et al. Clinical outcomes of uterine carcinosarcoma: results of 94 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(2):279– 87.
  • 13. Vaidya AP, Horowitz NS, Oliva E, Halpern EF, Duska LR. Uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumors should not be included in studies of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(2):684–7.
  • 14. Roelofsen T, van Ham MAPC, Wiersma van Tilburg JM, Zomer SF, Bol M, Massuger LFAG, et al. Pure Compared With Mixed Serous Endometrial Carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1371–81.
  • 15. Espinosa I, D’Angelo E, Palacios J, Prat J. Mixed and ambiguous endometrial carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(7):972–81.
  • 16. Moore KN, Fader AN. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(2):278–91.
  • 17. Ayeni TA, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Mariani A, McGree ME, Weaver AL, Haddock MG, et al. Comparative outcomes assessment of uterine grade 3 endometrioid, serous, and clear cell carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(3):478– 85.
  • 18. Felix AS, Stone RA, Bowser R, Chivukula M, Edwards RP, Weissfeld JL, et al. Comparison of survival outcomes between patients with malignant mixed mullerian tumors and high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, and papillary serous endometrial cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(5):877–84.
  • 19. Hamilton C, Cheung M, Osann K, Chen L, Teng N, Longacre T, et al. Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(5):642–6.
  • 20. Greggi S, Mangili G, Scaffa C, Scala F, Losito S, Iodice F, et al. Uterine papillary serous, clear cell, and poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinomas: a comparative study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(4):661–7.
  • 21. Alkushi A, Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Gilks CB. High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: Serous and Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Have Different Immunophenotypes and Outcomes. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(4):343–50.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Cerrahi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Alpaslan Kaban

Samet Topuz

Hamdullah Sözen Bu kişi benim

Yavuz Salihoglu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 22 Mayıs 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 5 Ekim 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Kaban, A., Topuz, S., Sözen, H., Salihoglu, Y. (2018). İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi, 19(4), 139-144.
AMA Kaban A, Topuz S, Sözen H, Salihoglu Y. İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI. TRSGO Dergisi. Mayıs 2018;19(4):139-144.
Chicago Kaban, Alpaslan, Samet Topuz, Hamdullah Sözen, ve Yavuz Salihoglu. “İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI”. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 19, sy. 4 (Mayıs 2018): 139-44.
EndNote Kaban A, Topuz S, Sözen H, Salihoglu Y (01 Mayıs 2018) İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 19 4 139–144.
IEEE A. Kaban, S. Topuz, H. Sözen, ve Y. Salihoglu, “İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI”, TRSGO Dergisi, c. 19, sy. 4, ss. 139–144, 2018.
ISNAD Kaban, Alpaslan vd. “İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI”. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 19/4 (Mayıs 2018), 139-144.
JAMA Kaban A, Topuz S, Sözen H, Salihoglu Y. İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI. TRSGO Dergisi. 2018;19:139–144.
MLA Kaban, Alpaslan vd. “İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI”. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi, c. 19, sy. 4, 2018, ss. 139-44.
Vancouver Kaban A, Topuz S, Sözen H, Salihoglu Y. İLERİ EVRE YÜKSEK GRADE ENDOMETRİUM KANSERLİ HASTALARDA SAĞKALIM SONUÇLARI. TRSGO Dergisi. 2018;19(4):139-44.