Öğretmenlerin İşitme Engelli Öğrencilerin Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Eğitimine Erişimine İlişkin Görüşleri

Öz

Türkiye'de, örgün eğitime devam eden işitme engelli öğrenciler genellikle işiten öğrencilerin öğrendiği gibi İngilizce öğrenememektedir. Bu çalışma, nitel bir yaklaşım bağlamında yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeleri kullanarak dokuz işitme engelli öğrenci öğretmeninin Türkiye'deki işitme engelli öğrencilerin yabancı dil olarak İngilizce eğitimine erişimine ilişkin bakış açılarını analiz etmektedir. Çalışmada veriler içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, Türkiye'deki engelli bireylerin sağırlığı bir kültür olarak algıladıklarını, Türk İşaret Dili'ni sağır bireylerin birincil dili olarak gördüklerini ve sağır eğitiminde işaret dilinin bir araç olarak kullanılmasını desteklediklerini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, işitme engelliler öğretmenleri, işitme engelli öğrenciler için yabancı dil olarak İngilizce eğitimini Türk İşaret Dili'ni tam olarak öğrenilene kadar ertelemeyi tercih etmektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları, Türk İşaret Dili'nin örgün eğitime devam eden öğrencilerin eğitimine bir araç olarak entegre edilmesini ve herhangi bir dil öğrenmeyi ertelemeden sağır öğrencilere eşzamanlı olarak yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğretmek için eğitim programları tasarlamayı önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yabancı dil olarak İngilizce
• sağır öğrenciler
• sağır öğrencilerin öğretmenleri
• bir kültür olarak sağırlık
• örgün eğitime devam eden sağır öğrenciler

Perspectives of Turkish Teachers on Deaf Students’ Access to English as a Foreign Language Education

Öz

In Türkiye, K-12 Deaf students often do not learn English as hearing students learn. This paper applies a qualitative approach and uses semi-structured interviews as the data source to analyze the perspectives of nine teachers of Deaf students on Deaf students' access to English as a foreign language education in Türkiye. In analysis, the study applies content analysis and considers Bourdieu's forms of capital, the theory of figured world, and social model of disability as the theoretical framework. The findings show that teachers of Deaf students in Türkiye have an ideology of Deafness as a culture, view Turkish Sign Language as the primary language of Deaf individuals, and support using sign language as a medium in Deaf education. However, teachers of Deaf students prefer postponing English as a foreign language education for Deaf students until Turkish Sign Language is fully acquired. The findings of the study suggest integrating Turkish Sign Language in K-12 Deaf education as a medium and designing education programs to teach English as a foreign language to Deaf students simultaneously without postponing learning any languages.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• English as a foreign language
• Deaf students
• teachers of Deaf students
• Deafness as a culture
• k-12 Deaf students.

Kaynakça

1. Akmese, P., P. & Kayhan, N. (2016). İşitme engelliler öğretmenleri ile odyoloji ve konuşma bozuklukları uzmanlarının işitme kayıplı çocukların eğitimi hakkındaki görüşleri, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(40). https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.45205
2. Babaci-Wilhite, Z. (2015). Local languages as a human right in education: Comparative cases from Africa. Sense.
3. Bedoin, D. (2011). English teachers of deaf and hard‐of‐hearing students in French schools: Needs, barriers, and strategies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.563605
4. Birinci, F. G. (2014). The effectiveness of visual materials in teaching vocabulary to deaf students of EFL (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
5. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
7. Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1439-1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6
8. Cankuvvet, N., Doğan, M., & Gürgür, H. (2015). Ebeveynlerin koklear implanta ilişkin beklentilerinin incelenmesi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.3c1s3m

9. Cannon, J. E., & Guardino, C. (2012). Literacy strategies for deaf/hard of hearing English language learners: Where do we begin? Deafness and Education International, 14(2), 78-99. https://doi.org/10.1179/1557069X12Y.0000000006
10. Cannon, J. E., & Luckner, J. L. (2016). Increasing cultural and linguistic diversity in Deaf education teacher preparation programs. American Annals of the Deaf, 161(1), 89-103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26235253
11. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
12. Constitution of the Republic of Türkiye (1982). https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf
13. Coupland, N. (2013). Introduction: Sociolinguistics in the global era. In N. Coupland (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics and globalization (pp. 1-27). Wiley Blackwell.
14. Council of Europe (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-referencelanguages
15. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (5th ed.). Sage.
16. Csizer, K. & Kontra, E. H. (2020). Foreign language characteristics of deaf and severely hard of hearing students. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1). 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12630
17. Dorn, B. (2019). The changing role of teachers of students who are deaf or hard of hearing: Consultation as an increasing part of the job. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 29(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2018.1502087
18. Engler, K. S., & MacGregor, C. J. (2018). Deaf education teacher preparation: A phenomenological case study of a graduate program with a comprehensive philosophy. American Annals of the Deaf, 162(5), 388–418. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26382401
19. European Commission/Eurydice. (2017). Teaching languages at school in Europe (2017 ed.) European Journal of Language Policy, 9(2), 252-261. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/677227
20. Carrie, G. L., Gobble, M. E., & Cawthon, S. W. A. (2012). National perspective on teachers’ efficacy beliefs in deaf education, The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens014
21. Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit (2nd Ed.). Routledge
22. Gürgür, H., Girgin, U. & Uzuner, Y. (2012). İşitme engelli bir öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilen bire bir söyleşilerde öğretmen yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi, Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(3),507-539. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/256180
23. Heugh, K. (2014). Margins, diversity, and achievement: System-wide data and implementation of multilingual education in Ethiopia. In D. Gorter, V. Zenotz & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Minority languages and multilingual education (pp. 45-63). Springer.
24. Holland D., Lachicotte W. Jr., Skinner D., & Cain C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural Worlds. Harvard University Press.
25. Ilkbasaran, D. (2015). Literacies, mobilities and agencies of deaf youth in Turkey: Constraints and opportunities in the 21st century (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest. (1656169535).
26. Johnson, J., R. & McIntosh, A., S. (2009). Toward a cultural perspective and understanding of the disability and deaf experience in special and multicultural education, Remedial and Special Education, 30(2), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324405
27. Johnson, H. A. (2013). Initial and ongoing teacher preparation and support: Current problems and possible solutions. American Annals of the Deaf, 157(5), 439–449. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26234859
28. Karasu, H., P. (2014). Individual literacy activities with hearing-impaired children in the preschool period. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(22), 1239-1249. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1851
29. Kelly, R., Dufva, H., & Tapio, E. (2015). Many languages, many modalities: Finnish Sign Language signers as learners of English. AFinLAn Vuosikirja–AFinLA Yearbook, 73, 113-125. https://journal.fi/afinlavk/article/view/49371
30. Kontra, E. H., Csizér, K., & Piniel, K. (2015). The challenge for deaf and hard-of-hearing students to learn foreign languages in special needs schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.986905
31. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
32. Kuzeci, D. (2015). Choice of foreign language and politics of foreign languages, Journal of Kazim Karabekir Education Faculty, 30, 13-26. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article file/31610
33. Kuzu, A., Odabasi, H., F., Girgin, M., C., (2011). Use of mobile technologies to support students with the hearing impairment: A case from Turkey. Education Technology Theory and Practice, 1(2), 52-82. https://wikieducator.org/images/d/d2/PID_395.pdf
34. Kuzu, D. (2016). The politics of identity, recognition, and multiculturalism: The Kurds in Turkey. Nations and Nationalism, 22(1), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12139
35. Luckner, L., J. & Dorn, B. (2017). Job satisfaction of teachers of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22(3), 336-345. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx016
36. McDermid, C. (2020). Educational interpreters, Deaf students and inclusive education? Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice, 2 (1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.37233/TRSPED.2020.0107
37. Musyoka M.M. (2023). Translanguaging in bilingual deaf education teacher preparation programs. Languages, 8(65), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010065
38. Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305 Palma, J., & Steyer, E. (2013). Insights into teaching English as a foreign language to deaf students. Lingua Americana, 17(32), 33-46. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9ecc/c3b1b6e8f076d1fceefbfac4744a19a1a43c.pdf
39. Polat, F. (2003). Factors affecting psychosocial adjustment of deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1093/Deafed/eng018
40. Potier, K.R., & Givens, H. (2023). Synthesizing Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and deaf pedagogy framework toward deaf education reform: Perspectives from teachers of the Deaf. American Annals of the Deaf 168(1), 102-127. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2023.a904169.
41. QSR International Pty Ltd. (2015) NVivo (Version 11), http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
42. Quay, S. (2005). Education reforms and English teaching for the deaf in Japan. Deafness and Education International, 7(3), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1179/146431505790560338
43. Republic of Turkey Fundamental Law of National Education (1973). http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.1739.pdf
44. Sarıkaya, E. (2011). The opinions and suggestions of teachers of hearing-impaired children about literacy learning of hearing-impaired children. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
45. Selvi, H. H. & Yıldırım, S. B. (2023). Türkiye’de işaret dili eğitimine yönelik güncel sorunlar. Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice, 5 (1), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.37233/TRSPED.2023.0137
46. Shakespeare, T. (2005). Disability studies today and tomorrow. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(1), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00435.x
47. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2012). Indigenousness, human rights, ethnicity, language, and power. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 213, 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0008.
48. Turan, Z. (2010). An early natural auditory-oral intervention approach for children with hearing loss: A qualitative study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1731-1756.
49. Turkish Statistical Institute (2018). The proportion of disabled population by type of disability. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1017
50. Turkish Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Special Education and Counseling Services (2018). Regulations of Special Education Services https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/07/20180707-8.htm
51. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1996). Universal Declaration on Linguistic Rights.
52. Urrieta, L. (2007). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to special issue, The Urban Review, 39(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0051-0
53. Wee, L. (2007). Linguistic human rights and mobility. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(4), 325-338. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ884573
54. Wilson, A. T., & Winiarczyk, R. E. (2014). Mixed methods research strategies with deaf people linguistic and cultural challenges addressed. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527943
55. Zeshan, U. (2003). Aspects of Turkish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics, 6(1), 43-75. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.6.1.04zes