Kültürün Reklamı: İngiliz ve Alman Geleneklerinde Kültür Diplomasisi

Öz

Kültürün farklı coğrafyalarda, farklı dillerle üretilen uzun bir tanıtım serüveni var. Her kültür ögesi, üretildiğinden daha farklı bir alana girdiğinde öncelikle bir tanışma sürecine tabi tutulur. Özel sektör ve kamu, kültürün yaygınlaştırılmasında önemli roller oynamış, iletişim teknolojileri geliştikçe bu durum ancak şekil değiştirmiştir. Kültürel diplomasi alanı, kısaca bir toplumun kültür ögelerinin bir başka topluluk ile tanıştırılması, bu yolla kültür üreticisi için kısa veya uzun vadeli çıkarlar elde edilmesi serüvenidir. Ancak tek bir tanımın içine sığamayacak kadar geniş bir alandır kültürel diplomasi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kültürel Çalışmalar
• Kültür Diplomasisi
• TRT Akademi

Kaynakça

1. Ang, I., Isar, Y. R., & Mar, P. (2015). Cultural diplomacy: Beyond the national inte- rest?, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(4), 365-381, DOI:10.1080/1028 6632.2015.1042474.
2. Demont-Heinrich, C. (2011). “Cultural imperialism vs globalization of culture: Ri- ding the structure-agency dialectic in global communication and media studies.” Sociology Compass, 5(8), 666-678.
3. Fejes, F. (1981). Media imperialism: an assessment. Media, Culture & Society, 3(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344378100300306
4. Haigh, A., & Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Co-operation. (1974). Cultural diplomacy in Europe. Council of Europe: New York, NY: Manhattan Pub. Stras- bourg. (Digitized by the University of Michigan, 2006).
5. Hastings, C. (25 Sept 2005) “Paid for the British Council, claim that the UK tested cluster bombs on Iraqi civilians” The Telegraph. Available at https://www.teleg- raph.co.uk/news/uknews/4197567/Paid-for-by-the-British-Council-claim-that
6. UK-tested-cluster-bombs-on-Iraqi-civilians.html
7. Hammond, R. A., & Axelrod, R. (2006). The Evolution of Ethnocentrism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(6), 926–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002706293470
8. House of Lords Soft Power and the UK’s Influence Committee Oral and Written Evidence. (2014). Vol 1 A-G

9. Pamment, J. (2016). British public diplomacy and soft power: Diplomatic influen- ce and digital disruption. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Pajtinka, E. (2014). Cultural Diplomacy in Theory and Practice of Contemporary International
11. Relations . Politicke vedy. 4, pp. 95-108.
12. Rivera, T. (2015). Distinguishing Cultural Relations from Cultural diplomacy: The British Council’s Relationship with Her Majesty’s Government. USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School. (p. 12)
13. Rose, Martin. (2017). A New Cultural Diplomacy: The Integration of Cultural Re- lations and Diplomacy . Ifa Input / 3.
14. Saunders, F. S. (2000). Who paid the piper? The CIA and the cultural cold war. London: Granata Books.
15. “New Power, New Responsibility” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik and The Ger- man Marshall Fund of the United States, Berlin, 2013.
16. Straubhaar, J. D. (2000). Culture, Language and Social Class in the Globalization of Television. In Georgette Wang, J. Servaes, & A. Goonasekera (Eds.), The New Communications Landscape: Demystifying Media Globalization (pp. 199–224). London & New York: Routledge.
17. Thussu, D. K. (2010). Mapping Global Media Flow and Contra-Flow. In D. K. Thus- su (Ed.), International Communication: A Reader (pp. 221–238). Oxon & New York: Routledge.
18. Toth, E.L. 2009. The Case for Pluralistic Studies of Public Relations: Rhetorical, Cri- tical and Excellence Perspectives. In Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II eds. R.L. Heath, E.L. Toth, and D. Waymer, 76–91. New York: Routle- dge; Everett, J.A.
19. Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural imperialism: A critical introduction. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Topic, M., & Rodin, S. (Eds.). (2012). Cultural diplomacy and cultural imperialism. (ss. 243- 245). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
21. Von Eschen, P. (2006). Satchmo blows up the world: Jazz ambassadors play the cold war. Cambridge, Massachutes: Harvard University Press.