Afet Haberciliği: Kahramanmaraş Merkezli Depremler Sürecinde Sosyal Medyaya Yönelik Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Geleneksel ve yeni medyada yer bulan bir uzman gazetecilik alanı olarak afet haberciliği, deprem, sel, yangın, kasırga gibi doğa olaylarını kapsamaktadır. Afet dönemlerinde merkezi bir rol üstlenen afet haberciliğinin birçok farklı işlevi bulunmaktadır. Afet haberciliğinin işlevleri, sosyal medyanın sahip olduğu özellikler ve işlevlerle desteklenebilmektedir. Afet haberciliği ve sosyal medya arasındaki ilişkiyi konu edinen bu çalışmada, sosyal medyanın afet haberciliği için taşıdığı olumlu boyutları ortaya koymak amaçlanmaktadır. Nitel araştırma örneklerinden biri olan bu çalışmada Twitter’a odaklanılmıştır ve 1451 tweet, netnografi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, deprem ve/veya depremler kavramının alternatifi olarak “felaket” tanımlaması ön plana çıkmaktadır. Depremler, tweetlerde “siyaset ve din” alanlarıyla ilişkilendirilerek ele alınmıştır. Diğer yandan tweetlerde “bilgilendirme ve toplumsal hafıza” işlevlerinin belirginleştiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afet gazeteciliği
• sosyal medya
• Twitter
• Kahramanmaraş depremleri
• netnografi

Disaster Journalism: An Evaluation of Social Media in the Process of Kahramanmaraş Centered Earthquakes

Öz

As a field of specialized journalism that finds place in traditional and new media, disaster journalism covers natural phenomena such as earthquakes, floods, fires and hurricanes. Disaster journalism, which plays a central role in times of disaster, has many different functions. The functions of disaster journalism can be supported by the features and functions that social media has. In this study, which deals with the relationship between disaster journalism and social media, it is aimed to reveal the positive dimensions of social media for disaster journalism. In this study, which is one of the qualitative research examples, Twitter was focused and 1451 tweets were analyzed by netnography method. According to the findings obtained, the definition of “disaster” comes to the fore as an alternative to the concept of earthquake and/or earthquakes. Earthquakes have been addressed in tweets by associating them with the fields of “politics and religion”. On the other hand, it has been determined that “information and collective memory” functions have become evident in tweets.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disaster journalism
• social media
• Twitter
• Kahramanmaraş earthquakes
• netnography

Kaynakça

1. Banerjee, S., Mukherjee, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Pakray, P. (2023). An extract-then-abstract based method to generate disaster-news headlines using a DNN extractor followed by a transformer abstractor. Information Processing & Management, 60(3). doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103291.
2. Belz, F. M., & Baumbach, W. (2010). Netnography as a method of lead user identification. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 304-313. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-8691.2010.00571.x.
3. Bowler, G. M. (2010). Netnography: A method specifically designed to study cultures and communities online. The Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1270-1275.
4. Burns, A., & Eltham, B. (2010). ‘Catastrophic failure’ theories and disaster journalism: Evaluating media explanations of the black saturday bushfires. Media International Australia, 137(1), 90 99.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1013700111
5. Costello, L., McDermott, M. L., & Wallace, R. (2017). Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-12. doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647.
6. Domala, J., Dogra, M., Masrani, V., Fernandes, D., D’souza, K., Fernandes, D., & Carvalho, T. (2020). Automated identification of disaster news for crisis management using machine learning and natural language processing. In 2020 International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems, 503-508. doi.org.10.1109/ICESC48915.2020.9156031.
7. Downman, S. (2013). Reporting disasters from inside a repressive regime: A citizen journalism case study of the 2008 Cyclone Nargis disaster. Australian Journal of Communication, 40(1), 153-172.
8. Duğan, Ö., & Akıncı, S. (2019). Gazetecilerin kriz dönemlerinde halkla ilişkiler çalışanlarına bakış açılarının belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Galatasaray University Journal of Communication, (30), 167-192. doi.org/10.16878/ gsuilet.459093.

9. Eldem Anar, Ü. İ. (2021). Sosyal medya ortamında yer alan afet haberlerinde etkileşim: İzmir depremi örneği. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 11(3), 1129-1147. doi.org/10.7456/11103100/022.
10. Farinosi, M., & Treré, E. (2014). Challenging mainstream media, documenting real life and sharing with the community: An analysis of the motivations for producing citizen journalism in a post-disaster city. Global Media and Communication, 10(1), 73-92. doi.org/10.1177/1742766513513192.
11. Frances Perreault, M. (2021). Journalism beyond the command post: Local journalists as strategic citizen stakeholders in natural disaster recovery. Journalism Studies, 22(10), 1279-1297. doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1950565.
12. Haddow, G. D., & Haddow, K. S. (2009). Disaster Communications İn A Changing World, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford Publications. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 12-407868-0.00007-0.
13. Houston, J. B., Pfefferbaum, B., & Rosenholtz, C. E. (2012). Disaster news: Framing and frame changing in coverage of major US natural disasters, 2000–2010. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(4), 606-623. doi. org/10.1177/1077699012456022.
14. Houston, J. B., Schraedley, M. K., Worley, M. E., Reed, K., & Saidi, J. (2019). Disaster journalism: Fostering citizen and community disaster mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, and resilience across the disaster cycle. Disasters, 43(3), 591-611. doi.org/10.1111/disa.12352.
15. Kitagawa, T., Ohki, T., Koizumi, Y., Kawabe, Y., Hasegawa, T., Nishigaki, M. (2022). Deterrence- based trust: A study on İmproving the credibility of social media messages in disaster using registered volunteers. In L. Barolli, H.C. Chen & T. Enokido (Eds.), Advances in Networked-Based Information Systems (pp. 188-201). Springer Publications. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84913-9_17.
16. Koç Akgül, S. (2017). Olağanüstü Durumlar, iletişim ve habercilik yaklaşımları. TRT Akademi Dergisi, 2(3), 6-47.
17. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage Publications.
18. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography. In R. Mansell & D. P. H. Ang (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society (pp. 1-26). John Wiley & Sons Publication.
19. Kütükoğlu, E. (2021). Afet gazeteciliğine gündem belirleme kuramı ve İzmir depremi haberlerinden bakış. MEDIAJ, 4(2), 211-233. doi.org/10.33464/mediaj.994871.
20. Lindsay, B. R. (2011). Social media and disasters: Current uses, future options, and policy considerations. Congressional Research Service. 1-13.
21. Liu, L., & Stevenson, M. D. (2013). A cross-cultural analysis of stance in disaster news reports. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 197-220.
22. Manela, A., & Moreira, A. (2017). News implied volatility and disaster concerns. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(1), 137-162. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco. 2016.01.032.
23. Mehta, A. M., Bruns, A., Newton, J. (2017). Trust but verify: Social media models for disaster management. Disasters 41(3), 549-565. doi.org.10.1111/disa.12218.
24. Miles, B., & Morse, S. (2007). The role of news media in natural disaster risk and recovery. Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 365-373. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2006.08.007.
25. Miller, A., & Goidel, R. (2009). News organizations and information gathering during a natural disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(4), 266-273. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 5973.2009.00586.x.
26. Nugent, T., Petroni, F., Raman, N., Carstens, L., & Leidner, J. L. (2017. A comparison of classification models for natural disaster and critical event detection from news. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 3750-3759.
27. Pantti, M. K. (2010). Disaster news and public emotions. In K. Döveling & E. A. Konijn (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media (pp. 221- 237). Routledge Publications. doi.org/10.4324/9780203885390.
28. Pantti, M. K. (2018). Crisis and disaster coverage. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0202.
29. Pantti, M. K. (2020). Afterword: The shifting domain of disaster journalism. In J. Matthews & E. Thorsen (Eds.), Media, Journalism and Disaster Communities (pp. 231- 240). Palgrave Macmillan. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33712-4_15.
30. Schifferes, S., & Coulter, S. (2013). Downloading disaster: BBC news online coverage of the global financial crisis. Journalism, 14(2), 228-252. doi.org/10.1177/1464884912460171.
31. Su, C. (2019). An alternative chronicle of natural disaster: Social justice journalism in Taiwan. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3321-3340.
32. Tong, J. (2017). Technology and journalism:‘Dissolving’social media content into disaster reporting on three Chinese disasters. International Communication Gazette, 79(4), 400-418. doi.org/10.1177/1748048516682142.
33. Valenzuela, S., Puente, S., & Flores, P. M. (2017). Comparing disaster news on Twitter and television: An intermedia agenda setting perspective. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(4), 615-637. doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017 .1344673.
34. Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Lachlan, K. A. (2009). Telepresence and the exemplification effects of disaster news. Communication Studies, 60(5), 542-557. doi. org/10.1080/10510970903260376.
35. Yan, L., Jin, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Effects of virtual reality technology in disaster news coverage based on MAIN model. HCI International 2022 Posters: 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 122-129.
36. Yan, Z., Zhao, H., Wang, F., Zhang, X., Cai, S., & Mei, X. (2020). Rapid assessment of building collapse based on sequential dynamic fusion of multi-source disaster information from news media. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 1-12. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101910.
37. Zhang, X. (2015). Comparative study on the appraisal resources of China Daily’s disaster news. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2118.