Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 1 - 5, 06.12.2019

Öz

Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket

 

ÖZET

 

Amaç:Jinekolojik onkoloji cerrahisi yandal eğitim sürecinde en sık hangi konularda eksiklik olduğunu tespit etmek.

Materyal ve metod:Dokuz farklı şehirden ve 13 farklı merkezden toplam 36 jinekolojik onkoloji cerrahisi yandal asistanının (jinekolojik onkoloji yandal asistanlarının %52.1’i) katıldığı 10 soruluk mini anket sonuçları sıklık oranlarına göre değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular:Minimal invaziv jinekolojik onkoloji prosedürlerin yeterince yapılmaması (%61.1) tespit edilmiş olan en sık eksikliktir.

Sonuç:Minimal invaziv cerrahi eğitimi jinekolojik onkoloji cerrahisi yandal eğitim sürecinde temel cerrahi eğitimin bir parçası olarak yer almalıdır.

 

Anahtar kelimeler:jinekolojik onkoloji, yandal, eğitim, minimal invaziv, laparoskopi

 

Gynecologic oncology fellowship education process and basic deficiencies, mini questionnaire

 

ABSTRACT

 

Aim: To identify the most common deficiencies that were noticed during gynecologic oncology fellowship education.

Materials and methods: Totally 36 gynecologic oncology fellows (52.1% of gynecologic oncology fellows) from nine different cities and 13 different clinics answered a total of 10 questions and the results were categorized due to frequencies.

Results: Lack of performing minimally invasive procedures (61.1%) was the most common deficiency of gynecologic oncology fellowship education.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery education must be a part of basic surgical education during gynecologic oncology fellowship period.

 

Key words:gynecologic oncology, fellowship, education, minimally invasive, laparoscopy


References


1. Averette HE, Wrennick A, Angioli R. History of gynecologic oncology subspecialty. Surg Clin North Am 2001;81(4):747-51.

2. Templeton A. Subspecialty training and academic careers. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1999;13(3):423-34.

3. Hoffman MS, Bodurka DC. Surgical education and training program development for gynecologic oncology: American perspective. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114(2 Suppl):S47-51.

4. Tuncer HA, Ozgul N, Kuscu E, et al. Evaluation of a New Oncogynecologic Training Program. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26(7):1333-7.

5. Vernooij F, Heintz P, Witteveen E, et al. The outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment are better when provided by gynecologic oncologists and in specialized hospitals: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105(3):801-12.

6. Vernooij F, Heintz AP, Coebergh JW, et al. Specialized and high-volume care leads to better outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112(3):455-61.

7. Dahm-Kahler P, Palmqvist C, Staf C, et al. Centralized primary care of advanced ovarian cancer improves complete cytoreduction and survival - A population-based cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142(2):211-6.

8. Manchanda R, Godfrey M, Wong-Taylor LA, et al. The need for accredited training in gynaecological oncology: a report from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO). Ann Oncol 2013;24(4):944-52.

9. Gershenson DM. Mentoring in gynecologic oncology fellowship training and beyond. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125(1):1-2.

10. Rabinovich A. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27(4):302-7.

11. Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Greer M, et al. Laparoscopy training in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(2):197-201.

12. Miao J, Fleury AC, Kushnir CL, et al. Post fellowship training in "new-to-them" surgical techniques: assessment of learning curve characteristics. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121(3):620-4.

13. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(32):5331-6.

14. McVey Ruaidhri M. LM, Giede Christopher, Grantcharov Teodor P., and Covens Allan. Introduction of a Structured Assessment of Clinical Competency for Fellows in Gynecologic Oncology: A Pilot Study. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 2015;31(1):17-21.

15. McVey RM, Clarke E, Segev Y, et al. Determining the role of a national objective assessment of surgical skills in gynecological oncology: an e-Delphi methodology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24(6):1098-104.

16. Kesterson JP, Szender, J.B., Schaefer, E. et al. Evaluation of Association Between Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Length and a Career in Academic Medicine. J Canc Educ 2016.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Averette HE, Wrennick A, Angioli R. History of gynecologic oncology subspecialty. Surg Clin North Am 2001;81(4):747-51.2. Templeton A. Subspecialty training and academic careers. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1999;13(3):423-34.3. Hoffman MS, Bodurka DC. Surgical education and training program development for gynecologic oncology: American perspective. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114(2 Suppl):S47-51.4. Tuncer HA, Ozgul N, Kuscu E, et al. Evaluation of a New Oncogynecologic Training Program. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26(7):1333-7.5. Vernooij F, Heintz P, Witteveen E, et al. The outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment are better when provided by gynecologic oncologists and in specialized hospitals: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105(3):801-12.6. Vernooij F, Heintz AP, Coebergh JW, et al. Specialized and high-volume care leads to better outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112(3):455-61.7. Dahm-Kahler P, Palmqvist C, Staf C, et al. Centralized primary care of advanced ovarian cancer improves complete cytoreduction and survival - A population-based cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142(2):211-6.8. Manchanda R, Godfrey M, Wong-Taylor LA, et al. The need for accredited training in gynaecological oncology: a report from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO). Ann Oncol 2013;24(4):944-52.9. Gershenson DM. Mentoring in gynecologic oncology fellowship training and beyond. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125(1):1-2.10. Rabinovich A. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27(4):302-7.11. Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Greer M, et al. Laparoscopy training in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(2):197-201.12. Miao J, Fleury AC, Kushnir CL, et al. Post fellowship training in "new-to-them" surgical techniques: assessment of learning curve characteristics. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121(3):620-4.13. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(32):5331-6.14. McVey Ruaidhri M. LM, Giede Christopher, Grantcharov Teodor P., and Covens Allan. Introduction of a Structured Assessment of Clinical Competency for Fellows in Gynecologic Oncology: A Pilot Study. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 2015;31(1):17-21.15. McVey RM, Clarke E, Segev Y, et al. Determining the role of a national objective assessment of surgical skills in gynecological oncology: an e-Delphi methodology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24(6):1098-104.16. Kesterson JP, Szender, J.B., Schaefer, E. et al. Evaluation of Association Between Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Length and a Career in Academic Medicine. J Canc Educ 2016.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Cerrahi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

İlker Selcuk 0000-0003-0499-5722

Hanifi Sahin

Ali Ayhan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 6 Aralık 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Selcuk, İ., Sahin, H., & Ayhan, A. (2019). Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi, 21(1), 1-5.
AMA Selcuk İ, Sahin H, Ayhan A. Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket. TRSGO Dergisi. Aralık 2019;21(1):1-5.
Chicago Selcuk, İlker, Hanifi Sahin, ve Ali Ayhan. “Jinekolojik Onkoloji Yandal eğitim süreci Ve Temel Eksiklikleri, Mini Anket”. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 21, sy. 1 (Aralık 2019): 1-5.
EndNote Selcuk İ, Sahin H, Ayhan A (01 Aralık 2019) Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 21 1 1–5.
IEEE İ. Selcuk, H. Sahin, ve A. Ayhan, “Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket”, TRSGO Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 1, ss. 1–5, 2019.
ISNAD Selcuk, İlker vd. “Jinekolojik Onkoloji Yandal eğitim süreci Ve Temel Eksiklikleri, Mini Anket”. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 21/1 (Aralık 2019), 1-5.
JAMA Selcuk İ, Sahin H, Ayhan A. Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket. TRSGO Dergisi. 2019;21:1–5.
MLA Selcuk, İlker vd. “Jinekolojik Onkoloji Yandal eğitim süreci Ve Temel Eksiklikleri, Mini Anket”. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 1-5.
Vancouver Selcuk İ, Sahin H, Ayhan A. Jinekolojik onkoloji yandal eğitim süreci ve temel eksiklikleri, mini anket. TRSGO Dergisi. 2019;21(1):1-5.