Populist Radikal Sağ Partilerin Seçim Başarılarında Avrupalılaşma Sürecinin Etkisinin Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi: 2000-2010 Orta ve Doğu Avrupa Seçimleri

Öz

Orta ve Doğru Avrupa ülkelerindeki popülist radikal sağ partiler, ülkelerinin Avrupa Birliği'ne üyeliğine karşı şüpheci bir tutum içinde olmuşlardır. Avrupa Birliği'nin dördüncü genişleme sürecinin parçası olan Orta ve Doğu Avrupa ülkelerinde 1990lı yıllarda radikal sağ partiler dikkat çekecek seçim başarısı elde edememişlerdir. Milenyumun ilk 10 yılında ise bu durum değişmiş ve popülist radikal sağ partiler çoğu ülkede önemli seçim başarısı kazanmışlardır. Bu çalışma, söz konusu dönem özelinde, küme-teorik yaklaşım üzerine geliştirilmiş muğlak-küme analizi yöntemini kullanarak, popülist radikal sağ partilerin hangi koşullar altında seçim başarısı elde ettiklerini tartışmaktadır. Çalışmanın bulguları üç cümlede özetlenebilir. Birincisi, ana akım sağ partilerin Avrupa Birliği üyeliğine destek vermeleri, popülist radikal sağ partilere yaramıştır. İkincisi, özellikle Romanların yoğun olarak yaşadıkları ülkelerde yolsuzluk probleminin varlığı ve ana akım partilerin siyasi yelpazenin merkezine yakın konumlanması populist radikal sağ partilerin seçim performanslarını olumlu etkilemiştir. Üçüncüsü, ikinci sonucun aksine, Romanların sayıca az olduğu ülkelerde, ana akım sağ partinin siyasi yelpazenin ucuna yakın konumlanması populist radikal sağ partilerin seçim başarısı elde etmelerine olanak sağlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Radikal Sağ
• Avrupalılaşma
• Populizm
• Etnik milliyetçilik
• Seçim rekabeti

Revisiting the Conditions of the Populist Radical Right Electoral Success in CEE during Europeanization period: A Fuzzy-set Approach

Öz

The Populist Radical Right parties (PRR) in Central and East European countries (CEECs) are skeptical about supporting the European Union membership. In the 1990s seldom did the PRR electoral success occur in CEECs that engaged into the fourth enlargement of the European Union during the first decade of the new millennium. Then, the PRR received more votes. Applying a new methodological approach based on fuzzy-set analysis, this study revisits under which context the PRR achieved electoral success in the period from 2000 to 2010. This study concludes: first, right wing mainstream parties’ positive stance on the issue of EU-membership benefitted the PRR in parliamentary elections held during the period 2000 to 2010. Second, the presence of a notable Roma population was context-setting condition: the policy divergence between right-wing mainstream party and the PRR, along with the unemployment problem (unlike the corruption problem) helped the latter, if a notable Roma population exists (e.g. Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia). In countries without a significant number of Roma populations (e.g. Poland and Slovenia), the PRR electoral success occurred when the right wing mainstream parties pursued socially illiberal policies despite its support for the EU membership.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Radical Right
• Europeanization
• Populism
• Ethnic-nationalism
• Electoral Competition

Kaynakça

1. Anastasakis, O. (2002). Political Extremism in Eastern Europe; A Reaction to Transition Papeles del Este Transiciones Poscomunistas, No. 3: 1-15.
2. Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., Vachudova, M.A. (2015). Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999-2010, Party Politics 21(1): 143-152.
3. Batory, A. (2010). Europe and Hungarian Parliamentary Elections of April 2010, European Parties Elections and Referendums Networks: Election Briefing No. 51, available at http://archive.ceu.hu/sites/default/files/publications/no51epernhungary2010_0.pdf (27 December 2021).
4. Beichelt, T. (2004). Euro-Skepticism in the EU Accession Countries, Comparative European Politics, 2: 29-50.
5. Bustikova, L. (2009). The Extreme Right in Eastern Europe: EU Accession and the Quality of Democratic Governance, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 17 (2): 223-239.
6. Bustikova L. and Kitschelt, H. (2009). The Radical Right in post-communist Europe: Comparative Perspectives on legacies and party competition, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 42(4): 459-483.
7. Cahn C. and Guild, E. Recent Migration of Rome in Europe. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, available at https://www.osce.org/hcnm/78034?download=true (17 December 2021).
8. de Vries Catherine E. and Tillman, E. (2011). European Union issue voting in East and West Europe: The role of political context, Comparative European Politics 9(1): 1-17.

9. Eatwell, R. (2003). Ten Theories of Extreme Right. in Peter Merkl and Leonard Weinberg (eds). Right Wing Extremism in the 21st Century, London, Frank Cass, 2003: 45-70.
10. Enyedi Z. and Bertoa, F. C. (2011). Patterns of Party Competition 1990-2009 in Lewis, Paul and Radoslaw Markowski (eds). Europeanizing Party Politics? Comparative Perspectives on Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press: 116-142.
11. European Commission (2002). Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2001, 56 available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/cceb/2001/cceb20011_en.pdf (3 December 2021).
12. Fidrmuc J. (2000). Economic voting in post-communist countries, Electoral Studies 19 (2): 199-217.
13. Greskovits, B. (2007). Economic Woes and Political Disaffection, Journal of Democracy 184 (4): 40-46.
14. Gryzmalala-Busse, A. and Innes, A. (2003). Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe, East European Politics and Societies 17: 64-78.
15. Hanley S. and Sikk, A. (2016). Economy, corruption, or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of Anti-Establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe, Party Politics 22 (4): 522-533.
16. Hooghe L., Bakker, R. Brigevich, A. de Vries, C. Edwards, E. Marks, G. Rovny, J. Steenbergen, M. (2010). Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006, European Journal of Political Research 49: 684-703.
17. Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter revolution: Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right-wing Parties in Europe, European Journal of Political Research 22: 3-34.
18. Inglehart Ronald and Flanagan, S. C (1987). Value Change in Industrial Societies American Political Science Review, 81 (4): 1289-1319.
19. Ishiyama, J. (2009). Historical Legacies and the Size of Red-Brown Vote in Post-communist Politics, Communist and Post-communist Studies 42: 485-504.
20. Ishiyama, J. and Batta, A. (2011). The Emergence of Dominant Party Systems in Unrecognized States Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45: 123-130.
21. Kostadinova T. and Kmetty, Z. (2019). Corruption and Political Participation in Hungary: Testing Models of Civic Engagements East European Politics, Societies and Culture, 33(3): 555-578.
22. Kitschelt, H. and McGann, A. J. (1995). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23. Kopecky P. and Mudde. C. (2002). The Two Sides of Euroscepticism: Party Positions on European Integration in East Central Europe, European Union Politics 3(3): 297-326.
24. Lilliefeldt, E. (2012). Party and Gender in Western Europe revisited: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of gender-balanced parliamentary parties Party Politics 18(2): 193 – 214.
25. Lillien, D. M (1982). Sectoral Shifts and Cyclical Unemployment, Journal of Political Economy, 90(4): 777-793.
26. Marks G., Hooghe, L. Nelson, M. and Edwards, E. (2006). Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West, Comparative Political Studies, 39(2): 155-175.
27. Meguid Bonnie M (2005). Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success, American Political Science Review 99 (3): 347-359.
28. Minkenberg, M. (2002). The Radical Right in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe: Comparative Observations and Interpretations, East European Politics and Societies, 16(2): 335-362.
29. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Mudde, C. (2010). The Populist Radical Right: A pathological normalcy? West European Politics 33 (6): 1167-1186.
31. Nanou, K. and Dorussen, H. (2013): European Integration and electoral democracy: How the European Union constraints party competition in the Member States, European Journal of Political Research, 52: 71-93.
32. Netjes, C. E. and Binnema, H. A. (2009). The Salience of the European Integration Issue: Three data source compared, Electoral Studies, 26 (2007): 39-49.
33. Norris P. (2005). Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Pankowski, R. (2010). The Populist Radical Right in Poland, New York: Routledge.
35. Ragin C. (2008): Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Rohrschneider R. and Whitefield, S. (2009). Understanding Cleavages in Party Systems: Issue Position and Issue Salience in 13 Post-Communist Democracies, Party Politics 42(2): 280-313.
37. Rose, R. and Munro, N. (2009). Parties and Elections in new European Democracies Essex: ECPR Press.
38. Rydgren J. (2007). The Sociology of Radical Right Annual Review of Sociology 33, 241-262.
39. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2007). EU Accession is No End of the History, Journal of Democracy, 18 (4): 8 - 16.
40. Sartori G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems: a framework for analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Schneider C. and Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Szczerbiak A. (2001). Polish Public Opinion: Explaining Declining Support for EU membership, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(1): 105-122).
43. Szczerbiak A. and Taggart, P. (2004): Conclusion: Toward a model of European Referendums, West European Politics 27(4): 749-777. Transparency International Website available at https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/cpi_2001 (16 December 2021).
44. Vachudova M. A. (2008). Center-Right Political Parties and Political Outcomes in East Central Europe, Party Politics, 14(4): 387-405.
45. Vachudova M. A. and Hooghe, L. (2009): Post-communist politics in a magnetic field: How Transition and EU Accession structure party competition on European integration, Comparative European Politics 7(2): 179-212.
46. van der Brug, W. and Fennema, M. (2009). The Support Base of Radical Right Parties in the Enlarged European Union, Journal of European Integration 31(5): 589-608.
47. Veugelers J. and Magnan, A. (2005). Conditions of far-right strength in contemporary Western Europe: an application of Kitschelt’s theory, European Journal of Political Research 44: 837-860;
48. von Beyme K. (2015). Transforming Transformation Theory in Michael Minkenberg (ed.) Transforming the Transformation: The East European Radical Right in the Political Process, Oxon: Routledge: 13 - 26.
49. Werts H., Scheepers, P. and Lubbers, M. (2013): Euro-scepticism and radical right wing voting in Europe: 2002-2008: Social Cleavages, Socio-political Attitudes, and Contextual Characteristics Determining Voting for Radical Right, European Union Politics, 14(2): 183-205.
50. Ziller C. and Schübel, T. (2015): The Pure People” versus “the Corrupt Elite”? Political Corruption, Political Trust and the Success of Radical Right Parties in Europe, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Political Parties, 25(3): 368-386.