Between War and Compassion: Humanitarian Diplomacy Narratives in Middle Eastern Media During the Gaza War

Öz

Humanitarian diplomacy has become a central framework through which states and non-state actors respond to armed conflicts and humanitarian crises. While existing research has examined humanitarian diplomacy primarily from institutional or diplomatic perspectives, limited attention has been paid to how it is mediated and framed by state-funded international broadcasters in the Middle East. This study analyzes how humanitarian diplomacy was represented in four influential state-owned media outlets-TRT World, Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya, and Press TV-during the Gaza War. A total of 370 news items published between June 1 and June 30, 2025 were examined using quantitative content analysis. The findings reveal significant differences in thematic emphasis, particularly regarding civilian protection, humanitarian aid appeals, ceasefire advocacy, and human rights discourse. The results suggest that these media organizations function not merely as channels of information but as strategic actors that shape humanitarian diplomacy narratives in line with broader geopolitical orientations. By foregrounding media’s role in constructing humanitarian diplomacy, this study contributes to the literature on international communication and crisis reporting in the Middle Eastern context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Humanitarian Diplomacy
• International Communication
• Digital Media Analysis
• Content Analysis
• Media Framing

Destekleyen Kurum

This study was not supported by any institution/organization.

Etik Beyan

This study does not require ethical approval.

Savaş ve Merhamet Arasında Gazze Savaşında Ortadoğu Medyasının İnsani Diplomasi Anlatıları

Öz

İnsani diplomasi, devletlerin ve devlet dışı aktörlerin silahlı çatışmalara ve insani krizlere verdikleri tepkileri şekillendiren temel yaklaşımlardan biri hâline gelmiştir. Mevcut çalışmalar insani diplomasiyi ağırlıklı olarak kurumsal ve diplomatik boyutlarıyla ele alırken, bu olgunun Orta Doğu’daki devlet destekli uluslararası yayın kuruluşları tarafından nasıl temsil edildiği ve çerçevelendiği sınırlı ölçüde incelenmiştir. Bu çalışma, Gazze Savaşı sürecinde dört etkili devlet destekli medya kuruluşu olan TRT World, Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya ve Press TV’nin insani diplomasi söylemini nasıl temsil ettiğini analiz etmektedir. Bu kapsamda, 1 Haziran–30 Haziran 2025 tarihleri arasında yayımlanan toplam 370 haber, nicel içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Bulgular, özellikle sivillerin korunması, insani yardım çağrıları, ateşkes girişimleri ve insan hakları söylemi açısından medya kuruluşları arasında belirgin tematik farklılıklar bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, bu medya kuruluşlarının yalnızca bilgi aktaran platformlar olmadığını; aynı zamanda daha geniş jeopolitik yönelimler doğrultusunda insani diplomasi anlatılarını şekillendiren stratejik aktörler olarak işlev gördüklerini göstermektedir. Medyanın insani diplomasinin inşasındaki rolünü ortaya koyan bu çalışma, Orta Doğu bağlamında uluslararası iletişim ve kriz haberciliği literatürüne katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnsani Diplomasi
• Uluslararası İletişim
• Dijital Medya Analizi
• İçerik Analizi
• Medya Çerçevelemesi.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışmada herhangi bir kurum/kuruluştan destek alınmamıştır.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma etik kurul izni gerektirmemektedir.

Kaynakça

1. Al Arabiya (2025a). Support for Israel in Europe hits record low, YouGov survey finds. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/world/2025/06/04/support-for-israel-ineurope-hits-record-low-yougov-survey-finds
2. Al Arabiya (2025b). UN chief calls for ‘independent’ investigation after Gaza aid deaths. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2025/06/02/un-chief-callsfor-independent-investigation-after-gaza-aid-deathsAl Arabiya (2025c). Gaza child survivor of Israeli strike heads to Italy. https://english. alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2025/06/11/gaza-child-survivor-of-israelistrike-heads-to-italy
3. Al Jazeera (2025a). Israel kills more than 70 in Gaza, including 16 in attack on family home. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/7/israel-kills-over-70-ingaza-including-16-in-bombing-of-family-building
4. Al Jazeera (2025b). ‘Forgotten by the world’: Disability deepens sisters’ struggle in Gaza. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2025/6/3/disability-deepens-gazasisters-struggle-amid-israels-war
5. Al Jazeera (2025c). I’m in northern Gaza. I would rather starve than take GHF aid. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2025/6/25/im-in-northern-gaza-i-wouldrather-starve-than-take-ghf-aid
6. Alhirthani, M. (2025). Media coverage of human rights in Palestine, case study: Israel’s war on Gaza 2023–24. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 18(1), 83–100.
7. Altunisik, M. B. (2022). Humanitarian diplomacy as Turkey’s national role conception and performance: Evidence from Somalia and Afghanistan. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 23(3), 657–673.
8. Akpınar, P. (2013). Turkey’s peacebuilding in Somalia: The limits of humanitarian diplomacy. Turkish Studies, 14(4), 735–757.

9. Akyıldız, F. (2011). Binyıl kalkınma hedefleri, insan hakları ve demokrasi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14, 39–60.
10. Anholt, S. (2011). Yerlerin markalaşması: Kimlik, imaj ve itibar, Brand Age Yayınları.
11. Baird, T. (2015). The geopolitics of Turkey’s “Humanitarian diplomacy” in Somalia: A critique. Review Of African Political Economy, 43(149), 470–477.
12. Baritci, F. & Aydeniz, H. (2019). Kamu diplomasisi aracı olarak medya: TRT World örneği, Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 6(2), 1551–1576.
13. Barnett, M. (2011). Empire of humanity: A history of humanitarianism. Cornell University Press.
14. BBC. (2025). “What is Hamas and why is it fighting with Israel in Gaza?,” https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyv7w3gdy2o
15. Čakš, P., Kožuh, I., & Žilič Fišer, S. (2025). Journalistic roles and community expectations: External and internal challenges for local investigative journalism. Journalism Practice, 1–19.
16. Cohen, Y. (1986). Media diplomacy in Britain, Political Communication, 3(3), 245–264.
17. Constantinou, C. M. (2022). Humanitarian diplomacy as moral history. Peacebuilding, 11(1), 1–19.
18. De Lauri, A. 2018. Humanitarian diplomacy: A new research agenda. Cambridge Market Insights Brief 2018: 4. https://www.cmi.no/publications/6536-humanitariandiplomacy-a-new-research- agenda
19. Dieckhoff, M. (2020). Reconsidering the humanitarian space: Complex interdependence between humanitarian and peace negotiations in Syria. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(4), 564–586.
20. Dixon, P. (2017). ‘Endless wars of altruism?’ Human rights, humanitarianism and the Syrian war. The International Journal of Human Rights, online, 1–24.
21. Egeland, J. (2013). “Humanitarian diplomacy” In (Eds. A. F., Cooper, J., Heine & R. Thakur), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. (pp. 352–359), Oxford Handbooks Online.
22. El Damanhoury, K. & Saleh, F. (2025). Mediated clash of civilizations: Examining the proximity-visual framing nexus in Al Jazeera Arabic and Fox News’ coverage of the 2021 Gaza War. Digital Journalism, 13(1), 136–158.
23. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1).
24. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
25. Eren, E. (2019). Medya diplomasisi aktörü olarak TRT ve Balkanlardaki örnek faaliyetleri. TRT Akademi, 4(7), 26–41.
26. Ertekin, B. A. (2012). Uluslararası sistemde görsel-işitsel medyanın kamu diplomasisi ve kamuoyu yaratmadaki önemi: TRT’nin Türkçe dışında yayın yapan kanalları üzerine bir inceleme, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(42), 323–354.
27. Falk, R. (2008). Civil society perspectives on humanitarian intervention. Journal of Civil Society, 4(1), 3–14.
28. Gentzkow, M., Glaeser, L. E. & Goldin, C. (2006). The rise of the fourth estate (how newspapers became informative and why it mattered). Corruption and reform: Lessons from America’s economic history. 187–230.
29. Gilboa, E. (2001). Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects. Diplomacy and statecraft, 12(2), 1–28.
30. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. University of California Press, Berkeley.
31. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
32. Harroff-Tavel, M. (2006). “The humanitarian diplomacy of the international committee of the Red Cross.” International Committee of the Red Cross, http://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/humanitarian-diplomacy-icrc.pdf
33. Hay, C. (2013). From politics to politicization: Defending the indefensible? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(1), 109–112.
34. Howe, K., & Stites, E. (2019). Partners under pressure: Humanitarian action for the Syria crisis. Disasters, 43(1), 3–23.
35. Kabeya, A. Y. & Ngwenya, D. (2026). Building capacity for peace journalism: A participatory action research study in the Central African Republic. Journalism Practice, 1–21.
36. Karadeniz, Y. (2022). Türkiye’nin kamu diplomasisinde TRT World’ün rolü, USBAD Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi, 4(9), 560–578.
37. Kelman, I. (2011). Disaster diplomacy: how disasters affect peace and conflict. Routledge.
38. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
39. Locoman, E. & Lau, R. R. (2025). Narratives of conflict: Russian media’s evolving treatment of Ukraine (2013–2022). Media, War & Conflict, 18(3), 325–347.
40. Mahdavi, M. (2015). A postcolonial critique of responsibility to protect in the Middle East. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 20(1), 7–36.
41. Miladi, N., & Miladi, A. (2025). Livestreamed genocide: Framing analysis of Palestinians in the BBC and i24 News coverage of the war on Palestine (2023–24). Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies. April, 1–22.
42. Minear, L., & Hazel, S. (2007). Introduction. (Eds. L. Minear & H. Smith) Humanitarian diplomacy: Practitioners and their craft (pp. 1–5). United Nations University Press.
43. Murphy, B., Taylor, A., Westfall, S., Pietsch, B. & Hendrix, S. (2025). What’s behind the violence in Israel and Gaza? Here’s what to know. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/07/israel-gaza-violence-conflict-faq/
44. Nye, J. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, Autumn, No. 80, Twentieth Anniversary (Autumn, 1990), pp. 153–171.
45. Nye, J. (2005). Dünya siyasetinde başarının yolu: Yumuşak güç, Elips Kitap Yayınları.
46. O’Hagan, J., (2016). Australia and the promise and the perils of humanitarian diplomacy, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(6), 657–669.
47. Press TV. (2025a). US-backed aid plan aims to advance Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/06/08/749472/-Hamas--US-backed-aidplan-aims-to-advance-Israel%E2%80%99s-ethnic-cleansing-of-Palestinians
48. Press TV (2025b). UN says ‘not a single hospital functional’ in North Gaza amid Israel’s aid access denials. https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/06/05/749263/UNAll-North-Gaza-hospitals-non-functional-amid-Israeli-aid-access-denials
49. Press TV (2025c). ‘Torture and starvation’: Israeli forces detained 550 Palestinian women since Gaza genocide launched. https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/06/02/749114/israel-female-palestinian-abductees-prisoners
50. Regnier, P. (2011). The emerging concept of humanitarian diplomacy: Identification of a community of practice and prospects for international recognition. International Review of the Red Cross 93, No. 884, 1211–1237.
51. Ruiz Rosendo, L. & Ponomarenko, L. (2025). Interpreting and war journalism: Collecting memories of fixers in Ukraine. Journalism Practice, 1–20.
52. Saliu, H. (2022). “Rethinking media diplomacy and public diplomacy towards a new concept: Digital media diplomacy.” Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, 39, 4–24.
53. Slim, H. (2019). Humanitarian diplomacy: The ICRC’s Neutral and impartial advocacy in armed conflicts. Ethics and International Affairs, 33 (1):67–77.
54. Slim, H. (2024). What makes a good humanitarian diplomat? In (Ed. Hafize Zehra Kavak), Understanding humanitarian diplomacy: Principles and practice (pp. 148–168). Routledge.
55. Shoemaker, P. J. & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. Second Edition. Longman.
56. Şahin, M. & Çevik, B.S. (2015). Türk dış politikası ve kamu diplomasisi. Nobel Yayınları.
57. The Guardian (2023). Civilians and soldiers held hostage in Gaza, says Israel. https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/oct/07/hamas-launches-attack-onisrael-with-5000-rockets-live
58. TRT World (2025a). ‘We believe in truth,’ says activist aboard Gaza freedom Flotilla before Israeli siege. https://www.trtworld.com/article/09eb89f3ff09
59. TRT World (2025b). Gaza authorities debunk ‘fabricated’ Israeli video claiming to clear Israel of killing aid seekers. https://www.trtworld.com/article/3a421a6820ad
60. TRT World (2025c). After 600 days, western media still doesn’t know who is killing Palestinians in Gaza. https://www.trtworld.com/article/44576688c021
61. TRT World (2025d). BBC’s Gaza coverage reveals staggering bias against Palestinians. https://www.trtworld.com/article/d036afb581ec
62. Tokmak, M.C. (2024). Dijital diplomasi politikaları. Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
63. UNDP. (2000). Human development report 2000. https://hdr.undp.org/content/humandevelopment-report-2000
64. Warner, D. (2013). Henry Dunant’s imagined community: Humanitarianism and the tragic. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 38(1), 3–28.
65. Weiss, T. (1999). Principles, politics, and humanitarian action. Ethics & International Affairs, 13, 1–22.
66. White, M. D. & Marsh, E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55(1), 22–45.
67. Yıldırım, E. (2019). İnsani diplomasi faaliyetlerinin Türkiye’nin yumuşak gücüne etkisi. OPUS International Journal of Society Research, 13(19), 2562–2591.