ÇALIŞAN ANNELER ARAŞTIRMALARI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3, 491 - 508, 11.12.2023

Aylin Akyol

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı 1992-2019 yıllarında uluslar arası alanyazında çalışan anneler konusundaki araştırmaları inceleyerek mevcut durum değerlendirmesi yapmaktır. Çalışmada derleme makale türü benimsenmekte ve alanyazın taraması yöntemi kullanılmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında elektronik veri tabanlarından (ScienceDirect, Ebsco, Emerald, JSTOR) ‘annelik’’, ‘’çalışan anneler’’ anahtar kelimeleriyle yapılan alanyazın taramasında ulaşılan 51 makale değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Araştırmalar yazarları, yayın yılı, yayınlandığı dergi, kullanılan araştırma yöntemi ve inceleme konuları açısından incelenerek kronolojik şekilde (1992-2019) tablo ile açıklanmaktadır. Çalışma sonucunda incelenen makaleler kapsamında en sık 2011, 2012 ve 2014 yıllarında makale yayınlandığı görülmektedir. Makalelerin yayınlandığı dergiler, Journal of Marriage and Family, Gender & Society, Women’s Studies International Forum, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy şeklinde olmaktadır. Makalelerde en sık kullanılan araştırma yöntemi nicel ve nitel yöntemdir. İncelenen makaleler araştırma konuları bakımından ise çeşitlenmektedir. Çalışma ileriki uygulamalı ve teorik çalışmalara temel oluşturma potansiyeli taşımaktadır. Çalışan anneler konusunda Türkiye’de daha fazla sayıda araştırma yapılma ihtiyacı olduğu ortaya çıkmaktadır. İleriki araştırmaların çalışan annelerle ilgili farklı konulara odaklanması, ve farklı araştırma yöntemleri kullanarak alanyazını zenginleştirmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Annelik, Çalışan anneler, Alanyazın taraması

Kaynakça

• Abendroth, A.K., Lippe, T.V.D. & Maas, I. (2012). Social support and the working hours of employed mothers in Europe: The relevance of the state, the workplace and the family. Social Science Research, 41, 581-597.
• Albrecht, G.H. (2003). How friendly are family friendly policies? Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 177-192.
• Amer, M. (2013). Combining academic career and motherhood: Experiences and challenges of women in academia. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 12-15.
• Anderson, D.J., Binder, M. & Krause, K. (2003). The Motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort and work-schedule flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(2), 273-294.
• Andringa, W., Nieuwenhuis, R., & Gerven, M.V. (2015). Women’s working hours: The interplay between gender role attitudes, motherhood and public childcare support in 23 European countries. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(9), 582-599.
• Aranda, B. & Glick, P. (2014). Signaling devotion to work over family undermines the motherhood penalty. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 91-99.
• Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1192-1207.
• Ayyıldız-Ünnü, N.A. (2015). Yönetim erkeklerin yönetimi mi? Yönetim bilimlerine eleştirel bir yaklaşım. In O. Sürgevil-Dalkılıç (Ed.), ÇalışAnne: Kadın akademisyenlerin kaleminden çalışma yaşamında annelik, (pp..215-246). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Bacacı-Varoğlu, D. (2007). Örgütsel yaşamda toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri. In S. Güney (Ed.), Yönetim ve Organizasyon. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Bailey, L. (1999). Refracted selves? A study of changes in self-identity in the transition to motherhood. Sociology, 33(2), 335-352.
• Baird, C.L. & Burge, S.W. (2018). Family-friendly benefits and full time working mothers’ labor force persistence. Community, Work & Family, 21(2), 168-192.
• Baker, M. (2010). Motherhood, employment and the child penalty. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 215-224.
• Balogun, A.G. (2019). Work-family conflict and burnout among working mothers: The role of work-family conflict self-efficacy. Gender & Behavior, 17(4), 14224-14236.
• Beets, G.C.N., Liefbroer, A.C. & De Jong Gierveld, J. (1997). Combining employment and parenthood: A longitudinal study of intentions of Dutch young adults. Population Research and Policy Review, 16(5), 457-474.
• Benard, S. & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society, 24(5), 616-646. Besamusca, J., Tijdens, K., Keune M., & Steinmetz, S. (2015). Working women worlwide. Age effects in female labor force participation in 117 countries. World Development, 74, 123-141.
• Bianchi, S.M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37(4), 401-414.
• Bjursell, C. & Backvall, L. (2011). Family business women in media discourse: The business role and the mother role. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(2), 154-173.
• Blossfeld, H.P. & Jaenichen, U. (1992). Educational expansion and changes in women’s entry into marriage and motherhood in the Federal Republic of Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(2), 302-315.
• Blum, L.M. & Deussen, T. (1996). Negotiating independent motherhood: Working-class African American women talk about marriage and motherhood. Gender & Society, 10(2), 199-211.
• Bronars, S.G. & Grogger, J. (1994). The economic consequences of unwed motherhood: Using twin births as a natural experiment. The American Economic Review, 84(5), 141-1156.
• Brown, L.M. (2010). The relationship between motherhood and professional advancement: Perceptions versus reality. Employee Relations, 32(5), 470-494.
• Burrell, G. & Hearn, J. (1989). The sexuality of organization. In J.Hearn, D. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff ve G. Burrell (Eds.), Sexuality of organization, (pp.1-29). London: SAGE.
• Chang, Y.E. (2013). The relation between mother’s attitudes toward maternal employment and social competence of 36-month-olds: The roles of maternal psychological well-being and sensitivity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 987-999.
• Chodorow, N. (1978). The Reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Chodorow, N.J. (2000). Reflections on the reproduction of mothering-twenty years later. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 1(4), 337-348.
• Choi, P., Henshaw, C., Baker, S. & Tree, J. (2005). Supermum, superwife, supereverything: Performing femininity in the transition to motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23(2), 167-180.
• Cooke, L.Y., & Gash, V. (2010). Wives’ part-time employment and marital stability in Great Britain, West Germany and The United States. Sociology, 44(6), 1091-1108.
• Costa, B.M., Walker A., Zinkiewicz L., Berman, H., Cartledge, A. & Nheng, S. (2012). The maternity journey in an organisational context: A case study. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Organisational Psychology, 5, 43-49.
• Coşkun, B. & Çelikten, M. (2020). Öğretmenlik meslek etiği üzerine bir inceleme. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi-OPUS, 15(21), 686-710.
• Crowley, J.E. (2013). Perceiving and responding to maternal workplace discrimination in The United States. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 192-202.
• Dillaway, H. & Pare, E. (2008). Locating mothers: How cultural debates about stay-at-home versus working mothers define women and home. Journal of Family Issues, 29(4), 437-464.
• Donath, O. (2015). Regretting motherhood: A sociopolitical analysis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 40(2), 343-367.
• Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T. & Alldred, P. (2003). Motherhood, paid work and partnering: Values and theories. Work, Employment and Society, 17(2), 309-330.
• Eagly, A.H. & Steffen, V.J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
• Effinger, B.P. (2012). Women’s employment in the institutional and cultural context International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(9/10), 530-543.
• Eisner, S.P. (2007). The mommy trek? Working women’s choices. Journal of Diversity Management, 2(1), 1-15.
• Erdoğan, T. (2008). Nancy chodorow’un düşüncesinde toplumsal cinsiyet organizasyonunun merkezi unsuru olarak annelik. Aile ve Toplum, 4(14), 73-82.
• Fagan, C. & Norman, H. (2012). Trends and social divisions in maternal employment patterns following maternity leave in the UK. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(9/10), 544-560.
• Frost, N. & Holt, A. (2014). Mother, researcher, feminist, woman: Reflections on maternal status as a researcher identity. Qualitative Research Journal, 14(2), 90-102.
• Gatrell, C.J. (2014). Monstrous motherhood versus magical maternity: An exploration of conflicting attitudes to maternity within health discourses and organizational settings. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 33(7), 633-647.
• Giddens, A. (2012). Sosyoloji. (C. Güzel, Çev). Ankara: Kırmızı Yayınları.
• Glauber, R. (2011). Women’s work and working conditions: Are mothers compensated for lost wages? Work and Occupations, 20(10), 1-24.
• Greenhaus, J.H.& Beutell, N.J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management, 10(1), 76-88.
• Güngör, G. & Biernat, M. (2009). Gender bias or motherhood disadvantage? Judgments of blue collar mothers and fathers in the workplace. Sex Roles, 60, 232-246. Hagelskamp, C., Hughes, D., Yoshikawa, H.& Chaudry, A. (2011). Negotiating motherhood and work: A typology of role identity associations among low-income, urban women. Community, Work & Family, 14(3), 335-366.
• Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood, New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Hays, S. (2011). The mommy wars: Ambivalence, ideological work and the cultural contradictions of motherhood. In A. Skolnick ve J. Skolnick (Eds.), (pp.41-60). Family in transition. Boston: Pearson.
• Holness, L. (2004). Motherhood and spirituality: Faith reflections from the inside. Agenda, 18(61), 66-71.
• Jacques, H. AK, & Radtke, H.L. (2012). Constrained by Choice: Young women negotiate the discourses of marriage and motherhood. Feminism & Psychology, 22(4), 443-461.
• Jeremiah, E. (2006). Motherhood to mothering and beyond: Maternity in recent feminist thought. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 8(1/2), 21-33.
• Kanji, S. (2011). What keeps mothers in full-time employment? European Sociological Review, 27(4 ), 509-525.
• Kassamali, N. & Rattani, S.A. (2014). Factors that affect attachment between the employed mother and the child, infancy to two years. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 6-15.
• Köroğlu, S.A. (2015). Literatür taraması üzerine notlar ve bir tarama tekniği. GİDB/Dergi, 1, 61-69.
• Laney, E.K., Carruthers, L., Hall, M.E.L. & Anderson, T. (2014). Expanding the self: Motherhood and identity development in faculty women. Journal of Family Issues, 20(10), 1-25.
• Looze, J. (2014). Young women’s job mobility: The influence of motherhood status and education. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 693-709.
• Matthey, S. (2011). Assessing the experience of motherhood: The being a mother scale (BaM-13). Journal of Affective Disorders, 128, 142-152.
• McIntosh, B., McQuaid, R., Munro, A. & Dabir-Alai, P. (2012). Motherhood and its impact on career progression. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 27(5), 346-364.
• Meglich, P., Mihelic, K.K. & Zupan, N. (2016). The outcomes of perceived work-based support for mothers: A conceptual model. Management, 21, 21-50.
• Parrott, H.M. (2014). Housework, children and women’s wages across racial-ethnic groups. Social Science Research, 46, 72-84.
• Pas, B., Peters, P., Eisinga, R., Doorewaard, H. & Janssen, T.L. (2011). Explaining career motivation among female doctors in The Netherlands: The effects of children, views on motherhood and work-home cultures. Work, Employment and Society, 25(3), 487-505.
• Peterson, R.R. & Gerson, K. (1992). Determinants of responsibility for child care arrangements among dual-earner couples. Journal of Marrriage and the Family, 54, 527-536.
• Phoenix, A. & Woollett, A. (1991). Introduction. In A. Le, A. Woolett ve E. Lloyd (Eds.) Motherhood: meaning, practices and ideologies. London: Sage Publications.
• Read, D.M.Y., Crockett, J. & Mason, R. (2012). “It was A horrible shock”: The experience of motherhood and women’s family size preferences. Women’s Studies International Forum, 35, 12-21.
• Ridgeway, C.L. & Correll, S.J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 683-700.
• Rönka, A., Malinen, K., Sevon, E., Metsapelto, R.L. & May, V. (2017). Positive parenting and parenting stress among working mothers in Finland, The UK and The Netherlands: Do working time patterns matter? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 48(2), 175-196.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. UK: Pearson.
• Seçer, Ş. (2010). Çalışan anneler ve çalışan annelere yönelik ayrımcılık. İzmir: Altın nokta Yayınevi.
• Süregevil-Dalkılıç, O. (2015). Annelerin öykülerinden açığa çıkanlar: Annelik ve çalışan anneliğe yüklenen anlamlar, çalışma hayatından örnek olaylar, ihtiyaçlar ve beklentiler. In O. Sürgevil-Dalkılıç (Ed.), ÇalışAnne: Kadın akademisyenlerin kaleminden çalışma yaşamında annelik (pp.407-466). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Uttal, L. (1996). Custodial care, surrogate care and coordinated care: Employed mothers and the meaning of child care. Gender and Society, 10(3), 291-311.