Kişilik Özelliklerinin Sosyal Hizmet Mesleğine Uygunluk Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, sosyal hizmet öğrencilerinin kişilik özellikleri ile mesleki uygunlukları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Kişilik değerlendirmesi, Beş Faktör Kişilik Modeli (duygusal denge, dışadönüklük, deneyime açıklık, sorumluluk, uyumluluk) ve Karanlık Üçlü (narsisizm, makyavelizm, psikopati) temelinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Mesleki uygunluk ise etik değerler, toplumsal duyarlılık, uygulama yeterliliği ve kişisel uygunluk boyutlarıyla ölçülmüştür. Nicel araştırma yöntemine dayanan çalışmada, 277 sosyal hizmet öğrencisinden elde edilen veriler regresyon analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgulara göre, deneyime açıklık, duygusal denge ve uyumluluk mesleki uygunluk üzerinde pozitif etki yaratırken; psikopati olumsuz yönde etkide bulunmuştur. Literatürün aksine, narsisizmin sosyal hizmet mesleğine uygunluğu pozitif olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Bu durum narsisizmin bazı durumlarda sosyal kabul ve özsaygı gibi işlevsel çıktılar aracılığıyla mesleki uygunluğu destekleyebileceği şeklinde yorumlanabilir. Öte yandan, dışadönüklük ve makyavelizm ile mesleki uygunluk arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır. Sonuçlar, sosyal hizmet eğitiminde kişilik özelliklerinin dikkate alınması gerektiğini vurgulamakta ve ileride yapılacak araştırmalarda farklı örneklemler ve aracı değişkenlerin kullanılması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kişilik
• Sosyal Hizmet
• Mesleki Uygunluk
• Beş faktörlü Kişilik Modeli
• Karanlık Üçlü.

A Study on the Effect of Personality Traits on the Appropriateness for the Social Work Profession

Öz

This study examines the relationship between personality traits and professional suitability among social work students. Personality assessment was conducted based on the Five-Factor Personality Model (emotional stability, extraversion, openness to experience, conscientiousness, and agreeableness) and the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Professional suitability was measured across four dimensions: ethical values, social sensitivity, practical competence, and personal appropriateness. Utilizing a quantitative research method, data collected from 277 social work students were analyzed through regression analysis. Findings indicate that openness to experience, emotional stability, and agreeableness have a positive effect on professional suitability, while psychopathy has a negative impact. Contrary to the existing literature, narcissism was found to have a positive influence on professional suitability in the field of social work. This may suggest that certain narcissistic tendencies could functionally contribute to professional alignment by enhancing social acceptance and self-esteem. On the other hand, no significant relationship was found between extraversion or Machiavellianism and professional suitability. The results underscore the importance of considering personality traits, alongside academic performance, in social work education, and suggest that future research should involve more diverse samples and mediating variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Personality
• Social Work
• Professional Suitability
• Five-Factor Personality Model
• Dark Triad

Kaynakça

1. Akarçay-Ulutaş, D. (2020). Sosyal hizmette kültürel yetkinlik eğitimi: içeriğe yönelik bir sistematik derleme çalışması. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31(3), 1248-1277. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.628446
2. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3. Bağcı, E. (2015). Sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının iş yerindeki informal öğrenmelere ilişkin görüşleri. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 26(1), 89-110. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tsh/issue/48535/616094
4. Bailey, I. R, & Barton, H. (2014). Narcissism and the social work response. Australian Social Work, 67(4), 582-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2014.910817
5. Cole, B. S., & Lewis, R. G. (1993). Gatekeeping through termination of unsuitable social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1993.10778810
6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
7. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, And Evaluation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
8. Currer, C. (2009). Assessing student social workers’ professional suitability: comparing university procedures in England. The British Journal of Social Work, 39(8), 1481-1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn056

9. Currer, C., & Atherton, K. (2008). Suitable to remain a student social worker? Decision making in relation to termination of training. Social Work Education, 27(3), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470701381343
10. Çal, Ş., & Ay, U. (2023). Karanlık üçlü ve kompulsif satın alma arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi: materyalizmin aracılık rolü. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(2), 417-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.15659/ttad.15.2.174
11. de las Olas Palma-García, M., & Hombrados-Mendieta, I. (2017). Resilience and personality in social work students and social workers. International Social Work, 60(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814537856
12. Deal, K. H., & Pittman, J. (2009). Examining predictors of social work students’ critical thinking skills. Advances in Social Work, 10(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.18060/197
13. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). Sage.
14. Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. (2011). Importance of empathy for social work practice: integrating new science. Social Work, 56(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/56.2.141
15. Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. A. (2009). A social work model of empathy. Advances in Social Work, 10(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.18060/235
16. Gerrig, R. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2020). Psikoloji ve yaşam: Psikolojiye giriş (G. Sart, Çev.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
17. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
19. Holmström, C. (2014). Suitability for professional practice: assessing and developing moral character in social work education. Social Work Education, 33(4), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2013.847914
20. International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Sosyal hizmet nedir? Erişim tarihi: 13 Haziran 2025, https://www.ifsw.org/sosyal-hizmet-nedir/
21. Jonason, P. K., & Krause, L. (2013a). The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 532-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.027
22. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological assessment, 22(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
23. Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
24. Kalaycı Kırlıoğlu, H. İ., Daşbaş, S., & Karakuş, Ö. (2020). Sosyal hizmet uygulamasında mesleki uygunluk ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31(3), 793-822. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.664442
25. Khan, A. N., Khan, N. A., Bodla, A. A., & Gul, S. (2020). Impact of psychopathy on employee creativity via work engagement and negative socioemotional behavior in public health sector. Personnel Review, 49(8), 1655-1675. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2019-0072
26. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the dark triad and honesty-humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1860
27. Manktelow, R., & Lewis, C. A. (2005). A study of the personality attributes of applicants for postgraduate social work training to a northern Ireland university. Social Work Education, 24(3), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500050503
28. Miller, J., & Koerin, B. (1998). Can We Assess Suitability at Admission? A Review of MSW Application Procedures. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(3), 437-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1998.10778938
29. Moore, L. S., & Urwin, C. A. (1991). Gatekeeping: A Model for Screening Baccalaureate Students for Field Education. Journal of Social Work Education, 27(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1991.10672164
30. Morsünbül, U. (2014). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of quick big five personality test. Düşünen Adam Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 27(4), 316-322. 10.5350/DAJPN2014270405
31. Nesje, K. (2016). Personality and professional commitment of students in nursing, social work, and teaching: A comparative survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 53, 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.001
32. O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
33. Pancaroğlu, M. S., & Yelboğa, N. (2023). Çok kriterli karar verme yaklaşımı ile sosyal hizmet mesleki uygunluk kriterlerinin sıralanması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(3), 642-655. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1298181
34. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36 (6), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
35. Raineri, A., & Cartes, M. (2024). Psychological safety and work design as mediators of supervisors’ dark triad traits impact on nurses’ task performance. International Journal of Public Health, 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607340
36. Selcik, O., & Güzel, B. (2016). Sosyal hizmet mesleğinin çalışma alanı ve sosyal hizmet uygulamasının Türkiye ölçeğinde değerlendilrilmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(46), 461-469.
37. Sowbel, L. R., & Miller, S. E. (2015). Gatekeeping in graduate social work education: should personality traits be considered? Social Work Education, 34(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.953046
38. Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & Lebreton, J. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(S1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894
39. Tam, D. M., Twigg, R. C., Boey, K. W., & Kwok, S. M. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis on the professional suitability scale for social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(4), 467-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513480840
40. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
41. Tellegen, A. (1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0402_12
42. Vigilante, F. W. (1983). Students’ narcissism and academic performance. Social Casework, 64(10), 602-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438948306401004
43. Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
44. Wodarski, J. S., Pippin, J. A., & Daniels, M. (1988). The effects of graduate social work education on personality, values and interpersonal skills. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(3), 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1988.10671260
45. Zheng, W., Wu, Y.-C. J., Chen, X., & Lin, S.-J. (2017). Why do employees have counterproductive work behavior? The role of founder’s Machiavellianism and the corporate culture in China. Management Decision, 55(3), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2016-0696
46. Zuchowski, I., Watson, S., Dickinson, T., Thomas, N., & Croaker, S. (2019). Social work students’ feedback about students’ suitability for field education and the profession. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(2), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss2id633